TY - JOUR
T1 - A soft-contact and wrench based approach to study grasp planning and execution
AU - Singh, Tarkeshwar
AU - Ambike, Satyajit
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Drs. Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky and Mark Latash for inputs and for allowing us to reanalyze data ( Figs. 4–6 ) from a previously published study ( Singh et al., 2013 ). The study was in part supported by NIH grants AG-018751 , NS-035032 , and AR-048563 to Drs. Zatsiorsky and Latash.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/11/5
Y1 - 2015/11/5
N2 - Grasping research in robotics has made remarkable progress in the last three decades and sophisticated computational tools are now available for planning robotic grasping in complex environments. However, studying the neural control of prehension in humans is more complex than studying robotic grasping. The elaborate musculoskeletal geometries and complex neural inputs to the hand facilitate a symphonic interplay of power and precision that allows humans to grasp fragile objects in a stable way without either crushing or dropping them. Most prehension studies have focused on a planar simplification of prehension since planar analyses render the complex problem of prehension tractable with few variables. The caveat is that planar simplification allows researchers to ask only a limited set of questions. In fact, one of the problems with extending prehension studies to three dimensions is the lack of analytical tools for quantifying features of spatial prehension. The current paper provides a theoretical adaptation and a step-by-step implementation of a widely used soft-contact wrench model for spatial human prehension. We propose two indices, grasp caliber and grasp intensity, to quantitatively relate digit placement and digit forces to grasp stability. Grasp caliber is the smallest singular value of the grasp matrix and it indicates the proximity of the current grasp configuration to instability. Grasp intensity is the magnitude of the excessive wrench applied by the digits to counter perturbations. Apart from quantifying stability of spatial grasps, these indices can also be applied to investigate sensory-motor coupling and the role of perception in grasp planning.
AB - Grasping research in robotics has made remarkable progress in the last three decades and sophisticated computational tools are now available for planning robotic grasping in complex environments. However, studying the neural control of prehension in humans is more complex than studying robotic grasping. The elaborate musculoskeletal geometries and complex neural inputs to the hand facilitate a symphonic interplay of power and precision that allows humans to grasp fragile objects in a stable way without either crushing or dropping them. Most prehension studies have focused on a planar simplification of prehension since planar analyses render the complex problem of prehension tractable with few variables. The caveat is that planar simplification allows researchers to ask only a limited set of questions. In fact, one of the problems with extending prehension studies to three dimensions is the lack of analytical tools for quantifying features of spatial prehension. The current paper provides a theoretical adaptation and a step-by-step implementation of a widely used soft-contact wrench model for spatial human prehension. We propose two indices, grasp caliber and grasp intensity, to quantitatively relate digit placement and digit forces to grasp stability. Grasp caliber is the smallest singular value of the grasp matrix and it indicates the proximity of the current grasp configuration to instability. Grasp intensity is the magnitude of the excessive wrench applied by the digits to counter perturbations. Apart from quantifying stability of spatial grasps, these indices can also be applied to investigate sensory-motor coupling and the role of perception in grasp planning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947125303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947125303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 26475219
AN - SCOPUS:84947125303
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 48
SP - 3961
EP - 3967
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 14
ER -