Accuracy of the triple-deck theory for marginal separation

Chao Tsung Hsiao, Laura Pauley

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The steady two-dimensional marginal separation of an incompressible boundary layer flow within a channel was solved independently by three different methods: the triple-deck method of marginal separation, the interactive boundary layer method, and the full Navier-Stokes computations. From comparison of the results between these three methods, the accuracy and appropriateness of each method was determined. The critical condition beyond which the steady marginal separation solution of triple-deck method does not exist was related to a physical phenomenon in which the separation bubble becomes unsteady.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationSeparated Flows - 1993
    PublisherPubl by ASME
    Pages199
    Number of pages1
    Volume149
    ISBN (Print)0791809579
    StatePublished - 1993
    EventFluids Engineering Conference - Washington, DC, USA
    Duration: Jun 20 1993Jun 24 1993

    Other

    OtherFluids Engineering Conference
    CityWashington, DC, USA
    Period6/20/936/24/93

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Engineering(all)

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of the triple-deck theory for marginal separation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hsiao, C. T., & Pauley, L. (1993). Accuracy of the triple-deck theory for marginal separation. In Separated Flows - 1993 (Vol. 149, pp. 199). Publ by ASME.