A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate

Eric J. Barron, Peter J. Fawcett, William H. Peterson, David Pollard, Starley L. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

166 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of general circulation model experiments utilizing GENESIS have been completed for the mid‐Cretaceous based on geography, variable atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (2 to 6 times present‐day concentrations), and variable poleward oceanic heat flux (.6 to 1.2 × 1015 W increased from present day). By combining all three major variables (CO2, geography, and oceanic heat flux), the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous temperatures can be achieved. in the simulations, increased CO2 is required to promote global warmth, and increased oceanic heat flux is required to prevent the tropics from overheating with higher levels of CO2. Four times present‐day CO2 with 1.2 × 1015 W provided the best match to the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous data. The best match to the Cretaceous observations was achieved with a globally averaged surface temperature increase of 6.2°C, at the lower end of past estimates of mid‐Cretaceous warmth. This value may be a better estimate of mid‐Cretaceous global warming. Finally, the model experiments can be used to provide a “paleocalibration” of the global warming expected for a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The best estimates for the mid‐Cretaceous appear to be a 2.5 to 4.0°C sensitivity, in the mid to upper range of the sensitivity of current climate models used to assess future global change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)953-962
Number of pages10
JournalPaleoceanography
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

heat flux
global warming
climate
carbon dioxide
simulation
global change
general circulation model
climate modeling
surface temperature
experiment
Cretaceous
temperature
distribution
geography
tropics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oceanography
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Barron, E. J., Fawcett, P. J., Peterson, W. H., Pollard, D., & Thompson, S. L. (1995). A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate. Paleoceanography, 10(5), 953-962. https://doi.org/10.1029/95PA01624
Barron, Eric J. ; Fawcett, Peter J. ; Peterson, William H. ; Pollard, David ; Thompson, Starley L. / A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate. In: Paleoceanography. 1995 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. 953-962.
@article{36088a830296407a8cb86a3b640a272d,
title = "A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate",
abstract = "A series of general circulation model experiments utilizing GENESIS have been completed for the mid‐Cretaceous based on geography, variable atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (2 to 6 times present‐day concentrations), and variable poleward oceanic heat flux (.6 to 1.2 × 1015 W increased from present day). By combining all three major variables (CO2, geography, and oceanic heat flux), the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous temperatures can be achieved. in the simulations, increased CO2 is required to promote global warmth, and increased oceanic heat flux is required to prevent the tropics from overheating with higher levels of CO2. Four times present‐day CO2 with 1.2 × 1015 W provided the best match to the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous data. The best match to the Cretaceous observations was achieved with a globally averaged surface temperature increase of 6.2°C, at the lower end of past estimates of mid‐Cretaceous warmth. This value may be a better estimate of mid‐Cretaceous global warming. Finally, the model experiments can be used to provide a “paleocalibration” of the global warming expected for a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The best estimates for the mid‐Cretaceous appear to be a 2.5 to 4.0°C sensitivity, in the mid to upper range of the sensitivity of current climate models used to assess future global change.",
author = "Barron, {Eric J.} and Fawcett, {Peter J.} and Peterson, {William H.} and David Pollard and Thompson, {Starley L.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/95PA01624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "953--962",
journal = "Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology",
issn = "0883-8305",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "5",

}

Barron, EJ, Fawcett, PJ, Peterson, WH, Pollard, D & Thompson, SL 1995, 'A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate', Paleoceanography, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 953-962. https://doi.org/10.1029/95PA01624

A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate. / Barron, Eric J.; Fawcett, Peter J.; Peterson, William H.; Pollard, David; Thompson, Starley L.

In: Paleoceanography, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.01.1995, p. 953-962.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate

AU - Barron, Eric J.

AU - Fawcett, Peter J.

AU - Peterson, William H.

AU - Pollard, David

AU - Thompson, Starley L.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - A series of general circulation model experiments utilizing GENESIS have been completed for the mid‐Cretaceous based on geography, variable atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (2 to 6 times present‐day concentrations), and variable poleward oceanic heat flux (.6 to 1.2 × 1015 W increased from present day). By combining all three major variables (CO2, geography, and oceanic heat flux), the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous temperatures can be achieved. in the simulations, increased CO2 is required to promote global warmth, and increased oceanic heat flux is required to prevent the tropics from overheating with higher levels of CO2. Four times present‐day CO2 with 1.2 × 1015 W provided the best match to the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous data. The best match to the Cretaceous observations was achieved with a globally averaged surface temperature increase of 6.2°C, at the lower end of past estimates of mid‐Cretaceous warmth. This value may be a better estimate of mid‐Cretaceous global warming. Finally, the model experiments can be used to provide a “paleocalibration” of the global warming expected for a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The best estimates for the mid‐Cretaceous appear to be a 2.5 to 4.0°C sensitivity, in the mid to upper range of the sensitivity of current climate models used to assess future global change.

AB - A series of general circulation model experiments utilizing GENESIS have been completed for the mid‐Cretaceous based on geography, variable atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (2 to 6 times present‐day concentrations), and variable poleward oceanic heat flux (.6 to 1.2 × 1015 W increased from present day). By combining all three major variables (CO2, geography, and oceanic heat flux), the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous temperatures can be achieved. in the simulations, increased CO2 is required to promote global warmth, and increased oceanic heat flux is required to prevent the tropics from overheating with higher levels of CO2. Four times present‐day CO2 with 1.2 × 1015 W provided the best match to the distribution of mid‐Cretaceous data. The best match to the Cretaceous observations was achieved with a globally averaged surface temperature increase of 6.2°C, at the lower end of past estimates of mid‐Cretaceous warmth. This value may be a better estimate of mid‐Cretaceous global warming. Finally, the model experiments can be used to provide a “paleocalibration” of the global warming expected for a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The best estimates for the mid‐Cretaceous appear to be a 2.5 to 4.0°C sensitivity, in the mid to upper range of the sensitivity of current climate models used to assess future global change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029526384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029526384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/95PA01624

DO - 10.1029/95PA01624

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029526384

VL - 10

SP - 953

EP - 962

JO - Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology

JF - Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology

SN - 0883-8305

IS - 5

ER -

Barron EJ, Fawcett PJ, Peterson WH, Pollard D, Thompson SL. A “simulation” of Mid‐Cretaceous climate. Paleoceanography. 1995 Jan 1;10(5):953-962. https://doi.org/10.1029/95PA01624