A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work

Anja Van den Broeck, D. Lance Ferris, Chu Hsiang Chang, Christopher C. Rosen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

136 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-determination theory (SDT) conceptualizes basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as innate and essential for ongoing psychological growth, internalization, and well-being. We broadly review the literature on basic psychological need satisfaction at work with three more specific aims: to test SDT’s requirement that each basic psychological need should uniquely predict psychological growth, internalization, and well-being; to test whether use of an overall need satisfaction measure is appropriate; and to test whether the scale used to assess basic psychological needs influenced our results. To this end, we conducted a meta-analytic review of 99 studies with 119 distinct samples examining the antecedents and consequences of basic need satisfaction. We conclude with recommendations for addressing issues arising from our review and also identify points for future research, including the study of need frustration and culture, integrating the basic needs with other motivation theories, and a caution regarding the measures and methods used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1195-1229
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Management
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Self-determination
Psychological
Internalization
Well-being
Autonomy
Self-determination theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
Van den Broeck, Anja ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Chang, Chu Hsiang ; Rosen, Christopher C. / A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work. In: Journal of Management. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 1195-1229.
@article{44e53df0d3664fa0ab2ff0bdb1d4bf16,
title = "A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work",
abstract = "Self-determination theory (SDT) conceptualizes basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as innate and essential for ongoing psychological growth, internalization, and well-being. We broadly review the literature on basic psychological need satisfaction at work with three more specific aims: to test SDT’s requirement that each basic psychological need should uniquely predict psychological growth, internalization, and well-being; to test whether use of an overall need satisfaction measure is appropriate; and to test whether the scale used to assess basic psychological needs influenced our results. To this end, we conducted a meta-analytic review of 99 studies with 119 distinct samples examining the antecedents and consequences of basic need satisfaction. We conclude with recommendations for addressing issues arising from our review and also identify points for future research, including the study of need frustration and culture, integrating the basic needs with other motivation theories, and a caution regarding the measures and methods used.",
author = "{Van den Broeck}, Anja and Ferris, {D. Lance} and Chang, {Chu Hsiang} and Rosen, {Christopher C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206316632058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1195--1229",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Van den Broeck, A, Ferris, DL, Chang, CH & Rosen, CC 2016, 'A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work', Journal of Management, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work. / Van den Broeck, Anja; Ferris, D. Lance; Chang, Chu Hsiang; Rosen, Christopher C.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 42, No. 5, 01.07.2016, p. 1195-1229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work

AU - Van den Broeck, Anja

AU - Ferris, D. Lance

AU - Chang, Chu Hsiang

AU - Rosen, Christopher C.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Self-determination theory (SDT) conceptualizes basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as innate and essential for ongoing psychological growth, internalization, and well-being. We broadly review the literature on basic psychological need satisfaction at work with three more specific aims: to test SDT’s requirement that each basic psychological need should uniquely predict psychological growth, internalization, and well-being; to test whether use of an overall need satisfaction measure is appropriate; and to test whether the scale used to assess basic psychological needs influenced our results. To this end, we conducted a meta-analytic review of 99 studies with 119 distinct samples examining the antecedents and consequences of basic need satisfaction. We conclude with recommendations for addressing issues arising from our review and also identify points for future research, including the study of need frustration and culture, integrating the basic needs with other motivation theories, and a caution regarding the measures and methods used.

AB - Self-determination theory (SDT) conceptualizes basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as innate and essential for ongoing psychological growth, internalization, and well-being. We broadly review the literature on basic psychological need satisfaction at work with three more specific aims: to test SDT’s requirement that each basic psychological need should uniquely predict psychological growth, internalization, and well-being; to test whether use of an overall need satisfaction measure is appropriate; and to test whether the scale used to assess basic psychological needs influenced our results. To this end, we conducted a meta-analytic review of 99 studies with 119 distinct samples examining the antecedents and consequences of basic need satisfaction. We conclude with recommendations for addressing issues arising from our review and also identify points for future research, including the study of need frustration and culture, integrating the basic needs with other motivation theories, and a caution regarding the measures and methods used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977120251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977120251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206316632058

DO - 10.1177/0149206316632058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977120251

VL - 42

SP - 1195

EP - 1229

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 5

ER -