A retrospective review of temporal bone imaging with respect to bone-anchored hearing aid placement

Aaron R. Baker, David G. Fanelli, Sangam Kanekar, Huseyin Isildak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Current bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) guidelines recommend placement of the titanium implant 5 to 7 cm posterior to the ear canal. Previous studies show that bone conducted hearing is maximized the closer the transducer is to the cochlea. We aim to investigate the position of the sigmoid sinus with respect to BAHA implants to determine whether they may be safely placed closer to the ear canal in patients with chronic ear disease, enhancing the amplification available to the patient. Study Design: We performed a retrospective review of highresolution temporal bone computed tomographies (CTs), comparing multiple measurements between ears with chronic ear disease and normal controls. Setting: Images were obtained at a single academic medical center. Patients: Eighty patients (160 ears) with temporal bone CTs performed between 2006 and 2009 were measured. Patients with chronic ear disease were identified by international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, revision 9 code and confirmation by review of the imaging. Main Outcome Measures: Measurements were made on axial CT slices from a point 1 cm posterior to the sigmoid sinus to the posterior margin of the external canal. The squamous temporal bone thickness was also measured at this point. Results: Forty-seven patients (55 ears) had chronic ear disease. Distance from the posterior canal was significantly different between normal and diseased ears (36.3mm versus 33.5 mm, p<0.001). Squamous temporal bone thickness varied widely, and was similar between groups (6.9mm versus 6.8 mm, p=0.76). Conclusions: According to our data, titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids may be safely placed closer to the external canal than the current recommendations. This could allow for better transduction as well as sound localization in BAHA patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-88
Number of pages3
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hearing Aids
Temporal Bone
Ear Diseases
Bone and Bones
Chronic Disease
Ear
Ear Canal
Tomography
Sigmoid Colon
Titanium
Sound Localization
Cochlea
International Classification of Diseases
Transducers
Hearing
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{7d2c583670c0459782e05ed228a7453f,
title = "A retrospective review of temporal bone imaging with respect to bone-anchored hearing aid placement",
abstract = "Objective: Current bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) guidelines recommend placement of the titanium implant 5 to 7 cm posterior to the ear canal. Previous studies show that bone conducted hearing is maximized the closer the transducer is to the cochlea. We aim to investigate the position of the sigmoid sinus with respect to BAHA implants to determine whether they may be safely placed closer to the ear canal in patients with chronic ear disease, enhancing the amplification available to the patient. Study Design: We performed a retrospective review of highresolution temporal bone computed tomographies (CTs), comparing multiple measurements between ears with chronic ear disease and normal controls. Setting: Images were obtained at a single academic medical center. Patients: Eighty patients (160 ears) with temporal bone CTs performed between 2006 and 2009 were measured. Patients with chronic ear disease were identified by international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, revision 9 code and confirmation by review of the imaging. Main Outcome Measures: Measurements were made on axial CT slices from a point 1 cm posterior to the sigmoid sinus to the posterior margin of the external canal. The squamous temporal bone thickness was also measured at this point. Results: Forty-seven patients (55 ears) had chronic ear disease. Distance from the posterior canal was significantly different between normal and diseased ears (36.3mm versus 33.5 mm, p<0.001). Squamous temporal bone thickness varied widely, and was similar between groups (6.9mm versus 6.8 mm, p=0.76). Conclusions: According to our data, titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids may be safely placed closer to the external canal than the current recommendations. This could allow for better transduction as well as sound localization in BAHA patients.",
author = "Baker, {Aaron R.} and Fanelli, {David G.} and Sangam Kanekar and Huseyin Isildak",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0000000000001235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "86--88",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

A retrospective review of temporal bone imaging with respect to bone-anchored hearing aid placement. / Baker, Aaron R.; Fanelli, David G.; Kanekar, Sangam; Isildak, Huseyin.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 86-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A retrospective review of temporal bone imaging with respect to bone-anchored hearing aid placement

AU - Baker, Aaron R.

AU - Fanelli, David G.

AU - Kanekar, Sangam

AU - Isildak, Huseyin

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: Current bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) guidelines recommend placement of the titanium implant 5 to 7 cm posterior to the ear canal. Previous studies show that bone conducted hearing is maximized the closer the transducer is to the cochlea. We aim to investigate the position of the sigmoid sinus with respect to BAHA implants to determine whether they may be safely placed closer to the ear canal in patients with chronic ear disease, enhancing the amplification available to the patient. Study Design: We performed a retrospective review of highresolution temporal bone computed tomographies (CTs), comparing multiple measurements between ears with chronic ear disease and normal controls. Setting: Images were obtained at a single academic medical center. Patients: Eighty patients (160 ears) with temporal bone CTs performed between 2006 and 2009 were measured. Patients with chronic ear disease were identified by international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, revision 9 code and confirmation by review of the imaging. Main Outcome Measures: Measurements were made on axial CT slices from a point 1 cm posterior to the sigmoid sinus to the posterior margin of the external canal. The squamous temporal bone thickness was also measured at this point. Results: Forty-seven patients (55 ears) had chronic ear disease. Distance from the posterior canal was significantly different between normal and diseased ears (36.3mm versus 33.5 mm, p<0.001). Squamous temporal bone thickness varied widely, and was similar between groups (6.9mm versus 6.8 mm, p=0.76). Conclusions: According to our data, titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids may be safely placed closer to the external canal than the current recommendations. This could allow for better transduction as well as sound localization in BAHA patients.

AB - Objective: Current bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) guidelines recommend placement of the titanium implant 5 to 7 cm posterior to the ear canal. Previous studies show that bone conducted hearing is maximized the closer the transducer is to the cochlea. We aim to investigate the position of the sigmoid sinus with respect to BAHA implants to determine whether they may be safely placed closer to the ear canal in patients with chronic ear disease, enhancing the amplification available to the patient. Study Design: We performed a retrospective review of highresolution temporal bone computed tomographies (CTs), comparing multiple measurements between ears with chronic ear disease and normal controls. Setting: Images were obtained at a single academic medical center. Patients: Eighty patients (160 ears) with temporal bone CTs performed between 2006 and 2009 were measured. Patients with chronic ear disease were identified by international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, revision 9 code and confirmation by review of the imaging. Main Outcome Measures: Measurements were made on axial CT slices from a point 1 cm posterior to the sigmoid sinus to the posterior margin of the external canal. The squamous temporal bone thickness was also measured at this point. Results: Forty-seven patients (55 ears) had chronic ear disease. Distance from the posterior canal was significantly different between normal and diseased ears (36.3mm versus 33.5 mm, p<0.001). Squamous temporal bone thickness varied widely, and was similar between groups (6.9mm versus 6.8 mm, p=0.76). Conclusions: According to our data, titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids may be safely placed closer to the external canal than the current recommendations. This could allow for better transduction as well as sound localization in BAHA patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991511105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991511105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001235

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001235

M3 - Article

C2 - 27755364

AN - SCOPUS:84991511105

VL - 38

SP - 86

EP - 88

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 1

ER -