Additive manufacturing-integrated hybrid manufacturing and subtractive processes

Economic model and analysis

Guhaprasanna Manogharan, Richard A. Wysk, Ola L.A. Harrysson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents economic models for a new hybrid method where additive manufacturing (AM) and subtractive methods (SMs) are integrated through composite process planning. Although AM and SM offer several unique advantages, there are technological limitations such as tolerance and surface finish requirements; tooling and fixturing, etc. that cannot be met by a single type of manufacturing. The intent of this article is not to show a new manufacturing method, but rather to provide economic context to additive and subtractive methods as the best practice provides, and look at the corresponding economics of each of those methods as a function of production batch size, machinability, cost of the material, part geometry and tolerance requirements. Basic models of fixed and variable costs associated with additive, subtractive and hybrid methods to produce parts are also presented. An experimental design is used to study the influence of production volume, material and operating cost, batch size, machinability of the material and impact of reducing AM processing time. A composite response model for the unit cost is computed for the various levels associated with such engineering requirements. The developed models provide insight into how these variables affect the costs associated with engineering a mechanical product that will be produced using AM and SM methods. From the results, it appears that batch size, AM processing time and AM processing cost were the major cost factors. It was shown that the cost of producing near-net shape through SM and AM was the decision criteria; which will be critical for tough-to-machine alloys and at multi-batch size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)473-488
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 2016

Fingerprint

3D printers
Economics
Costs
Machinability
Processing
Requirements engineering
Composite materials
Process planning
Operating costs
Design of experiments
Geometry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{ac2f986b6788475494d4d754aa2eea5e,
title = "Additive manufacturing-integrated hybrid manufacturing and subtractive processes: Economic model and analysis",
abstract = "This article presents economic models for a new hybrid method where additive manufacturing (AM) and subtractive methods (SMs) are integrated through composite process planning. Although AM and SM offer several unique advantages, there are technological limitations such as tolerance and surface finish requirements; tooling and fixturing, etc. that cannot be met by a single type of manufacturing. The intent of this article is not to show a new manufacturing method, but rather to provide economic context to additive and subtractive methods as the best practice provides, and look at the corresponding economics of each of those methods as a function of production batch size, machinability, cost of the material, part geometry and tolerance requirements. Basic models of fixed and variable costs associated with additive, subtractive and hybrid methods to produce parts are also presented. An experimental design is used to study the influence of production volume, material and operating cost, batch size, machinability of the material and impact of reducing AM processing time. A composite response model for the unit cost is computed for the various levels associated with such engineering requirements. The developed models provide insight into how these variables affect the costs associated with engineering a mechanical product that will be produced using AM and SM methods. From the results, it appears that batch size, AM processing time and AM processing cost were the major cost factors. It was shown that the cost of producing near-net shape through SM and AM was the decision criteria; which will be critical for tough-to-machine alloys and at multi-batch size.",
author = "Guhaprasanna Manogharan and Wysk, {Richard A.} and Harrysson, {Ola L.A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/0951192X.2015.1067920",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "473--488",
journal = "International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing",
issn = "0951-192X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Additive manufacturing-integrated hybrid manufacturing and subtractive processes : Economic model and analysis. / Manogharan, Guhaprasanna; Wysk, Richard A.; Harrysson, Ola L.A.

In: International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 29, No. 5, 03.05.2016, p. 473-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additive manufacturing-integrated hybrid manufacturing and subtractive processes

T2 - Economic model and analysis

AU - Manogharan, Guhaprasanna

AU - Wysk, Richard A.

AU - Harrysson, Ola L.A.

PY - 2016/5/3

Y1 - 2016/5/3

N2 - This article presents economic models for a new hybrid method where additive manufacturing (AM) and subtractive methods (SMs) are integrated through composite process planning. Although AM and SM offer several unique advantages, there are technological limitations such as tolerance and surface finish requirements; tooling and fixturing, etc. that cannot be met by a single type of manufacturing. The intent of this article is not to show a new manufacturing method, but rather to provide economic context to additive and subtractive methods as the best practice provides, and look at the corresponding economics of each of those methods as a function of production batch size, machinability, cost of the material, part geometry and tolerance requirements. Basic models of fixed and variable costs associated with additive, subtractive and hybrid methods to produce parts are also presented. An experimental design is used to study the influence of production volume, material and operating cost, batch size, machinability of the material and impact of reducing AM processing time. A composite response model for the unit cost is computed for the various levels associated with such engineering requirements. The developed models provide insight into how these variables affect the costs associated with engineering a mechanical product that will be produced using AM and SM methods. From the results, it appears that batch size, AM processing time and AM processing cost were the major cost factors. It was shown that the cost of producing near-net shape through SM and AM was the decision criteria; which will be critical for tough-to-machine alloys and at multi-batch size.

AB - This article presents economic models for a new hybrid method where additive manufacturing (AM) and subtractive methods (SMs) are integrated through composite process planning. Although AM and SM offer several unique advantages, there are technological limitations such as tolerance and surface finish requirements; tooling and fixturing, etc. that cannot be met by a single type of manufacturing. The intent of this article is not to show a new manufacturing method, but rather to provide economic context to additive and subtractive methods as the best practice provides, and look at the corresponding economics of each of those methods as a function of production batch size, machinability, cost of the material, part geometry and tolerance requirements. Basic models of fixed and variable costs associated with additive, subtractive and hybrid methods to produce parts are also presented. An experimental design is used to study the influence of production volume, material and operating cost, batch size, machinability of the material and impact of reducing AM processing time. A composite response model for the unit cost is computed for the various levels associated with such engineering requirements. The developed models provide insight into how these variables affect the costs associated with engineering a mechanical product that will be produced using AM and SM methods. From the results, it appears that batch size, AM processing time and AM processing cost were the major cost factors. It was shown that the cost of producing near-net shape through SM and AM was the decision criteria; which will be critical for tough-to-machine alloys and at multi-batch size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960249693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960249693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0951192X.2015.1067920

DO - 10.1080/0951192X.2015.1067920

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 473

EP - 488

JO - International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

JF - International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

SN - 0951-192X

IS - 5

ER -