Accountability Pressure, Academic Standards, and Educational Triage

Douglas Lee Lauen, Steven Michael Gaddis, Jr.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite common conceptions, evidence on whether No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has had adverse effects for low achieving students is mixed. We hypothesize that the incentive to shift attention away from the lowest achieving students increases with the rigor of state standards. Using panel data from students in North Carolina, we exploit two natural experiments: increases in the rigor of standards in math in 2006 and then again in reading in 2008. We report an increase in test score gaps between low and high achievers and students near grade level. Adverse effects on low achievers are largest in the lowest achieving schools. We discuss the policy implications of our findings given the widespread adoption of more rigorous Common Core Standards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-147
Number of pages21
JournalEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

responsibility
student
school grade
incentive
experiment
school
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Lauen, Douglas Lee ; Gaddis, Jr., Steven Michael. / Accountability Pressure, Academic Standards, and Educational Triage. In: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2016 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 127-147.
@article{8916125e23a44e92828a89d9908be112,
title = "Accountability Pressure, Academic Standards, and Educational Triage",
abstract = "Despite common conceptions, evidence on whether No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has had adverse effects for low achieving students is mixed. We hypothesize that the incentive to shift attention away from the lowest achieving students increases with the rigor of state standards. Using panel data from students in North Carolina, we exploit two natural experiments: increases in the rigor of standards in math in 2006 and then again in reading in 2008. We report an increase in test score gaps between low and high achievers and students near grade level. Adverse effects on low achievers are largest in the lowest achieving schools. We discuss the policy implications of our findings given the widespread adoption of more rigorous Common Core Standards.",
author = "Lauen, {Douglas Lee} and {Gaddis, Jr.}, {Steven Michael}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3102/0162373715598577",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "127--147",
journal = "Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis",
issn = "0162-3737",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Accountability Pressure, Academic Standards, and Educational Triage. / Lauen, Douglas Lee; Gaddis, Jr., Steven Michael.

In: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 127-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability Pressure, Academic Standards, and Educational Triage

AU - Lauen, Douglas Lee

AU - Gaddis, Jr., Steven Michael

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Despite common conceptions, evidence on whether No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has had adverse effects for low achieving students is mixed. We hypothesize that the incentive to shift attention away from the lowest achieving students increases with the rigor of state standards. Using panel data from students in North Carolina, we exploit two natural experiments: increases in the rigor of standards in math in 2006 and then again in reading in 2008. We report an increase in test score gaps between low and high achievers and students near grade level. Adverse effects on low achievers are largest in the lowest achieving schools. We discuss the policy implications of our findings given the widespread adoption of more rigorous Common Core Standards.

AB - Despite common conceptions, evidence on whether No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has had adverse effects for low achieving students is mixed. We hypothesize that the incentive to shift attention away from the lowest achieving students increases with the rigor of state standards. Using panel data from students in North Carolina, we exploit two natural experiments: increases in the rigor of standards in math in 2006 and then again in reading in 2008. We report an increase in test score gaps between low and high achievers and students near grade level. Adverse effects on low achievers are largest in the lowest achieving schools. We discuss the policy implications of our findings given the widespread adoption of more rigorous Common Core Standards.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957811807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957811807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/0162373715598577

DO - 10.3102/0162373715598577

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 127

EP - 147

JO - Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

JF - Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

SN - 0162-3737

IS - 1

ER -