TY - JOUR
T1 - Age Differences in Proactive Coping with Minor Hassles in Daily Life
AU - Neubauer, Andreas B.
AU - Smyth, Joshua M.
AU - Sliwinski, Martin J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (grant number R01-AG026728).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Objectives Age differences in the exposure to minor hassles in daily life have been postulated by socioemotional selectivity theory and reported by previous research, with older adults reporting fewer stressors. The present study examined two potential mechanisms explaining this reduction in reported stressor exposure with advancing age: age-related changes in proactive coping and in the threshold of labeling an event as stressor. Method Participants (N = 178; 20-79 years; M = 49.5; SD = 17; 51% female) were investigated in a measurement burst study consisting of three measurement bursts (each comprised of five daily assessments for 7 consecutive days), separated by 9 months each. Results Older age was unrelated to reporting an event or the thresholds for labeling the event as a stressor, but was positively related to self-reported use of proactive coping and negatively related to reported event severity. Discussion Results are consistent with the view that older adults engage in more proactive coping to deal with minor hassles in their daily lives to manage these problems before they become more stressful. Older adults did not report fewer potentially stressful events but they reported these events as less unpleasant. The adaptive value of proactive coping, in particular for older adults, is discussed.
AB - Objectives Age differences in the exposure to minor hassles in daily life have been postulated by socioemotional selectivity theory and reported by previous research, with older adults reporting fewer stressors. The present study examined two potential mechanisms explaining this reduction in reported stressor exposure with advancing age: age-related changes in proactive coping and in the threshold of labeling an event as stressor. Method Participants (N = 178; 20-79 years; M = 49.5; SD = 17; 51% female) were investigated in a measurement burst study consisting of three measurement bursts (each comprised of five daily assessments for 7 consecutive days), separated by 9 months each. Results Older age was unrelated to reporting an event or the thresholds for labeling the event as a stressor, but was positively related to self-reported use of proactive coping and negatively related to reported event severity. Discussion Results are consistent with the view that older adults engage in more proactive coping to deal with minor hassles in their daily lives to manage these problems before they become more stressful. Older adults did not report fewer potentially stressful events but they reported these events as less unpleasant. The adaptive value of proactive coping, in particular for older adults, is discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058897976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058897976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/geronb/gby061
DO - 10.1093/geronb/gby061
M3 - Article
C2 - 29931247
AN - SCOPUS:85058897976
SN - 1079-5014
VL - 74
SP - 7
EP - 16
JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
IS - 1
ER -