A rule-based lens model

Jing Yin, Ling Rothrock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a novel approach, called the rule-based lens model (RLM) to model human judgment of a probabilistic criterion. Our method is motivated by a shortcoming of an existing linear-additive model of judgment based on the lens model equation (LME) to adequately represent all rule-based relationships. Through the use of a simple example, we demonstrate the shortcoming of the additive model and set the context for our generalized rule-based formulation of Brunswik's conceptual lens model. To investigate the behavior of our model and the relationship to the traditional lens model based on the LME, we simulate human judgments and criterion values in a "drosophila" domain where the parameters of the problem in terms of the number of cues, organizing principle of the criterion, organizing principle of the judge and the extent of uncertainty within the system can be systematically varied. Our efforts represent a first step toward the formulation of a generalized lens model framework. Relevance to industry: The findings of the proposed research would provide theoretical basis toward the design of decision-aiding and decision-training systems that are adapted to human decision strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-509
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006

Fingerprint

Lenses
Drosophila
Uncertainty
Cues
Linear Models
Industry
linear model
Research
uncertainty
industry
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{83cf84dddb734938aad124ed4efbbbf0,
title = "A rule-based lens model",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to introduce a novel approach, called the rule-based lens model (RLM) to model human judgment of a probabilistic criterion. Our method is motivated by a shortcoming of an existing linear-additive model of judgment based on the lens model equation (LME) to adequately represent all rule-based relationships. Through the use of a simple example, we demonstrate the shortcoming of the additive model and set the context for our generalized rule-based formulation of Brunswik's conceptual lens model. To investigate the behavior of our model and the relationship to the traditional lens model based on the LME, we simulate human judgments and criterion values in a {"}drosophila{"} domain where the parameters of the problem in terms of the number of cues, organizing principle of the criterion, organizing principle of the judge and the extent of uncertainty within the system can be systematically varied. Our efforts represent a first step toward the formulation of a generalized lens model framework. Relevance to industry: The findings of the proposed research would provide theoretical basis toward the design of decision-aiding and decision-training systems that are adapted to human decision strategies.",
author = "Jing Yin and Ling Rothrock",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "499--509",
journal = "International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics",
issn = "0169-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

A rule-based lens model. / Yin, Jing; Rothrock, Ling.

In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.05.2006, p. 499-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A rule-based lens model

AU - Yin, Jing

AU - Rothrock, Ling

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a novel approach, called the rule-based lens model (RLM) to model human judgment of a probabilistic criterion. Our method is motivated by a shortcoming of an existing linear-additive model of judgment based on the lens model equation (LME) to adequately represent all rule-based relationships. Through the use of a simple example, we demonstrate the shortcoming of the additive model and set the context for our generalized rule-based formulation of Brunswik's conceptual lens model. To investigate the behavior of our model and the relationship to the traditional lens model based on the LME, we simulate human judgments and criterion values in a "drosophila" domain where the parameters of the problem in terms of the number of cues, organizing principle of the criterion, organizing principle of the judge and the extent of uncertainty within the system can be systematically varied. Our efforts represent a first step toward the formulation of a generalized lens model framework. Relevance to industry: The findings of the proposed research would provide theoretical basis toward the design of decision-aiding and decision-training systems that are adapted to human decision strategies.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a novel approach, called the rule-based lens model (RLM) to model human judgment of a probabilistic criterion. Our method is motivated by a shortcoming of an existing linear-additive model of judgment based on the lens model equation (LME) to adequately represent all rule-based relationships. Through the use of a simple example, we demonstrate the shortcoming of the additive model and set the context for our generalized rule-based formulation of Brunswik's conceptual lens model. To investigate the behavior of our model and the relationship to the traditional lens model based on the LME, we simulate human judgments and criterion values in a "drosophila" domain where the parameters of the problem in terms of the number of cues, organizing principle of the criterion, organizing principle of the judge and the extent of uncertainty within the system can be systematically varied. Our efforts represent a first step toward the formulation of a generalized lens model framework. Relevance to industry: The findings of the proposed research would provide theoretical basis toward the design of decision-aiding and decision-training systems that are adapted to human decision strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646090417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646090417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646090417

VL - 36

SP - 499

EP - 509

JO - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

SN - 0169-8141

IS - 5

ER -