AFHVS 2017 presidential address

The purpose-driven university: the role of university research in the era of science commercialization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As efforts to commercialize university research outputs continue, critics charge that universities and university scientists are failing to live up to their public-interest purpose. In this paper, I discuss the distinctions between public-interest and private-interest research institutions and how commercialization of university science may be undermining the public interest. I then use Jürgen Habermas’s concept of communicative action as the foundation for efforts to establish public spaces for ethical deliberation among scientists and university administrators. Such ethical deliberation is necessary to facilitate discussion on whether public-interest science should be the research university’s primary purpose and what institutional rules and resources are needed to honor that purpose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1021-1031
Number of pages11
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

university research
commercialization
research institutions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{e3e420a140e14215aa0d84a5f3dbec80,
title = "AFHVS 2017 presidential address: The purpose-driven university: the role of university research in the era of science commercialization",
abstract = "As efforts to commercialize university research outputs continue, critics charge that universities and university scientists are failing to live up to their public-interest purpose. In this paper, I discuss the distinctions between public-interest and private-interest research institutions and how commercialization of university science may be undermining the public interest. I then use J{\"u}rgen Habermas’s concept of communicative action as the foundation for efforts to establish public spaces for ethical deliberation among scientists and university administrators. Such ethical deliberation is necessary to facilitate discussion on whether public-interest science should be the research university’s primary purpose and what institutional rules and resources are needed to honor that purpose.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-017-9824-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "1021--1031",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AFHVS 2017 presidential address

T2 - The purpose-driven university: the role of university research in the era of science commercialization

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - As efforts to commercialize university research outputs continue, critics charge that universities and university scientists are failing to live up to their public-interest purpose. In this paper, I discuss the distinctions between public-interest and private-interest research institutions and how commercialization of university science may be undermining the public interest. I then use Jürgen Habermas’s concept of communicative action as the foundation for efforts to establish public spaces for ethical deliberation among scientists and university administrators. Such ethical deliberation is necessary to facilitate discussion on whether public-interest science should be the research university’s primary purpose and what institutional rules and resources are needed to honor that purpose.

AB - As efforts to commercialize university research outputs continue, critics charge that universities and university scientists are failing to live up to their public-interest purpose. In this paper, I discuss the distinctions between public-interest and private-interest research institutions and how commercialization of university science may be undermining the public interest. I then use Jürgen Habermas’s concept of communicative action as the foundation for efforts to establish public spaces for ethical deliberation among scientists and university administrators. Such ethical deliberation is necessary to facilitate discussion on whether public-interest science should be the research university’s primary purpose and what institutional rules and resources are needed to honor that purpose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028747222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028747222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-017-9824-6

DO - 10.1007/s10460-017-9824-6

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1021

EP - 1031

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 4

ER -