Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge

Paul Kockelman, Asif Agha, Laura M. Ahearn, Vincent Colapietro, Marcel Danesi, Alessandro Duranti, Nick J. Enfield, Jeff Sugarman, Jean Pierre Warnier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using a Peircean theory of meaning, agency may be theorized in terms of flexibility and accountability, on the one hand, and knowledge and power, on the other. In this theory, residential agency, which is closest to notions such as "power" and "choice," is the degree to which one can control the expression of a sign, compose a sign-object relation, and commit to an interpretant of this sign-object relation. Representational agency, which is closest to notions such as "knowledge" and "consciousness," is the degree to which one can thematize a process, characterize a feature of this theme, and reason with this theme-character relation. Agency, as a kind of social and semiotic facility, is thereby theorized as multidimensional, graduated, and distributed. This theory allows one to analyze, as concomitant phenomena, the longue durée processes that underlie relatively perduring institutions and the real-time practices that support relatively fleeting interactions. Finally, it highlights the theoretical and empirical terrain shared by linguistic anthropology, science and technology studies, political economy, and critical theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-401
Number of pages27
JournalCurrent anthropology
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Archaeology
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kockelman, P., Agha, A., Ahearn, L. M., Colapietro, V., Danesi, M., Duranti, A., Enfield, N. J., Sugarman, J., & Warnier, J. P. (2007). Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge. Current anthropology, 48(3), 375-401. https://doi.org/10.1086/512998