A survey of dermatology resident education in cosmetic procedures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The demands for cosmetic procedures are increasing. Dermatologists perform many of these procedures, therefore adequate education and training during residency is important. Surveys demonstrate dermatology residents desire more training even while faculty members believe this has already become a more prominent feature of resident education. Objective: We sought to assess the time and methods dedicated to education and training of cosmetic procedures in dermatology residency. Methods: A 26-question survey was developed and electronically distributed in May 2010 to dermatology program directors via the Association of Professors of Dermatology list-serve with their approval. Program directors were asked to forward the e-mail to their instructors of cosmetic/procedural dermatology, and chief residents. Responses were anonymous. Results: A total of 86 responses were collected. In all, 67% (n = 54) of respondents had formal lectures focusing on cosmetic dermatology. Lecture topics reported by more than 50% of respondents included botulinum toxin injection, lasers, soft tissue augmentation, chemical peels, and sclerotherapy. Topics such as dermabrasion, liposuction, and scar revision were less commonly taught. The most commonly encountered and performed procedures were botulinum toxin injection and lasers (100%, n = 86); 98.8% (n = 85) encounter soft tissue augmentation and 95.4% (n = 82) encounter both chemical peels and sclerotherapy. Resident experience performing procedures as the first assistant or as the first surgeon varied widely. Limitations: The limitations of this study are that the data were subjectively reported so results may differ from the true amount of time spent in any activity. The data may be biased by the population that responded as they may have strong opinions supporting or opposing training in cosmetic procedures. The data also may have been skewed by the small percentage of participants who were instructors of cosmetic dermatology (21%), chief residents (20%), and others respondents (8% total). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the variability of training in cosmetic procedures. The challenge for programs is to find the balance between insufficiency and overemphasis. The results of this study will hopefully assist programs in determining the quantity and methods of resident training in cosmetic procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Dermatology
Cosmetics
Education
Sclerotherapy
Botulinum Toxins
Internship and Residency
Lasers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Dermabrasion
faropenem medoxomil
Lipectomy
Injections
Postal Service
Cicatrix

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology

Cite this

@article{bcd5983a10ef4be191a1325fff8f5f7f,
title = "A survey of dermatology resident education in cosmetic procedures",
abstract = "Background: The demands for cosmetic procedures are increasing. Dermatologists perform many of these procedures, therefore adequate education and training during residency is important. Surveys demonstrate dermatology residents desire more training even while faculty members believe this has already become a more prominent feature of resident education. Objective: We sought to assess the time and methods dedicated to education and training of cosmetic procedures in dermatology residency. Methods: A 26-question survey was developed and electronically distributed in May 2010 to dermatology program directors via the Association of Professors of Dermatology list-serve with their approval. Program directors were asked to forward the e-mail to their instructors of cosmetic/procedural dermatology, and chief residents. Responses were anonymous. Results: A total of 86 responses were collected. In all, 67{\%} (n = 54) of respondents had formal lectures focusing on cosmetic dermatology. Lecture topics reported by more than 50{\%} of respondents included botulinum toxin injection, lasers, soft tissue augmentation, chemical peels, and sclerotherapy. Topics such as dermabrasion, liposuction, and scar revision were less commonly taught. The most commonly encountered and performed procedures were botulinum toxin injection and lasers (100{\%}, n = 86); 98.8{\%} (n = 85) encounter soft tissue augmentation and 95.4{\%} (n = 82) encounter both chemical peels and sclerotherapy. Resident experience performing procedures as the first assistant or as the first surgeon varied widely. Limitations: The limitations of this study are that the data were subjectively reported so results may differ from the true amount of time spent in any activity. The data may be biased by the population that responded as they may have strong opinions supporting or opposing training in cosmetic procedures. The data also may have been skewed by the small percentage of participants who were instructors of cosmetic dermatology (21{\%}), chief residents (20{\%}), and others respondents (8{\%} total). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the variability of training in cosmetic procedures. The challenge for programs is to find the balance between insufficiency and overemphasis. The results of this study will hopefully assist programs in determining the quantity and methods of resident training in cosmetic procedures.",
author = "{Sciacca Kirby}, Joslyn and Adgerson, {Cheri N.} and Bryan Anderson",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology",
issn = "0190-9622",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A survey of dermatology resident education in cosmetic procedures. / Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn; Adgerson, Cheri N.; Anderson, Bryan.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 68, No. 2, 01.02.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of dermatology resident education in cosmetic procedures

AU - Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn

AU - Adgerson, Cheri N.

