A Tale of Two Cultures

Consumer Reactance and Willingness to Book Fenced Rates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rate fences are integral to the practice of revenue management. Prior research suggests that cross-cultural differences in consumer reaction to rate fences exist but little is known about why this is so. This research employed two experimental studies with consumers from the United States and South Korea to explore the mechanisms underlying cultural differences in consumer reaction to nonphysical and physical rate fences. In Study 1, we found that feelings of reactance mediate the restriction-based nonphysical rate fence-willingness to book relationship for highly individualistic cultures, but not for highly collectivist cultures. Study 2’s findings suggest that consumers from low-context cultures favor product-based, over service-based, physical rate fences, while consumers from high-context cultures are unlikely to react differently to product-based, and service-based, physical rate fences. Together, the findings of Study 1 and Study 2 provide tourism managers a framework within which geolocation-based pricing strategies, and associated rate fences, can be evaluated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)707-726
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Travel Research
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

reactance
Fences
cultural difference
South Korea
pricing
revenue
Tourism
rate
book
Consumer culture
Willingness
manager
Managers
experimental study
tourism
management

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Transportation
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

@article{3c8c82f355d34fa3a85359bb83382160,
title = "A Tale of Two Cultures: Consumer Reactance and Willingness to Book Fenced Rates",
abstract = "Rate fences are integral to the practice of revenue management. Prior research suggests that cross-cultural differences in consumer reaction to rate fences exist but little is known about why this is so. This research employed two experimental studies with consumers from the United States and South Korea to explore the mechanisms underlying cultural differences in consumer reaction to nonphysical and physical rate fences. In Study 1, we found that feelings of reactance mediate the restriction-based nonphysical rate fence-willingness to book relationship for highly individualistic cultures, but not for highly collectivist cultures. Study 2’s findings suggest that consumers from low-context cultures favor product-based, over service-based, physical rate fences, while consumers from high-context cultures are unlikely to react differently to product-based, and service-based, physical rate fences. Together, the findings of Study 1 and Study 2 provide tourism managers a framework within which geolocation-based pricing strategies, and associated rate fences, can be evaluated.",
author = "Myungkeun Song and Breffni Noone and Mattila, {Anna S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0047287517713722",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "707--726",
journal = "Journal of Travel Research",
issn = "0047-2875",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

A Tale of Two Cultures : Consumer Reactance and Willingness to Book Fenced Rates. / Song, Myungkeun; Noone, Breffni; Mattila, Anna S.

In: Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 57, No. 6, 01.07.2018, p. 707-726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Tale of Two Cultures

T2 - Consumer Reactance and Willingness to Book Fenced Rates

AU - Song, Myungkeun

AU - Noone, Breffni

AU - Mattila, Anna S.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Rate fences are integral to the practice of revenue management. Prior research suggests that cross-cultural differences in consumer reaction to rate fences exist but little is known about why this is so. This research employed two experimental studies with consumers from the United States and South Korea to explore the mechanisms underlying cultural differences in consumer reaction to nonphysical and physical rate fences. In Study 1, we found that feelings of reactance mediate the restriction-based nonphysical rate fence-willingness to book relationship for highly individualistic cultures, but not for highly collectivist cultures. Study 2’s findings suggest that consumers from low-context cultures favor product-based, over service-based, physical rate fences, while consumers from high-context cultures are unlikely to react differently to product-based, and service-based, physical rate fences. Together, the findings of Study 1 and Study 2 provide tourism managers a framework within which geolocation-based pricing strategies, and associated rate fences, can be evaluated.

AB - Rate fences are integral to the practice of revenue management. Prior research suggests that cross-cultural differences in consumer reaction to rate fences exist but little is known about why this is so. This research employed two experimental studies with consumers from the United States and South Korea to explore the mechanisms underlying cultural differences in consumer reaction to nonphysical and physical rate fences. In Study 1, we found that feelings of reactance mediate the restriction-based nonphysical rate fence-willingness to book relationship for highly individualistic cultures, but not for highly collectivist cultures. Study 2’s findings suggest that consumers from low-context cultures favor product-based, over service-based, physical rate fences, while consumers from high-context cultures are unlikely to react differently to product-based, and service-based, physical rate fences. Together, the findings of Study 1 and Study 2 provide tourism managers a framework within which geolocation-based pricing strategies, and associated rate fences, can be evaluated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042940028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042940028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0047287517713722

DO - 10.1177/0047287517713722

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 707

EP - 726

JO - Journal of Travel Research

JF - Journal of Travel Research

SN - 0047-2875

IS - 6

ER -