Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior

Karen Page Winterich, Yinlong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Could power distance, which is the extent that inequality is expected and accepted, explain why some countries and consumers are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior, including donations of both money and time? This research proposes that higher power distance results in weaker perceptions of responsibility to aid others, which decreases charitable behavior. Both correlational and causal evidence is provided in a series of five studies that examine country-level power distance as well as individual and temporarily salient power distance belief. Consistent with the mediating role of perceived responsibility, results reveal that uncontrollable needs and communal relationship norms are boundary conditions that overcome the negative effect of power distance on charitable behavior. These results explain differences in charitable giving across cultures and provide implications for nonprofit organizations soliciting donations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-293
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

responsibility
donation
non-profit-organization
money
Power distance
Responsibility
evidence
Donation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{bde12676bb484dc58da4d64f85357f63,
title = "Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior",
abstract = "Could power distance, which is the extent that inequality is expected and accepted, explain why some countries and consumers are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior, including donations of both money and time? This research proposes that higher power distance results in weaker perceptions of responsibility to aid others, which decreases charitable behavior. Both correlational and causal evidence is provided in a series of five studies that examine country-level power distance as well as individual and temporarily salient power distance belief. Consistent with the mediating role of perceived responsibility, results reveal that uncontrollable needs and communal relationship norms are boundary conditions that overcome the negative effect of power distance on charitable behavior. These results explain differences in charitable giving across cultures and provide implications for nonprofit organizations soliciting donations.",
author = "Winterich, {Karen Page} and Yinlong Zhang",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1086/675927",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "274--293",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Research",
issn = "0093-5301",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "2",

}

Accepting inequality deters responsibility : How power distance decreases charitable behavior. / Winterich, Karen Page; Zhang, Yinlong.

In: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 08.2014, p. 274-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accepting inequality deters responsibility

T2 - How power distance decreases charitable behavior

AU - Winterich, Karen Page

AU - Zhang, Yinlong

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Could power distance, which is the extent that inequality is expected and accepted, explain why some countries and consumers are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior, including donations of both money and time? This research proposes that higher power distance results in weaker perceptions of responsibility to aid others, which decreases charitable behavior. Both correlational and causal evidence is provided in a series of five studies that examine country-level power distance as well as individual and temporarily salient power distance belief. Consistent with the mediating role of perceived responsibility, results reveal that uncontrollable needs and communal relationship norms are boundary conditions that overcome the negative effect of power distance on charitable behavior. These results explain differences in charitable giving across cultures and provide implications for nonprofit organizations soliciting donations.

AB - Could power distance, which is the extent that inequality is expected and accepted, explain why some countries and consumers are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior, including donations of both money and time? This research proposes that higher power distance results in weaker perceptions of responsibility to aid others, which decreases charitable behavior. Both correlational and causal evidence is provided in a series of five studies that examine country-level power distance as well as individual and temporarily salient power distance belief. Consistent with the mediating role of perceived responsibility, results reveal that uncontrollable needs and communal relationship norms are boundary conditions that overcome the negative effect of power distance on charitable behavior. These results explain differences in charitable giving across cultures and provide implications for nonprofit organizations soliciting donations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904201728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904201728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/675927

DO - 10.1086/675927

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904201728

VL - 41

SP - 274

EP - 293

JO - Journal of Consumer Research

JF - Journal of Consumer Research

SN - 0093-5301

IS - 2

ER -