Adult emergency department referrals from urgent care centers

Isaac Siegfried, Jennifer Jacobs, Robert Olympia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Although urgent care centers (UCCs) can often evaluate and treat minor injuries/illnesses, patients may present with life threatening conditions that require immediate recognition, stabilization, and transfer to a higher level of care, beyond the capabilities of most UCCs. Objective: To describe adult ED referrals from UCCs and to determine the percentage of referrals considered critical, complex, and simple. Methods: A prospective study was conducted between 8/2016–8/2017 on patients >18 years referred directly to our ED from surrounding UCCs. Referrals were categorized based on investigations/procedures performed or medications/consultations received in the ED. Results: We analyzed 317 patient encounters; 23 (7.3%) considered critical, 254 (80.1%) complex, and 40 (12.6%) simple. The most common chief complaints for all ED referrals were abdominal pain (62 encounters), chest pain (28), shortness of breath (16), eye pain/injury (16), and leg pain/swelling (15). 68% of patients received laboratory diagnostic investigations and 69% received radiologic investigations. 37% of patients required consultation from a subspecialist. 78% of patients were discharged home. The most common primary diagnoses for all ED referrals were nonspecific abdominal pain (27 encounters), laceration (22), fracture (20), nonspecific chest pain (12), cellulitis (12), and pneumonia (12). The most common primary diagnoses for critical referrals were appendicitis (7) and fracture (3). Conclusion: Many adult ED referrals in our sample were considered complex and few were considered critical. Individual UCCs should evaluate their current states of ED referrals, and develop educational and preparedness strategies based on the epidemiology of adult emergencies that may occur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Care Facilities
Hospital Emergency Service
Referral and Consultation
Chest Pain
Abdominal Pain
Eye Pain
Eye Injuries
Cellulitis
Lacerations
Appendicitis
Dyspnea
Leg
Pneumonia
Epidemiology
Emergencies
Prospective Studies
Pain
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

@article{7ce03413ef9b48d185b29e18c7a31a76,
title = "Adult emergency department referrals from urgent care centers",
abstract = "Background: Although urgent care centers (UCCs) can often evaluate and treat minor injuries/illnesses, patients may present with life threatening conditions that require immediate recognition, stabilization, and transfer to a higher level of care, beyond the capabilities of most UCCs. Objective: To describe adult ED referrals from UCCs and to determine the percentage of referrals considered critical, complex, and simple. Methods: A prospective study was conducted between 8/2016–8/2017 on patients >18 years referred directly to our ED from surrounding UCCs. Referrals were categorized based on investigations/procedures performed or medications/consultations received in the ED. Results: We analyzed 317 patient encounters; 23 (7.3{\%}) considered critical, 254 (80.1{\%}) complex, and 40 (12.6{\%}) simple. The most common chief complaints for all ED referrals were abdominal pain (62 encounters), chest pain (28), shortness of breath (16), eye pain/injury (16), and leg pain/swelling (15). 68{\%} of patients received laboratory diagnostic investigations and 69{\%} received radiologic investigations. 37{\%} of patients required consultation from a subspecialist. 78{\%} of patients were discharged home. The most common primary diagnoses for all ED referrals were nonspecific abdominal pain (27 encounters), laceration (22), fracture (20), nonspecific chest pain (12), cellulitis (12), and pneumonia (12). The most common primary diagnoses for critical referrals were appendicitis (7) and fracture (3). Conclusion: Many adult ED referrals in our sample were considered complex and few were considered critical. Individual UCCs should evaluate their current states of ED referrals, and develop educational and preparedness strategies based on the epidemiology of adult emergencies that may occur.",
author = "Isaac Siegfried and Jennifer Jacobs and Robert Olympia",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.029",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

Adult emergency department referrals from urgent care centers. / Siegfried, Isaac; Jacobs, Jennifer; Olympia, Robert.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adult emergency department referrals from urgent care centers

AU - Siegfried, Isaac

AU - Jacobs, Jennifer

AU - Olympia, Robert

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Although urgent care centers (UCCs) can often evaluate and treat minor injuries/illnesses, patients may present with life threatening conditions that require immediate recognition, stabilization, and transfer to a higher level of care, beyond the capabilities of most UCCs. Objective: To describe adult ED referrals from UCCs and to determine the percentage of referrals considered critical, complex, and simple. Methods: A prospective study was conducted between 8/2016–8/2017 on patients >18 years referred directly to our ED from surrounding UCCs. Referrals were categorized based on investigations/procedures performed or medications/consultations received in the ED. Results: We analyzed 317 patient encounters; 23 (7.3%) considered critical, 254 (80.1%) complex, and 40 (12.6%) simple. The most common chief complaints for all ED referrals were abdominal pain (62 encounters), chest pain (28), shortness of breath (16), eye pain/injury (16), and leg pain/swelling (15). 68% of patients received laboratory diagnostic investigations and 69% received radiologic investigations. 37% of patients required consultation from a subspecialist. 78% of patients were discharged home. The most common primary diagnoses for all ED referrals were nonspecific abdominal pain (27 encounters), laceration (22), fracture (20), nonspecific chest pain (12), cellulitis (12), and pneumonia (12). The most common primary diagnoses for critical referrals were appendicitis (7) and fracture (3). Conclusion: Many adult ED referrals in our sample were considered complex and few were considered critical. Individual UCCs should evaluate their current states of ED referrals, and develop educational and preparedness strategies based on the epidemiology of adult emergencies that may occur.

AB - Background: Although urgent care centers (UCCs) can often evaluate and treat minor injuries/illnesses, patients may present with life threatening conditions that require immediate recognition, stabilization, and transfer to a higher level of care, beyond the capabilities of most UCCs. Objective: To describe adult ED referrals from UCCs and to determine the percentage of referrals considered critical, complex, and simple. Methods: A prospective study was conducted between 8/2016–8/2017 on patients >18 years referred directly to our ED from surrounding UCCs. Referrals were categorized based on investigations/procedures performed or medications/consultations received in the ED. Results: We analyzed 317 patient encounters; 23 (7.3%) considered critical, 254 (80.1%) complex, and 40 (12.6%) simple. The most common chief complaints for all ED referrals were abdominal pain (62 encounters), chest pain (28), shortness of breath (16), eye pain/injury (16), and leg pain/swelling (15). 68% of patients received laboratory diagnostic investigations and 69% received radiologic investigations. 37% of patients required consultation from a subspecialist. 78% of patients were discharged home. The most common primary diagnoses for all ED referrals were nonspecific abdominal pain (27 encounters), laceration (22), fracture (20), nonspecific chest pain (12), cellulitis (12), and pneumonia (12). The most common primary diagnoses for critical referrals were appendicitis (7) and fracture (3). Conclusion: Many adult ED referrals in our sample were considered complex and few were considered critical. Individual UCCs should evaluate their current states of ED referrals, and develop educational and preparedness strategies based on the epidemiology of adult emergencies that may occur.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060233180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060233180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 30683470

AN - SCOPUS:85060233180

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

ER -