Advice for early-career peer reviewers and authors responding to peer reviews

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The peer-review system, despite its flaws, is a central component of the publication process. However, relatively little guidance is provided for early-career scientists on 2 important aspects of peer review: 1) writing effective peer reviews and 2) responding effectively to reviews of a manuscript. In this editorial, I discuss the peer review process briefly and provide the rationale and context for the 2 editorials that follow it. This series of editorials is a first step toward encouraging and mentoring students and early career scientists as they become engaged professionals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1073-1075
Number of pages3
JournalFreshwater Science
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Aquatic Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Advice for early-career peer reviewers and authors responding to peer reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this