Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment

Jacob A. Benfield, Paul A. Bell, Lucy J. Troup, Nicholas C. Soderstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National parks have mandates both to preserve and protect natural settings and to assist visitors in viewing and interacting with those settings. Considerable scholarship has examined the trade-offs between preservation and recreation goals, such as protection of a natural setting when some visitors want to experience it from noisy aircraft or ground vehicles. The current project expands on previous noise research that showed the presence of aircraft noise to be detrimental to aesthetic and affective environmental assessments. Participants rated 25 scenes under quiet conditions or while hearing 45 dB(A) or 60 dB(A) of either natural sounds (bird calls, breeze through foliage), natural sounds with aircraft sounds, natural sounds with ground traffic sounds, or natural sounds with human voices. Results indicated that the presence of any anthropogenic noise-air traffic, ground traffic, or voices-negatively impacted environmental assessments, and more so at louder levels, while the natural soundscape had little to no effect on assessments. Additionally, the presence of air traffic, ground traffic, and human voices significantly decreased participant ratings of serenity while also increasing ratings of hostility. These effects were strongest for scenes that were high in scenic beauty. Results are discussed in the context of sound quality management in national parks and other settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-111
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Noise
Aircraft
Air
Beauty
Recreation
Hostility
Hearing
Birds
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Benfield, Jacob A. ; Bell, Paul A. ; Troup, Lucy J. ; Soderstrom, Nicholas C. / Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 103-111.
@article{8051c2c588434c378b770811619dfd9b,
title = "Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment",
abstract = "National parks have mandates both to preserve and protect natural settings and to assist visitors in viewing and interacting with those settings. Considerable scholarship has examined the trade-offs between preservation and recreation goals, such as protection of a natural setting when some visitors want to experience it from noisy aircraft or ground vehicles. The current project expands on previous noise research that showed the presence of aircraft noise to be detrimental to aesthetic and affective environmental assessments. Participants rated 25 scenes under quiet conditions or while hearing 45 dB(A) or 60 dB(A) of either natural sounds (bird calls, breeze through foliage), natural sounds with aircraft sounds, natural sounds with ground traffic sounds, or natural sounds with human voices. Results indicated that the presence of any anthropogenic noise-air traffic, ground traffic, or voices-negatively impacted environmental assessments, and more so at louder levels, while the natural soundscape had little to no effect on assessments. Additionally, the presence of air traffic, ground traffic, and human voices significantly decreased participant ratings of serenity while also increasing ratings of hostility. These effects were strongest for scenes that were high in scenic beauty. Results are discussed in the context of sound quality management in national parks and other settings.",
author = "Benfield, {Jacob A.} and Bell, {Paul A.} and Troup, {Lucy J.} and Soderstrom, {Nicholas C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "103--111",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4944",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. / Benfield, Jacob A.; Bell, Paul A.; Troup, Lucy J.; Soderstrom, Nicholas C.

In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.03.2010, p. 103-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment

AU - Benfield, Jacob A.

AU - Bell, Paul A.

AU - Troup, Lucy J.

AU - Soderstrom, Nicholas C.

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - National parks have mandates both to preserve and protect natural settings and to assist visitors in viewing and interacting with those settings. Considerable scholarship has examined the trade-offs between preservation and recreation goals, such as protection of a natural setting when some visitors want to experience it from noisy aircraft or ground vehicles. The current project expands on previous noise research that showed the presence of aircraft noise to be detrimental to aesthetic and affective environmental assessments. Participants rated 25 scenes under quiet conditions or while hearing 45 dB(A) or 60 dB(A) of either natural sounds (bird calls, breeze through foliage), natural sounds with aircraft sounds, natural sounds with ground traffic sounds, or natural sounds with human voices. Results indicated that the presence of any anthropogenic noise-air traffic, ground traffic, or voices-negatively impacted environmental assessments, and more so at louder levels, while the natural soundscape had little to no effect on assessments. Additionally, the presence of air traffic, ground traffic, and human voices significantly decreased participant ratings of serenity while also increasing ratings of hostility. These effects were strongest for scenes that were high in scenic beauty. Results are discussed in the context of sound quality management in national parks and other settings.

AB - National parks have mandates both to preserve and protect natural settings and to assist visitors in viewing and interacting with those settings. Considerable scholarship has examined the trade-offs between preservation and recreation goals, such as protection of a natural setting when some visitors want to experience it from noisy aircraft or ground vehicles. The current project expands on previous noise research that showed the presence of aircraft noise to be detrimental to aesthetic and affective environmental assessments. Participants rated 25 scenes under quiet conditions or while hearing 45 dB(A) or 60 dB(A) of either natural sounds (bird calls, breeze through foliage), natural sounds with aircraft sounds, natural sounds with ground traffic sounds, or natural sounds with human voices. Results indicated that the presence of any anthropogenic noise-air traffic, ground traffic, or voices-negatively impacted environmental assessments, and more so at louder levels, while the natural soundscape had little to no effect on assessments. Additionally, the presence of air traffic, ground traffic, and human voices significantly decreased participant ratings of serenity while also increasing ratings of hostility. These effects were strongest for scenes that were high in scenic beauty. Results are discussed in the context of sound quality management in national parks and other settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76549119076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76549119076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:76549119076

VL - 30

SP - 103

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology

SN - 0272-4944

IS - 1

ER -