Agency interpretations

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What does it mean to say that an administrative agency is a source of law? Agencies constantly generate what our society regards as law, making and remaking legal obligations at a frenetic pace. Yet most of the rules agencies make lack the force of law and recognizing those that have this force is often an exceptionally complicated task. It is a task, in fact, that courts are usually not suited to performing, at least not very well. In this Article, I argue that the nature of contemporary legislative language and our turn toward informal agency processes have combined to render the bulk of lawmaking in our society unrecognizable within our conventional pictures of legality. If legal rules are, as most positivists maintain, simply "exclusionary reasons" by which legal actors guide their conduct, agency rules that are never enacted as "law" are becoming more and more of our law's content. Informal processes like notice and comment were neither the beginning nor the culmination of our legal system's departure from traditional, standardized forms of law. But they may be the best evidence of a highly plastic concept of law that is ascendant today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)657-701
Number of pages45
JournalTemple Law Review
Volume82
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

interpretation
Law
source of law
legality
legal system
obligation
lack
language
evidence
Society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

Colburn, Jamison E. / Agency interpretations. In: Temple Law Review. 2009 ; Vol. 82, No. 3. pp. 657-701.
@article{ed3c115705f84238862c8ba7c05656d4,
title = "Agency interpretations",
abstract = "What does it mean to say that an administrative agency is a source of law? Agencies constantly generate what our society regards as law, making and remaking legal obligations at a frenetic pace. Yet most of the rules agencies make lack the force of law and recognizing those that have this force is often an exceptionally complicated task. It is a task, in fact, that courts are usually not suited to performing, at least not very well. In this Article, I argue that the nature of contemporary legislative language and our turn toward informal agency processes have combined to render the bulk of lawmaking in our society unrecognizable within our conventional pictures of legality. If legal rules are, as most positivists maintain, simply {"}exclusionary reasons{"} by which legal actors guide their conduct, agency rules that are never enacted as {"}law{"} are becoming more and more of our law's content. Informal processes like notice and comment were neither the beginning nor the culmination of our legal system's departure from traditional, standardized forms of law. But they may be the best evidence of a highly plastic concept of law that is ascendant today.",
author = "Colburn, {Jamison E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "657--701",
journal = "Temple Law Review",
issn = "0899-8086",
publisher = "Temple University",
number = "3",

}

Colburn, JE 2009, 'Agency interpretations', Temple Law Review, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 657-701.

Agency interpretations. / Colburn, Jamison E.

In: Temple Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 657-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agency interpretations

AU - Colburn, Jamison E.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - What does it mean to say that an administrative agency is a source of law? Agencies constantly generate what our society regards as law, making and remaking legal obligations at a frenetic pace. Yet most of the rules agencies make lack the force of law and recognizing those that have this force is often an exceptionally complicated task. It is a task, in fact, that courts are usually not suited to performing, at least not very well. In this Article, I argue that the nature of contemporary legislative language and our turn toward informal agency processes have combined to render the bulk of lawmaking in our society unrecognizable within our conventional pictures of legality. If legal rules are, as most positivists maintain, simply "exclusionary reasons" by which legal actors guide their conduct, agency rules that are never enacted as "law" are becoming more and more of our law's content. Informal processes like notice and comment were neither the beginning nor the culmination of our legal system's departure from traditional, standardized forms of law. But they may be the best evidence of a highly plastic concept of law that is ascendant today.

AB - What does it mean to say that an administrative agency is a source of law? Agencies constantly generate what our society regards as law, making and remaking legal obligations at a frenetic pace. Yet most of the rules agencies make lack the force of law and recognizing those that have this force is often an exceptionally complicated task. It is a task, in fact, that courts are usually not suited to performing, at least not very well. In this Article, I argue that the nature of contemporary legislative language and our turn toward informal agency processes have combined to render the bulk of lawmaking in our society unrecognizable within our conventional pictures of legality. If legal rules are, as most positivists maintain, simply "exclusionary reasons" by which legal actors guide their conduct, agency rules that are never enacted as "law" are becoming more and more of our law's content. Informal processes like notice and comment were neither the beginning nor the culmination of our legal system's departure from traditional, standardized forms of law. But they may be the best evidence of a highly plastic concept of law that is ascendant today.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251556859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251556859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:79251556859

VL - 82

SP - 657

EP - 701

JO - Temple Law Review

JF - Temple Law Review

SN - 0899-8086

IS - 3

ER -