Additive genetic variation in the craniofacial skeleton of baboons (genus Papio) and its relationship to body and cranial size

Jessica L. Joganic, Katherine E. Willmore, Joan T. Richtsmeier, Kenneth M. Weiss, Michael C. Mahaney, Jeffrey Rogers, James M. Cheverud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Determining the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and genetic correlations among them is important for understanding morphological evolution patterns. We address two questions regarding papionin evolution: (1) what effect do body and cranial size, age, and sex have on phenotypic (V P ) and additive genetic (V A ) variation in baboon crania, and (2) how might additive genetic correlations between craniofacial traits and body mass affect morphological evolution?. Materials and Methods: We use a large captive pedigreed baboon sample to estimate quantitative genetic parameters for craniofacial dimensions (EIDs). Our models include nested combinations of the covariates listed above. We also simulate the correlated response of a given EID due to selection on body mass alone. Results: Covariates account for 1.2–91% of craniofacial V P . EID V A decreases across models as more covariates are included. The median genetic correlation estimate between each EID and body mass is 0.33. Analysis of the multivariate response to selection reveals that observed patterns of craniofacial variation in extant baboons cannot be attributed solely to correlated response to selection on body mass, particularly in males. Discussion: Because a relatively large proportion of EID V A is shared with body mass variation, different methods of correcting for allometry by statistically controlling for size can alter residual V P patterns. This may conflate direct selection effects on craniofacial variation with those resulting from a correlated response to body mass selection. This shared genetic variation may partially explain how selection for increased body mass in two different papionin lineages produced remarkably similar craniofacial phenotypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-285
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume165
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Papio
Body Size
Skeleton
Skull
Multivariate Analysis
Phenotype

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anatomy
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Joganic, Jessica L. ; Willmore, Katherine E. ; Richtsmeier, Joan T. ; Weiss, Kenneth M. ; Mahaney, Michael C. ; Rogers, Jeffrey ; Cheverud, James M. / Additive genetic variation in the craniofacial skeleton of baboons (genus Papio) and its relationship to body and cranial size. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2018 ; Vol. 165, No. 2. pp. 269-285.
@article{52d01bc778074a7fa8c973f18c74096b,
title = "Additive genetic variation in the craniofacial skeleton of baboons (genus Papio) and its relationship to body and cranial size",
abstract = "Objectives: Determining the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and genetic correlations among them is important for understanding morphological evolution patterns. We address two questions regarding papionin evolution: (1) what effect do body and cranial size, age, and sex have on phenotypic (V P ) and additive genetic (V A ) variation in baboon crania, and (2) how might additive genetic correlations between craniofacial traits and body mass affect morphological evolution?. Materials and Methods: We use a large captive pedigreed baboon sample to estimate quantitative genetic parameters for craniofacial dimensions (EIDs). Our models include nested combinations of the covariates listed above. We also simulate the correlated response of a given EID due to selection on body mass alone. Results: Covariates account for 1.2–91{\%} of craniofacial V P . EID V A decreases across models as more covariates are included. The median genetic correlation estimate between each EID and body mass is 0.33. Analysis of the multivariate response to selection reveals that observed patterns of craniofacial variation in extant baboons cannot be attributed solely to correlated response to selection on body mass, particularly in males. Discussion: Because a relatively large proportion of EID V A is shared with body mass variation, different methods of correcting for allometry by statistically controlling for size can alter residual V P patterns. This may conflate direct selection effects on craniofacial variation with those resulting from a correlated response to body mass selection. This shared genetic variation may partially explain how selection for increased body mass in two different papionin lineages produced remarkably similar craniofacial phenotypes.",
author = "Joganic, {Jessica L.} and Willmore, {Katherine E.} and Richtsmeier, {Joan T.} and Weiss, {Kenneth M.} and Mahaney, {Michael C.} and Jeffrey Rogers and Cheverud, {James M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.23349",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "165",
pages = "269--285",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Additive genetic variation in the craniofacial skeleton of baboons (genus Papio) and its relationship to body and cranial size. / Joganic, Jessica L.; Willmore, Katherine E.; Richtsmeier, Joan T.; Weiss, Kenneth M.; Mahaney, Michael C.; Rogers, Jeffrey; Cheverud, James M.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 165, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 269-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additive genetic variation in the craniofacial skeleton of baboons (genus Papio) and its relationship to body and cranial size

AU - Joganic, Jessica L.

AU - Willmore, Katherine E.

AU - Richtsmeier, Joan T.

AU - Weiss, Kenneth M.

AU - Mahaney, Michael C.

AU - Rogers, Jeffrey

AU - Cheverud, James M.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Objectives: Determining the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and genetic correlations among them is important for understanding morphological evolution patterns. We address two questions regarding papionin evolution: (1) what effect do body and cranial size, age, and sex have on phenotypic (V P ) and additive genetic (V A ) variation in baboon crania, and (2) how might additive genetic correlations between craniofacial traits and body mass affect morphological evolution?. Materials and Methods: We use a large captive pedigreed baboon sample to estimate quantitative genetic parameters for craniofacial dimensions (EIDs). Our models include nested combinations of the covariates listed above. We also simulate the correlated response of a given EID due to selection on body mass alone. Results: Covariates account for 1.2–91% of craniofacial V P . EID V A decreases across models as more covariates are included. The median genetic correlation estimate between each EID and body mass is 0.33. Analysis of the multivariate response to selection reveals that observed patterns of craniofacial variation in extant baboons cannot be attributed solely to correlated response to selection on body mass, particularly in males. Discussion: Because a relatively large proportion of EID V A is shared with body mass variation, different methods of correcting for allometry by statistically controlling for size can alter residual V P patterns. This may conflate direct selection effects on craniofacial variation with those resulting from a correlated response to body mass selection. This shared genetic variation may partially explain how selection for increased body mass in two different papionin lineages produced remarkably similar craniofacial phenotypes.

AB - Objectives: Determining the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and genetic correlations among them is important for understanding morphological evolution patterns. We address two questions regarding papionin evolution: (1) what effect do body and cranial size, age, and sex have on phenotypic (V P ) and additive genetic (V A ) variation in baboon crania, and (2) how might additive genetic correlations between craniofacial traits and body mass affect morphological evolution?. Materials and Methods: We use a large captive pedigreed baboon sample to estimate quantitative genetic parameters for craniofacial dimensions (EIDs). Our models include nested combinations of the covariates listed above. We also simulate the correlated response of a given EID due to selection on body mass alone. Results: Covariates account for 1.2–91% of craniofacial V P . EID V A decreases across models as more covariates are included. The median genetic correlation estimate between each EID and body mass is 0.33. Analysis of the multivariate response to selection reveals that observed patterns of craniofacial variation in extant baboons cannot be attributed solely to correlated response to selection on body mass, particularly in males. Discussion: Because a relatively large proportion of EID V A is shared with body mass variation, different methods of correcting for allometry by statistically controlling for size can alter residual V P patterns. This may conflate direct selection effects on craniofacial variation with those resulting from a correlated response to body mass selection. This shared genetic variation may partially explain how selection for increased body mass in two different papionin lineages produced remarkably similar craniofacial phenotypes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034638342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034638342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.23349

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.23349

M3 - Article

C2 - 29154459

AN - SCOPUS:85034638342

VL - 165

SP - 269

EP - 285

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 2

ER -