Affirmative action: One size does not fit all

Kala Krishna, Alexander Tarasov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper identifies a new reason for giving preferences to the disadvantaged using a model of contests. There are two forces at work: the effort effect working against giving preferences and the selection effect working in favor of them. When education is costly and easy to obtain (as in the United States), the selection effect dominates. When education is heavily subsidized and limited in supply (as in India), preferences are welfare reducing. The model also shows that unequal treatment of identical agents can be welfare improving, providing insights into when the counterintuitive policy of rationing educational access to some subgroups is welfare improving.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-252
Number of pages38
JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Education
Affirmative action
Selection effects
India
Rationing
Contests

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Krishna, Kala ; Tarasov, Alexander. / Affirmative action : One size does not fit all. In: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. 2016 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 215-252.
@article{c1444242f47f41a99ea0b47b47f4d154,
title = "Affirmative action: One size does not fit all",
abstract = "This paper identifies a new reason for giving preferences to the disadvantaged using a model of contests. There are two forces at work: the effort effect working against giving preferences and the selection effect working in favor of them. When education is costly and easy to obtain (as in the United States), the selection effect dominates. When education is heavily subsidized and limited in supply (as in India), preferences are welfare reducing. The model also shows that unequal treatment of identical agents can be welfare improving, providing insights into when the counterintuitive policy of rationing educational access to some subgroups is welfare improving.",
author = "Kala Krishna and Alexander Tarasov",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1257/mic.20140200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "215--252",
journal = "American Economic Journal: Microeconomics",
issn = "1945-7669",
publisher = "American Economic Association",
number = "2",

}

Affirmative action : One size does not fit all. / Krishna, Kala; Tarasov, Alexander.

In: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.05.2016, p. 215-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affirmative action

T2 - One size does not fit all

AU - Krishna, Kala

AU - Tarasov, Alexander

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - This paper identifies a new reason for giving preferences to the disadvantaged using a model of contests. There are two forces at work: the effort effect working against giving preferences and the selection effect working in favor of them. When education is costly and easy to obtain (as in the United States), the selection effect dominates. When education is heavily subsidized and limited in supply (as in India), preferences are welfare reducing. The model also shows that unequal treatment of identical agents can be welfare improving, providing insights into when the counterintuitive policy of rationing educational access to some subgroups is welfare improving.

AB - This paper identifies a new reason for giving preferences to the disadvantaged using a model of contests. There are two forces at work: the effort effect working against giving preferences and the selection effect working in favor of them. When education is costly and easy to obtain (as in the United States), the selection effect dominates. When education is heavily subsidized and limited in supply (as in India), preferences are welfare reducing. The model also shows that unequal treatment of identical agents can be welfare improving, providing insights into when the counterintuitive policy of rationing educational access to some subgroups is welfare improving.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968846635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968846635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1257/mic.20140200

DO - 10.1257/mic.20140200

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84968846635

VL - 8

SP - 215

EP - 252

JO - American Economic Journal: Microeconomics

JF - American Economic Journal: Microeconomics

SN - 1945-7669

IS - 2

ER -