Adoption of population-level statistical methods did transform psychological science but for the better: Commentary on Lamiell (2018)

Robert W. Proctor, Aiping Xiong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Lamiell presents a case that differential psychology (the study of individual differences) and experimental psychology should properly be classified as a form of demography (psychodemography) rather than psychology. He indicates that individual differences pertain to correlations in a population and maintains that mainstream psychology misinterprets such correlations as attributes of individuals. Lamiell also claims that because experimental psychology uses group designs, it too is demography, and he recommends that experimental psychology return to "genuinely appropriate" methods of deriving general laws from the study of individuals. We disagree with Lamiell's assessment and classifications, and we emphasize that group experiments have yielded considerable knowledge about the nature of information processing in individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-487
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychology
Volume131
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Experimental Psychology
Psychology
Individuality
Demography
Population
Automatic Data Processing
Statistical Methods
Psychological
Individual Differences

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{79fd64cb848e48ebbe3569db83b95fd0,
title = "Adoption of population-level statistical methods did transform psychological science but for the better: Commentary on Lamiell (2018)",
abstract = "Lamiell presents a case that differential psychology (the study of individual differences) and experimental psychology should properly be classified as a form of demography (psychodemography) rather than psychology. He indicates that individual differences pertain to correlations in a population and maintains that mainstream psychology misinterprets such correlations as attributes of individuals. Lamiell also claims that because experimental psychology uses group designs, it too is demography, and he recommends that experimental psychology return to {"}genuinely appropriate{"} methods of deriving general laws from the study of individuals. We disagree with Lamiell's assessment and classifications, and we emphasize that group experiments have yielded considerable knowledge about the nature of information processing in individuals.",
author = "Proctor, {Robert W.} and Aiping Xiong",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.4.0483",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "483--487",
journal = "American Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0002-9556",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "4",

}

Adoption of population-level statistical methods did transform psychological science but for the better : Commentary on Lamiell (2018). / Proctor, Robert W.; Xiong, Aiping.

In: American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 131, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 483-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of population-level statistical methods did transform psychological science but for the better

T2 - Commentary on Lamiell (2018)

AU - Proctor, Robert W.

AU - Xiong, Aiping

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Lamiell presents a case that differential psychology (the study of individual differences) and experimental psychology should properly be classified as a form of demography (psychodemography) rather than psychology. He indicates that individual differences pertain to correlations in a population and maintains that mainstream psychology misinterprets such correlations as attributes of individuals. Lamiell also claims that because experimental psychology uses group designs, it too is demography, and he recommends that experimental psychology return to "genuinely appropriate" methods of deriving general laws from the study of individuals. We disagree with Lamiell's assessment and classifications, and we emphasize that group experiments have yielded considerable knowledge about the nature of information processing in individuals.

AB - Lamiell presents a case that differential psychology (the study of individual differences) and experimental psychology should properly be classified as a form of demography (psychodemography) rather than psychology. He indicates that individual differences pertain to correlations in a population and maintains that mainstream psychology misinterprets such correlations as attributes of individuals. Lamiell also claims that because experimental psychology uses group designs, it too is demography, and he recommends that experimental psychology return to "genuinely appropriate" methods of deriving general laws from the study of individuals. We disagree with Lamiell's assessment and classifications, and we emphasize that group experiments have yielded considerable knowledge about the nature of information processing in individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057881642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057881642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.4.0483

DO - 10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.4.0483

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057881642

VL - 131

SP - 483

EP - 487

JO - American Journal of Psychology

JF - American Journal of Psychology

SN - 0002-9556

IS - 4

ER -