ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Acute Nonlocalized Abdominal Pain

Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The range of pathology in adults that can produce abdominal pain is broad and necessitates an imaging approach to evaluate many different organ systems. Although localizing pain prompts directed imaging/management, clinical presentations may vary and result in nonlocalized symptoms. This review focuses on imaging the adult population with nonlocalized abdominal pain, including patients with fever, recent abdominal surgery, or neutropenia. Imaging of the entire abdomen and pelvis to evaluate for infectious or inflammatory processes of the abdominal viscera and solid organs, abdominal and pelvic neoplasms, and screen for ischemic or vascular etiologies is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Often the first-line modality, CT quickly evaluates the abdomen/pelvis, providing for accurate diagnoses and management of patients with abdominal pain. Ultrasound and tailored MRI protocols may be useful as first-line imaging studies, especially in pregnant patients. In the postoperative abdomen, fluoroscopy may help detect anastomotic leaks/abscesses. While often performed, abdominal radiographs may not alter management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S217-S231
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Abdomen
Abdominal Pain
Pelvis
Abdominal Neoplasms
Pelvic Neoplasms
Guidelines
Anastomotic Leak
Viscera
Fluoroscopy
Expert Testimony
Neutropenia
Radiology
Abscess
Blood Vessels
Fever
Therapeutics
Pathology
Pain
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:. / ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Acute Nonlocalized Abdominal Pain In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 11. pp. S217-S231.
@article{92e4be2eeefb41c183cfff89f9fcd1a5,
title = "ACR Appropriateness Criteria {\circledR} Acute Nonlocalized Abdominal Pain",
abstract = "The range of pathology in adults that can produce abdominal pain is broad and necessitates an imaging approach to evaluate many different organ systems. Although localizing pain prompts directed imaging/management, clinical presentations may vary and result in nonlocalized symptoms. This review focuses on imaging the adult population with nonlocalized abdominal pain, including patients with fever, recent abdominal surgery, or neutropenia. Imaging of the entire abdomen and pelvis to evaluate for infectious or inflammatory processes of the abdominal viscera and solid organs, abdominal and pelvic neoplasms, and screen for ischemic or vascular etiologies is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Often the first-line modality, CT quickly evaluates the abdomen/pelvis, providing for accurate diagnoses and management of patients with abdominal pain. Ultrasound and tailored MRI protocols may be useful as first-line imaging studies, especially in pregnant patients. In the postoperative abdomen, fluoroscopy may help detect anastomotic leaks/abscesses. While often performed, abdominal radiographs may not alter management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.",
author = "{Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:} and Scheirey, {Christopher D.} and Fowler, {Kathryn J.} and Therrien, {Jaclyn A.} and Kim, {David H.} and Al-Refaie, {Waddah B.} and Camacho, {Marc A.} and Cash, {Brooks D.} and Chang, {Kevin J.} and Garcia, {Evelyn M.} and Kambadakone, {Avinash R.} and Lambert, {Drew L.} and Levy, {Angela D.} and Daniele Marin and Courtney Moreno and Noto, {Richard B.} and Peterson, {Christine M.} and Smith, {Martin P.} and Stefanie Weinstein and Carucci, {Laura R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "S217--S231",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Acute Nonlocalized Abdominal Pain . / Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 11, 11.2018, p. S217-S231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Acute Nonlocalized Abdominal Pain

AU - Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging:

AU - Scheirey, Christopher D.

AU - Fowler, Kathryn J.

AU - Therrien, Jaclyn A.

AU - Kim, David H.

AU - Al-Refaie, Waddah B.

AU - Camacho, Marc A.

AU - Cash, Brooks D.

AU - Chang, Kevin J.

AU - Garcia, Evelyn M.

AU - Kambadakone, Avinash R.

AU - Lambert, Drew L.

AU - Levy, Angela D.

AU - Marin, Daniele

AU - Moreno, Courtney

AU - Noto, Richard B.

AU - Peterson, Christine M.

AU - Smith, Martin P.

AU - Weinstein, Stefanie

AU - Carucci, Laura R.

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - The range of pathology in adults that can produce abdominal pain is broad and necessitates an imaging approach to evaluate many different organ systems. Although localizing pain prompts directed imaging/management, clinical presentations may vary and result in nonlocalized symptoms. This review focuses on imaging the adult population with nonlocalized abdominal pain, including patients with fever, recent abdominal surgery, or neutropenia. Imaging of the entire abdomen and pelvis to evaluate for infectious or inflammatory processes of the abdominal viscera and solid organs, abdominal and pelvic neoplasms, and screen for ischemic or vascular etiologies is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Often the first-line modality, CT quickly evaluates the abdomen/pelvis, providing for accurate diagnoses and management of patients with abdominal pain. Ultrasound and tailored MRI protocols may be useful as first-line imaging studies, especially in pregnant patients. In the postoperative abdomen, fluoroscopy may help detect anastomotic leaks/abscesses. While often performed, abdominal radiographs may not alter management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

AB - The range of pathology in adults that can produce abdominal pain is broad and necessitates an imaging approach to evaluate many different organ systems. Although localizing pain prompts directed imaging/management, clinical presentations may vary and result in nonlocalized symptoms. This review focuses on imaging the adult population with nonlocalized abdominal pain, including patients with fever, recent abdominal surgery, or neutropenia. Imaging of the entire abdomen and pelvis to evaluate for infectious or inflammatory processes of the abdominal viscera and solid organs, abdominal and pelvic neoplasms, and screen for ischemic or vascular etiologies is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Often the first-line modality, CT quickly evaluates the abdomen/pelvis, providing for accurate diagnoses and management of patients with abdominal pain. Ultrasound and tailored MRI protocols may be useful as first-line imaging studies, especially in pregnant patients. In the postoperative abdomen, fluoroscopy may help detect anastomotic leaks/abscesses. While often performed, abdominal radiographs may not alter management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055451634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055451634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 30392591

AN - SCOPUS:85055451634

VL - 15

SP - S217-S231

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 11

ER -