Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Appraisal of Quality

Joslyn Sciacca Kirby, Thomas Scharnitz, Elizabeth Seiverling, Hadjh Ahrns, Sara Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous skin lesion and many AK management guidelines exist, but there has been limited investigation into the quality of these documents. The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and weaknesses of guidelines that address AK management. A systematic search for guidelines with recommendations for AK was performed. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) was used to appraise the quality of guidelines. Multiple raters independently reviewed each of the guidelines and applied the AGREE II tool and scores were calculated. Overall, 2,307 citations were identified and 7 fulfilled the study criteria. The Cancer Council of Australia/Australian Cancer Network guideline had the highest mean scores and was the only guideline to include a systematic review, include an evidence rating for recommendations, and report conflicts of interest and funding sources. High-quality, effective guidelines are evidence-based with recommendations that are concise and organized, so practical application is facilitated. Features such as concise tables, pictorial diagrams, and explicit links to evidence are helpful. However, the rigor and validity of some guidelines were weak. So, it is important for providers to be aware of the features that contribute to a high-quality, practical document.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number456071
JournalDermatology Research and Practice
Volume2015
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Actinic Keratosis
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology

Cite this

@article{7b25fea800e941688c7759708fd4204e,
title = "Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Appraisal of Quality",
abstract = "Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous skin lesion and many AK management guidelines exist, but there has been limited investigation into the quality of these documents. The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and weaknesses of guidelines that address AK management. A systematic search for guidelines with recommendations for AK was performed. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) was used to appraise the quality of guidelines. Multiple raters independently reviewed each of the guidelines and applied the AGREE II tool and scores were calculated. Overall, 2,307 citations were identified and 7 fulfilled the study criteria. The Cancer Council of Australia/Australian Cancer Network guideline had the highest mean scores and was the only guideline to include a systematic review, include an evidence rating for recommendations, and report conflicts of interest and funding sources. High-quality, effective guidelines are evidence-based with recommendations that are concise and organized, so practical application is facilitated. Features such as concise tables, pictorial diagrams, and explicit links to evidence are helpful. However, the rigor and validity of some guidelines were weak. So, it is important for providers to be aware of the features that contribute to a high-quality, practical document.",
author = "{Sciacca Kirby}, Joslyn and Thomas Scharnitz and Elizabeth Seiverling and Hadjh Ahrns and Sara Ferguson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2015/456071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2015",
journal = "Dermatology Research and Practice",
issn = "1687-6105",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines : An Appraisal of Quality. / Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn; Scharnitz, Thomas; Seiverling, Elizabeth; Ahrns, Hadjh; Ferguson, Sara.

In: Dermatology Research and Practice, Vol. 2015, 456071, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines

T2 - An Appraisal of Quality

AU - Sciacca Kirby, Joslyn

AU - Scharnitz, Thomas

AU - Seiverling, Elizabeth

AU - Ahrns, Hadjh

AU - Ferguson, Sara

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous skin lesion and many AK management guidelines exist, but there has been limited investigation into the quality of these documents. The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and weaknesses of guidelines that address AK management. A systematic search for guidelines with recommendations for AK was performed. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) was used to appraise the quality of guidelines. Multiple raters independently reviewed each of the guidelines and applied the AGREE II tool and scores were calculated. Overall, 2,307 citations were identified and 7 fulfilled the study criteria. The Cancer Council of Australia/Australian Cancer Network guideline had the highest mean scores and was the only guideline to include a systematic review, include an evidence rating for recommendations, and report conflicts of interest and funding sources. High-quality, effective guidelines are evidence-based with recommendations that are concise and organized, so practical application is facilitated. Features such as concise tables, pictorial diagrams, and explicit links to evidence are helpful. However, the rigor and validity of some guidelines were weak. So, it is important for providers to be aware of the features that contribute to a high-quality, practical document.

AB - Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous skin lesion and many AK management guidelines exist, but there has been limited investigation into the quality of these documents. The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and weaknesses of guidelines that address AK management. A systematic search for guidelines with recommendations for AK was performed. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) was used to appraise the quality of guidelines. Multiple raters independently reviewed each of the guidelines and applied the AGREE II tool and scores were calculated. Overall, 2,307 citations were identified and 7 fulfilled the study criteria. The Cancer Council of Australia/Australian Cancer Network guideline had the highest mean scores and was the only guideline to include a systematic review, include an evidence rating for recommendations, and report conflicts of interest and funding sources. High-quality, effective guidelines are evidence-based with recommendations that are concise and organized, so practical application is facilitated. Features such as concise tables, pictorial diagrams, and explicit links to evidence are helpful. However, the rigor and validity of some guidelines were weak. So, it is important for providers to be aware of the features that contribute to a high-quality, practical document.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942904875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942904875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2015/456071

DO - 10.1155/2015/456071

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26451140

AN - SCOPUS:84942904875

VL - 2015

JO - Dermatology Research and Practice

JF - Dermatology Research and Practice

SN - 1687-6105

M1 - 456071

ER -