A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community

Donald C. Hambrick, Craig Crossland

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite widespread interest in “behavioral strategy,” it is not clear what this term, or its associated academic subfield, is all about. Unless a critical mass of scholars can agree on the meaning of behavioral strategy, and professionally identify with it, this embryonic community may face a marginal existence. We describe three alternative conceptions for the academic subfield of behavioral strategy, along with assessments of the pros and cons of each. The “small tent” version amounts to a direct transposition of the logic of behavioral economics to the field of strategic management, specifically in the style of behavioral decision research. The “midsize tent” view is that behavioral strategy is a commitment to understanding the psychology of strategists. And the “large tent’ view includes consideration of any and all psychological, sociological, and political factors that influence strategic outcomes. We conclude that the midsize tent represents the best path forward, not too narrow and not too broad, allowing rich scope but with coherence. The large tent conception of behavioral strategy, however, is not out of the question and warrants serious consideration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Strategic Management
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Pages23-39
Number of pages17
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Publication series

NameAdvances in Strategic Management
Volume39
ISSN (Print)0742-3322

Fingerprint

Conception
Psychological
Influence factors
Strategic management
Critical mass
Logic
Warrants
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Hambrick, D. C., & Crossland, C. (2018). A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. In Advances in Strategic Management (pp. 23-39). (Advances in Strategic Management; Vol. 39). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000039002
Hambrick, Donald C. ; Crossland, Craig. / A strategy for behavioral strategy : Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. Advances in Strategic Management. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2018. pp. 23-39 (Advances in Strategic Management).
@inbook{bf2d136f87aa4ae6af0e3230bfb9cf5c,
title = "A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community",
abstract = "Despite widespread interest in “behavioral strategy,” it is not clear what this term, or its associated academic subfield, is all about. Unless a critical mass of scholars can agree on the meaning of behavioral strategy, and professionally identify with it, this embryonic community may face a marginal existence. We describe three alternative conceptions for the academic subfield of behavioral strategy, along with assessments of the pros and cons of each. The “small tent” version amounts to a direct transposition of the logic of behavioral economics to the field of strategic management, specifically in the style of behavioral decision research. The “midsize tent” view is that behavioral strategy is a commitment to understanding the psychology of strategists. And the “large tent’ view includes consideration of any and all psychological, sociological, and political factors that influence strategic outcomes. We conclude that the midsize tent represents the best path forward, not too narrow and not too broad, allowing rich scope but with coherence. The large tent conception of behavioral strategy, however, is not out of the question and warrants serious consideration.",
author = "Hambrick, {Donald C.} and Craig Crossland",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S0742-332220180000039002",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Advances in Strategic Management",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
pages = "23--39",
booktitle = "Advances in Strategic Management",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Hambrick, DC & Crossland, C 2018, A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. in Advances in Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 39, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., pp. 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000039002

A strategy for behavioral strategy : Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. / Hambrick, Donald C.; Crossland, Craig.

Advances in Strategic Management. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2018. p. 23-39 (Advances in Strategic Management; Vol. 39).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - A strategy for behavioral strategy

T2 - Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community

AU - Hambrick, Donald C.

AU - Crossland, Craig

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Despite widespread interest in “behavioral strategy,” it is not clear what this term, or its associated academic subfield, is all about. Unless a critical mass of scholars can agree on the meaning of behavioral strategy, and professionally identify with it, this embryonic community may face a marginal existence. We describe three alternative conceptions for the academic subfield of behavioral strategy, along with assessments of the pros and cons of each. The “small tent” version amounts to a direct transposition of the logic of behavioral economics to the field of strategic management, specifically in the style of behavioral decision research. The “midsize tent” view is that behavioral strategy is a commitment to understanding the psychology of strategists. And the “large tent’ view includes consideration of any and all psychological, sociological, and political factors that influence strategic outcomes. We conclude that the midsize tent represents the best path forward, not too narrow and not too broad, allowing rich scope but with coherence. The large tent conception of behavioral strategy, however, is not out of the question and warrants serious consideration.

AB - Despite widespread interest in “behavioral strategy,” it is not clear what this term, or its associated academic subfield, is all about. Unless a critical mass of scholars can agree on the meaning of behavioral strategy, and professionally identify with it, this embryonic community may face a marginal existence. We describe three alternative conceptions for the academic subfield of behavioral strategy, along with assessments of the pros and cons of each. The “small tent” version amounts to a direct transposition of the logic of behavioral economics to the field of strategic management, specifically in the style of behavioral decision research. The “midsize tent” view is that behavioral strategy is a commitment to understanding the psychology of strategists. And the “large tent’ view includes consideration of any and all psychological, sociological, and political factors that influence strategic outcomes. We conclude that the midsize tent represents the best path forward, not too narrow and not too broad, allowing rich scope but with coherence. The large tent conception of behavioral strategy, however, is not out of the question and warrants serious consideration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064525764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064525764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S0742-332220180000039002

DO - 10.1108/S0742-332220180000039002

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85064525764

T3 - Advances in Strategic Management

SP - 23

EP - 39

BT - Advances in Strategic Management

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

ER -

Hambrick DC, Crossland C. A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. In Advances in Strategic Management. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2018. p. 23-39. (Advances in Strategic Management). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000039002