TY - JOUR
T1 - Adaptive sampling in research on risk-related behaviors
AU - Thompson, Steven K.
AU - Collins, Linda M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse grants R01 DA09872 and P50 10075, and the National Science Foundation grant DMS-9626102. Preparation of this review has also been supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Research Network on the Etiology of Tobacco Dependence.
PY - 2002/11/1
Y1 - 2002/11/1
N2 - This article introduces adaptive sampling designs to substance use researchers. Adaptive sampling is particularly useful when the population of interest is rare, unevenly distributed, hidden, or hard to reach. Examples of such populations are injection drug users, individuals at high risk for HIV/AIDS, and young adolescents who are nicotine dependent. In conventional sampling, the sampling design is based entirely on a priori information, and is fixed before the study begins. By contrast, in adaptive sampling, the sampling design adapts based on observations made during the survey; for example, drug users may be asked to refer other drug users to the researcher. In the present article several adaptive sampling designs are discussed. Link-tracing designs such as snowball sampling, random walk methods, and network sampling are described, along with adaptive allocation and adaptive cluster sampling. It is stressed that special estimation procedures taking the sampling design into account are needed when adaptive sampling has been used. These procedures yield estimates that are considerably better than conventional estimates. For rare and clustered populations adaptive designs can give substantial gains in efficiency over conventional designs, and for hidden populations link-tracing and other adaptive procedures may provide the only practical way to obtain a sample large enough for the study objectives.
AB - This article introduces adaptive sampling designs to substance use researchers. Adaptive sampling is particularly useful when the population of interest is rare, unevenly distributed, hidden, or hard to reach. Examples of such populations are injection drug users, individuals at high risk for HIV/AIDS, and young adolescents who are nicotine dependent. In conventional sampling, the sampling design is based entirely on a priori information, and is fixed before the study begins. By contrast, in adaptive sampling, the sampling design adapts based on observations made during the survey; for example, drug users may be asked to refer other drug users to the researcher. In the present article several adaptive sampling designs are discussed. Link-tracing designs such as snowball sampling, random walk methods, and network sampling are described, along with adaptive allocation and adaptive cluster sampling. It is stressed that special estimation procedures taking the sampling design into account are needed when adaptive sampling has been used. These procedures yield estimates that are considerably better than conventional estimates. For rare and clustered populations adaptive designs can give substantial gains in efficiency over conventional designs, and for hidden populations link-tracing and other adaptive procedures may provide the only practical way to obtain a sample large enough for the study objectives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036830263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036830263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00215-6
DO - 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00215-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 12324175
AN - SCOPUS:0036830263
SN - 0376-8716
VL - 68
SP - 57
EP - 67
JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence
JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence
IS - SUPPL.
ER -