Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect

A coordinated analysis

Robert S. Stawski, Stacey B. Scott, Matthew J. Zawadzki, Martin John Sliwinski, David Marcusson-Clavertz, Jinhyuk Kim, Stephanie Trea Lanza, Paige A. Green, David Almeida, Joshua Morrison Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Advancing age is often characterized by preserved or even enhanced emotion regulation, which is thought to manifest in terms of age-related reductions in the within-person association between stressors and negative affect. Existing research from ecological momentary assessment and end-of-day daily diary studies examining such age-related benefits have yielded mixed results, potentially due to differences in samples, design, and measurement of everyday stressors and negative affect. We conducted a coordinated analysis of 5 ecological momentary assessments and 2 end-of-day daily diary studies to examine adult age differences in the within-person association between everyday stressors and negative affect. Reported stressor occurrences are robustly associated with higher negative affect, regardless of study design and sample characteristics. Across studies, interactions between age and everyday stressors predicting negative affect revealed a pattern of age-related decreases in the stressor-negative affect association, but this interaction was only significant for 2 studies. Further, examination of statistical power of the included studies suggests that, despite differences in the number of repeated assessments, power to detect within-person stressor-negative affect associations is quite good. In contrast, despite possessing wider age ranges, observed age differences were relatively small in magnitude, and studies are potentially underpowered to detect age differences in these within-person associations. We discuss the importance of study design, interval of repeated assessments and number of participants for examining age differences in everyday stressors and negative affect, as well as the virtue of coordinated analyses for detecting consistent direction of associations, but inconsistent patterns of statistical significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-105
Number of pages15
JournalPsychology and Aging
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emotions
Research
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Direction compound
Power (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Stawski, Robert S. ; Scott, Stacey B. ; Zawadzki, Matthew J. ; Sliwinski, Martin John ; Marcusson-Clavertz, David ; Kim, Jinhyuk ; Lanza, Stephanie Trea ; Green, Paige A. ; Almeida, David ; Smyth, Joshua Morrison. / Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect : A coordinated analysis. In: Psychology and Aging. 2019 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 91-105.
@article{a7f40bde05534d27b484de1d8e3f4acb,
title = "Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect: A coordinated analysis",
abstract = "Advancing age is often characterized by preserved or even enhanced emotion regulation, which is thought to manifest in terms of age-related reductions in the within-person association between stressors and negative affect. Existing research from ecological momentary assessment and end-of-day daily diary studies examining such age-related benefits have yielded mixed results, potentially due to differences in samples, design, and measurement of everyday stressors and negative affect. We conducted a coordinated analysis of 5 ecological momentary assessments and 2 end-of-day daily diary studies to examine adult age differences in the within-person association between everyday stressors and negative affect. Reported stressor occurrences are robustly associated with higher negative affect, regardless of study design and sample characteristics. Across studies, interactions between age and everyday stressors predicting negative affect revealed a pattern of age-related decreases in the stressor-negative affect association, but this interaction was only significant for 2 studies. Further, examination of statistical power of the included studies suggests that, despite differences in the number of repeated assessments, power to detect within-person stressor-negative affect associations is quite good. In contrast, despite possessing wider age ranges, observed age differences were relatively small in magnitude, and studies are potentially underpowered to detect age differences in these within-person associations. We discuss the importance of study design, interval of repeated assessments and number of participants for examining age differences in everyday stressors and negative affect, as well as the virtue of coordinated analyses for detecting consistent direction of associations, but inconsistent patterns of statistical significance.",
author = "Stawski, {Robert S.} and Scott, {Stacey B.} and Zawadzki, {Matthew J.} and Sliwinski, {Martin John} and David Marcusson-Clavertz and Jinhyuk Kim and Lanza, {Stephanie Trea} and Green, {Paige A.} and David Almeida and Smyth, {Joshua Morrison}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pag0000309",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "91--105",
journal = "Psychology and Aging",
issn = "0882-7974",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect : A coordinated analysis. / Stawski, Robert S.; Scott, Stacey B.; Zawadzki, Matthew J.; Sliwinski, Martin John; Marcusson-Clavertz, David; Kim, Jinhyuk; Lanza, Stephanie Trea; Green, Paige A.; Almeida, David; Smyth, Joshua Morrison.

In: Psychology and Aging, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 91-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect

T2 - A coordinated analysis

AU - Stawski, Robert S.

AU - Scott, Stacey B.

AU - Zawadzki, Matthew J.

AU - Sliwinski, Martin John

AU - Marcusson-Clavertz, David

AU - Kim, Jinhyuk

AU - Lanza, Stephanie Trea

AU - Green, Paige A.

AU - Almeida, David

AU - Smyth, Joshua Morrison

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Advancing age is often characterized by preserved or even enhanced emotion regulation, which is thought to manifest in terms of age-related reductions in the within-person association between stressors and negative affect. Existing research from ecological momentary assessment and end-of-day daily diary studies examining such age-related benefits have yielded mixed results, potentially due to differences in samples, design, and measurement of everyday stressors and negative affect. We conducted a coordinated analysis of 5 ecological momentary assessments and 2 end-of-day daily diary studies to examine adult age differences in the within-person association between everyday stressors and negative affect. Reported stressor occurrences are robustly associated with higher negative affect, regardless of study design and sample characteristics. Across studies, interactions between age and everyday stressors predicting negative affect revealed a pattern of age-related decreases in the stressor-negative affect association, but this interaction was only significant for 2 studies. Further, examination of statistical power of the included studies suggests that, despite differences in the number of repeated assessments, power to detect within-person stressor-negative affect associations is quite good. In contrast, despite possessing wider age ranges, observed age differences were relatively small in magnitude, and studies are potentially underpowered to detect age differences in these within-person associations. We discuss the importance of study design, interval of repeated assessments and number of participants for examining age differences in everyday stressors and negative affect, as well as the virtue of coordinated analyses for detecting consistent direction of associations, but inconsistent patterns of statistical significance.

AB - Advancing age is often characterized by preserved or even enhanced emotion regulation, which is thought to manifest in terms of age-related reductions in the within-person association between stressors and negative affect. Existing research from ecological momentary assessment and end-of-day daily diary studies examining such age-related benefits have yielded mixed results, potentially due to differences in samples, design, and measurement of everyday stressors and negative affect. We conducted a coordinated analysis of 5 ecological momentary assessments and 2 end-of-day daily diary studies to examine adult age differences in the within-person association between everyday stressors and negative affect. Reported stressor occurrences are robustly associated with higher negative affect, regardless of study design and sample characteristics. Across studies, interactions between age and everyday stressors predicting negative affect revealed a pattern of age-related decreases in the stressor-negative affect association, but this interaction was only significant for 2 studies. Further, examination of statistical power of the included studies suggests that, despite differences in the number of repeated assessments, power to detect within-person stressor-negative affect associations is quite good. In contrast, despite possessing wider age ranges, observed age differences were relatively small in magnitude, and studies are potentially underpowered to detect age differences in these within-person associations. We discuss the importance of study design, interval of repeated assessments and number of participants for examining age differences in everyday stressors and negative affect, as well as the virtue of coordinated analyses for detecting consistent direction of associations, but inconsistent patterns of statistical significance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058372600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058372600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pag0000309

DO - 10.1037/pag0000309

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 91

EP - 105

JO - Psychology and Aging

JF - Psychology and Aging

SN - 0882-7974

IS - 1

ER -