Additional correction to the impulse invariance method for the design of IIR digital filters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Almost four decades after the impulse invariance (i.i.) method has been in vogue, a correct way of its application has been emphasized independently, but at the same time, by Jackson and Mecklenbräuker. When there is a discontinuity at t = 0 in the analog impulse response, the correct way requires that one should take half of its value. In spite of this correction, due to under-sampling there persists aliasing error in the frequency domain. In this paper the effect of aliasing is viewed as a 3 dB frequency warping and a pre-warping step prior to its application is proposed to reduce it, thereby making the technique appropriate from the viewpoint of frequency domain also. Simulation examples comparing this approach with the traditional method reveal significant improvement in the frequency response. Further, according to Jackson and Mecklenbräuker and also as written in many a standard textbook available today, i.i. technique cannot be used when the degrees of the numerator and denominator polynomials of the parent analog transfer function are equal. An example under this category is the Pre-emphasis circuit or a simple high pass filter. We shall show how the technique can still be used even for a Pre-emphasis circuit. Antoniou proposed (an intelligently) modified impulse invariance technique for certain types of filters by which, aliasing error is nearly eliminated. These cases are neither admitted by the traditional i.i. method nor by that of Jackson and Mecklenbräuker at all. Antoniou's modified method results in a digital filter of order almost twice as great with an additional task of stabilization. The method in this paper retains the stability and order but gives satisfactory response. In the standard textbooks, the i.i. technique is explained with the help of a first-order low-pass filter and for higher orders, partial fraction expansion is used. For the situation of repeated poles, application of i.i. method calls for extreme care and special handling. This paper alternatively employs the use of state variables to make i.i. technique more elegant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)530-540
Number of pages11
JournalDigital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

IIR filters
Digital filters
Invariance
Textbooks
High pass filters
Networks (circuits)
Low pass filters
Impulse response
Frequency response
Transfer functions
Poles
Stabilization
Polynomials
Sampling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Signal Processing
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{9f5aaa6684f64747b75298052917fa68,
title = "Additional correction to the impulse invariance method for the design of IIR digital filters",
abstract = "Almost four decades after the impulse invariance (i.i.) method has been in vogue, a correct way of its application has been emphasized independently, but at the same time, by Jackson and Mecklenbr{\"a}uker. When there is a discontinuity at t = 0 in the analog impulse response, the correct way requires that one should take half of its value. In spite of this correction, due to under-sampling there persists aliasing error in the frequency domain. In this paper the effect of aliasing is viewed as a 3 dB frequency warping and a pre-warping step prior to its application is proposed to reduce it, thereby making the technique appropriate from the viewpoint of frequency domain also. Simulation examples comparing this approach with the traditional method reveal significant improvement in the frequency response. Further, according to Jackson and Mecklenbr{\"a}uker and also as written in many a standard textbook available today, i.i. technique cannot be used when the degrees of the numerator and denominator polynomials of the parent analog transfer function are equal. An example under this category is the Pre-emphasis circuit or a simple high pass filter. We shall show how the technique can still be used even for a Pre-emphasis circuit. Antoniou proposed (an intelligently) modified impulse invariance technique for certain types of filters by which, aliasing error is nearly eliminated. These cases are neither admitted by the traditional i.i. method nor by that of Jackson and Mecklenbr{\"a}uker at all. Antoniou's modified method results in a digital filter of order almost twice as great with an additional task of stabilization. The method in this paper retains the stability and order but gives satisfactory response. In the standard textbooks, the i.i. technique is explained with the help of a first-order low-pass filter and for higher orders, partial fraction expansion is used. For the situation of repeated poles, application of i.i. method calls for extreme care and special handling. This paper alternatively employs the use of state variables to make i.i. technique more elegant.",
author = "Nelatury, {Sudarshan Rao}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dsp.2006.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "530--540",
journal = "Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal",
issn = "1051-2004",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additional correction to the impulse invariance method for the design of IIR digital filters

AU - Nelatury, Sudarshan Rao

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Almost four decades after the impulse invariance (i.i.) method has been in vogue, a correct way of its application has been emphasized independently, but at the same time, by Jackson and Mecklenbräuker. When there is a discontinuity at t = 0 in the analog impulse response, the correct way requires that one should take half of its value. In spite of this correction, due to under-sampling there persists aliasing error in the frequency domain. In this paper the effect of aliasing is viewed as a 3 dB frequency warping and a pre-warping step prior to its application is proposed to reduce it, thereby making the technique appropriate from the viewpoint of frequency domain also. Simulation examples comparing this approach with the traditional method reveal significant improvement in the frequency response. Further, according to Jackson and Mecklenbräuker and also as written in many a standard textbook available today, i.i. technique cannot be used when the degrees of the numerator and denominator polynomials of the parent analog transfer function are equal. An example under this category is the Pre-emphasis circuit or a simple high pass filter. We shall show how the technique can still be used even for a Pre-emphasis circuit. Antoniou proposed (an intelligently) modified impulse invariance technique for certain types of filters by which, aliasing error is nearly eliminated. These cases are neither admitted by the traditional i.i. method nor by that of Jackson and Mecklenbräuker at all. Antoniou's modified method results in a digital filter of order almost twice as great with an additional task of stabilization. The method in this paper retains the stability and order but gives satisfactory response. In the standard textbooks, the i.i. technique is explained with the help of a first-order low-pass filter and for higher orders, partial fraction expansion is used. For the situation of repeated poles, application of i.i. method calls for extreme care and special handling. This paper alternatively employs the use of state variables to make i.i. technique more elegant.

AB - Almost four decades after the impulse invariance (i.i.) method has been in vogue, a correct way of its application has been emphasized independently, but at the same time, by Jackson and Mecklenbräuker. When there is a discontinuity at t = 0 in the analog impulse response, the correct way requires that one should take half of its value. In spite of this correction, due to under-sampling there persists aliasing error in the frequency domain. In this paper the effect of aliasing is viewed as a 3 dB frequency warping and a pre-warping step prior to its application is proposed to reduce it, thereby making the technique appropriate from the viewpoint of frequency domain also. Simulation examples comparing this approach with the traditional method reveal significant improvement in the frequency response. Further, according to Jackson and Mecklenbräuker and also as written in many a standard textbook available today, i.i. technique cannot be used when the degrees of the numerator and denominator polynomials of the parent analog transfer function are equal. An example under this category is the Pre-emphasis circuit or a simple high pass filter. We shall show how the technique can still be used even for a Pre-emphasis circuit. Antoniou proposed (an intelligently) modified impulse invariance technique for certain types of filters by which, aliasing error is nearly eliminated. These cases are neither admitted by the traditional i.i. method nor by that of Jackson and Mecklenbräuker at all. Antoniou's modified method results in a digital filter of order almost twice as great with an additional task of stabilization. The method in this paper retains the stability and order but gives satisfactory response. In the standard textbooks, the i.i. technique is explained with the help of a first-order low-pass filter and for higher orders, partial fraction expansion is used. For the situation of repeated poles, application of i.i. method calls for extreme care and special handling. This paper alternatively employs the use of state variables to make i.i. technique more elegant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846632309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846632309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dsp.2006.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.dsp.2006.10.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33846632309

VL - 17

SP - 530

EP - 540

JO - Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal

JF - Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal

SN - 1051-2004

IS - 2

ER -