A Right to Die? Ethical Dilemmas of Euthanasia

DIANNE E. ALBRIGHT, Richard Hazler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Euthanasia is considered an important social issue of the 1990s. Mental health professionals should understand the differences between voluntary, involuntary, passive, and active euthanasia; mercy killing, and assisted suicide. This article encourages counselors to ethically formulate client‐supportive positions to help clients face life‐and‐death decisions. 1995 American Counseling Association

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-189
Number of pages13
JournalCounseling and Values
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Right to Die
Euthanasia
Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
Passive Euthanasia
Active Euthanasia
Assisted Suicide
Counseling
Mental Health
Ethical Dilemmas

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Religious studies

Cite this

ALBRIGHT, DIANNE E. ; Hazler, Richard. / A Right to Die? Ethical Dilemmas of Euthanasia. In: Counseling and Values. 1995 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 177-189.
@article{9269f908e58146f399f3804e71d4f32e,
title = "A Right to Die?: Ethical Dilemmas of Euthanasia",
abstract = "Euthanasia is considered an important social issue of the 1990s. Mental health professionals should understand the differences between voluntary, involuntary, passive, and active euthanasia; mercy killing, and assisted suicide. This article encourages counselors to ethically formulate client‐supportive positions to help clients face life‐and‐death decisions. 1995 American Counseling Association",
author = "ALBRIGHT, {DIANNE E.} and Richard Hazler",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/j.2161-007X.1995.tb00940.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "177--189",
journal = "Counseling and Values",
issn = "0160-7960",
publisher = "American Counseling Association",
number = "3",

}

A Right to Die? Ethical Dilemmas of Euthanasia. / ALBRIGHT, DIANNE E.; Hazler, Richard.

In: Counseling and Values, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 177-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Right to Die?

T2 - Ethical Dilemmas of Euthanasia

AU - ALBRIGHT, DIANNE E.

AU - Hazler, Richard

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Euthanasia is considered an important social issue of the 1990s. Mental health professionals should understand the differences between voluntary, involuntary, passive, and active euthanasia; mercy killing, and assisted suicide. This article encourages counselors to ethically formulate client‐supportive positions to help clients face life‐and‐death decisions. 1995 American Counseling Association

AB - Euthanasia is considered an important social issue of the 1990s. Mental health professionals should understand the differences between voluntary, involuntary, passive, and active euthanasia; mercy killing, and assisted suicide. This article encourages counselors to ethically formulate client‐supportive positions to help clients face life‐and‐death decisions. 1995 American Counseling Association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990623929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990623929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/j.2161-007X.1995.tb00940.x

DO - 10.1002/j.2161-007X.1995.tb00940.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990623929

VL - 39

SP - 177

EP - 189

JO - Counseling and Values

JF - Counseling and Values

SN - 0160-7960

IS - 3

ER -