A Retrospective Comparison of Creatinine Changes Among Patients Receiving, Not Receiving, and Not Yet Receiving Contrast Administration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: We sought to compare variability in serum creatinine among inpatients in our institution receiving contrast imaging studies and among inpatients not receiving such studies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-site, multiple-cohort study in a 550-bed academic medical center in October 2016 used the electronic medical record data to analyze the greatest absolute and relative changes in serum creatinine over periods no longer than 48 hours (1) during the admission for 1,134 patients who did not receive a contrast imaging study, (2) before the earliest contrast study for 155 patients who had not yet had a scheduled contrast examination, and (3) straddling the time when 266 patients received their earliest contrast study. We compared creatinine changes in the first cohort with those in the second and the third using histograms and t tests. Results: Among those who did not receive contrast, 18.3% had a creatinine increase of greater than 0.3 mg/dL, and before contrast, 14.2% had such increases (P =.22). After contrast, 6.4% had increases at least this great (P <.001). Patients with increases in creatinine before contrast tended to have such increases after as well (Pearson's 0.48, P <.001). Conclusions: Physiological variability may explain the similar increases among patients who did not receive contrast versus patients who had not yet received contrast. Hydration therapy may explain the milder and fewer increases after contrast. Only a randomized clinical trial can determine whether acute kidney injuries are caused by contrast; these results support equipoise for such a trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1285-1292
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume15
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Creatinine
Inpatients
Electronic Health Records
Serum
Acute Kidney Injury
Cohort Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{5d764a846ed045048a69dc14cc2cdb57,
title = "A Retrospective Comparison of Creatinine Changes Among Patients Receiving, Not Receiving, and Not Yet Receiving Contrast Administration",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to compare variability in serum creatinine among inpatients in our institution receiving contrast imaging studies and among inpatients not receiving such studies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-site, multiple-cohort study in a 550-bed academic medical center in October 2016 used the electronic medical record data to analyze the greatest absolute and relative changes in serum creatinine over periods no longer than 48 hours (1) during the admission for 1,134 patients who did not receive a contrast imaging study, (2) before the earliest contrast study for 155 patients who had not yet had a scheduled contrast examination, and (3) straddling the time when 266 patients received their earliest contrast study. We compared creatinine changes in the first cohort with those in the second and the third using histograms and t tests. Results: Among those who did not receive contrast, 18.3{\%} had a creatinine increase of greater than 0.3 mg/dL, and before contrast, 14.2{\%} had such increases (P =.22). After contrast, 6.4{\%} had increases at least this great (P <.001). Patients with increases in creatinine before contrast tended to have such increases after as well (Pearson's 0.48, P <.001). Conclusions: Physiological variability may explain the similar increases among patients who did not receive contrast versus patients who had not yet received contrast. Hydration therapy may explain the milder and fewer increases after contrast. Only a randomized clinical trial can determine whether acute kidney injuries are caused by contrast; these results support equipoise for such a trial.",
author = "Nabeel Sarwani and Michael Bruno and Marco Huesch",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1285--1292",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Retrospective Comparison of Creatinine Changes Among Patients Receiving, Not Receiving, and Not Yet Receiving Contrast Administration

AU - Sarwani, Nabeel

AU - Bruno, Michael

AU - Huesch, Marco

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Objective: We sought to compare variability in serum creatinine among inpatients in our institution receiving contrast imaging studies and among inpatients not receiving such studies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-site, multiple-cohort study in a 550-bed academic medical center in October 2016 used the electronic medical record data to analyze the greatest absolute and relative changes in serum creatinine over periods no longer than 48 hours (1) during the admission for 1,134 patients who did not receive a contrast imaging study, (2) before the earliest contrast study for 155 patients who had not yet had a scheduled contrast examination, and (3) straddling the time when 266 patients received their earliest contrast study. We compared creatinine changes in the first cohort with those in the second and the third using histograms and t tests. Results: Among those who did not receive contrast, 18.3% had a creatinine increase of greater than 0.3 mg/dL, and before contrast, 14.2% had such increases (P =.22). After contrast, 6.4% had increases at least this great (P <.001). Patients with increases in creatinine before contrast tended to have such increases after as well (Pearson's 0.48, P <.001). Conclusions: Physiological variability may explain the similar increases among patients who did not receive contrast versus patients who had not yet received contrast. Hydration therapy may explain the milder and fewer increases after contrast. Only a randomized clinical trial can determine whether acute kidney injuries are caused by contrast; these results support equipoise for such a trial.

AB - Objective: We sought to compare variability in serum creatinine among inpatients in our institution receiving contrast imaging studies and among inpatients not receiving such studies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-site, multiple-cohort study in a 550-bed academic medical center in October 2016 used the electronic medical record data to analyze the greatest absolute and relative changes in serum creatinine over periods no longer than 48 hours (1) during the admission for 1,134 patients who did not receive a contrast imaging study, (2) before the earliest contrast study for 155 patients who had not yet had a scheduled contrast examination, and (3) straddling the time when 266 patients received their earliest contrast study. We compared creatinine changes in the first cohort with those in the second and the third using histograms and t tests. Results: Among those who did not receive contrast, 18.3% had a creatinine increase of greater than 0.3 mg/dL, and before contrast, 14.2% had such increases (P =.22). After contrast, 6.4% had increases at least this great (P <.001). Patients with increases in creatinine before contrast tended to have such increases after as well (Pearson's 0.48, P <.001). Conclusions: Physiological variability may explain the similar increases among patients who did not receive contrast versus patients who had not yet received contrast. Hydration therapy may explain the milder and fewer increases after contrast. Only a randomized clinical trial can determine whether acute kidney injuries are caused by contrast; these results support equipoise for such a trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042561249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042561249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 29503148

AN - SCOPUS:85042561249

VL - 15

SP - 1285

EP - 1292

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 9

ER -