AU - Anderson, Bryan

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Background: The demands for cosmetic procedures are increasing. Dermatologists perform many of these procedures, therefore adequate education and training during residency is important. Surveys demonstrate dermatology residents desire more training even while faculty members believe this has already become a more prominent feature of resident education. Objective: We sought to assess the time and methods dedicated to education and training of cosmetic procedures in dermatology residency. Methods: A 26-question survey was developed and electronically distributed in May 2010 to dermatology program directors via the Association of Professors of Dermatology list-serve with their approval. Program directors were asked to forward the e-mail to their instructors of cosmetic/procedural dermatology, and chief residents. Responses were anonymous. Results: A total of 86 responses were collected. In all, 67% (n = 54) of respondents had formal lectures focusing on cosmetic dermatology. Lecture topics reported by more than 50% of respondents included botulinum toxin injection, lasers, soft tissue augmentation, chemical peels, and sclerotherapy. Topics such as dermabrasion, liposuction, and scar revision were less commonly taught. The most commonly encountered and performed procedures were botulinum toxin injection and lasers (100%, n = 86); 98.8% (n = 85) encounter soft tissue augmentation and 95.4% (n = 82) encounter both chemical peels and sclerotherapy. Resident experience performing procedures as the first assistant or as the first surgeon varied widely. Limitations: The limitations of this study are that the data were subjectively reported so results may differ from the true amount of time spent in any activity. The data may be biased by the population that responded as they may have strong opinions supporting or opposing training in cosmetic procedures. The data also may have been skewed by the small percentage of participants who were instructors of cosmetic dermatology (21%), chief residents (20%), and others respondents (8% total). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the variability of training in cosmetic procedures. The challenge for programs is to find the balance between insufficiency and overemphasis. The results of this study will hopefully assist programs in determining the quantity and methods of resident training in cosmetic procedures.

AB - Background: The demands for cosmetic procedures are increasing. Dermatologists perform many of these procedures, therefore adequate education and training during residency is important. Surveys demonstrate dermatology residents desire more training even while faculty members believe this has already become a more prominent feature of resident education. Objective: We sought to assess the time and methods dedicated to education and training of cosmetic procedures in dermatology residency. Methods: A 26-question survey was developed and electronically distributed in May 2010 to dermatology program directors via the Association of Professors of Dermatology list-serve with their approval. Program directors were asked to forward the e-mail to their instructors of cosmetic/procedural dermatology, and chief residents. Responses were anonymous. Results: A total of 86 responses were collected. In all, 67% (n = 54) of respondents had formal lectures focusing on cosmetic dermatology. Lecture topics reported by more than 50% of respondents included botulinum toxin injection, lasers, soft tissue augmentation, chemical peels, and sclerotherapy. Topics such as dermabrasion, liposuction, and scar revision were less commonly taught. The most commonly encountered and performed procedures were botulinum toxin injection and lasers (100%, n = 86); 98.8% (n = 85) encounter soft tissue augmentation and 95.4% (n = 82) encounter both chemical peels and sclerotherapy. Resident experience performing procedures as the first assistant or as the first surgeon varied widely. Limitations: The limitations of this study are that the data were subjectively reported so results may differ from the true amount of time spent in any activity. The data may be biased by the population that responded as they may have strong opinions supporting or opposing training in cosmetic procedures. The data also may have been skewed by the small percentage of participants who were instructors of cosmetic dermatology (21%), chief residents (20%), and others respondents (8% total). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the variability of training in cosmetic procedures. The challenge for programs is to find the balance between insufficiency and overemphasis. The results of this study will hopefully assist programs in determining the quantity and methods of resident training in cosmetic procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872304326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872304326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 23098638

AN - SCOPUS:84872304326

VL - 68

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

SN - 0190-9622

IS - 2

ER -