Aggression or ovarian development as determinants of reproductive dominance in Bombus terrestris: Interpretation using a simulation model

E. Amsalem, D. Shamia, A. Hefetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Insect societies generally manifest reproductive division of labor with one or a few fecund females (queens) and sterile helpers (workers). This is generally mediated by behavioural hierarchy that reduces the cost of within-group aggression. Aggressive behaviour and ovarian development are thus two co-occurring correlates of reproductive skew, but their mutual influence remains unclear. Here we examined the interplay between these factors by constructing a simulation model, based on the biology of Bombus terrestris, to test whether aggression levels are determined by the level of ovarian development or vice versa. We approached this question using virtual groups composed of either equally or unequally matched workers, as well as supplementing the simulation data by experimental data using actual bee groups. The simulation revealed that previous encounter experience (win/lose) rather than mutual assessment of reproductive status determines and maintains hierarchy in B. terrestris. Furthermore, although bumblebee workers largely vary in their aggression tendencies, pre-existing differences between nest-mates were not obligatory for establishment of the hierarchy. The initially formed linear hierarchy became polynomial after 10 days, clearly separating between egg-laying workers and helpers. This was consistent with the results obtained for actual bee groups. We propose that aggressive behaviour and the outcome of previous encounters are major determinants of ovarian development and not vice versa. Workers may gain a head start in the competition due to variation in their innate aggressive tendencies, or by fortuitously winning their first encounters. Small differences in aggressiveness between workers are amplified to initially form a short-term linear hierarchy that subsequently turns to polynomial hierarchy, creating the most basic phenomenon of social groups, reproductive division of labor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-222
Number of pages10
JournalInsectes Sociaux
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 18 2013

Fingerprint

Bombus terrestris
ovarian development
aggression
simulation models
labor division
bee
simulation
polyethism
reproductive status
Apoidea
Head Start
insect colonies
nest
Bombus
insect
egg
queen insects
oviposition
nests
cost

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science

Cite this

@article{ad986948832443a4a3148eaff02317b3,
title = "Aggression or ovarian development as determinants of reproductive dominance in Bombus terrestris: Interpretation using a simulation model",
abstract = "Insect societies generally manifest reproductive division of labor with one or a few fecund females (queens) and sterile helpers (workers). This is generally mediated by behavioural hierarchy that reduces the cost of within-group aggression. Aggressive behaviour and ovarian development are thus two co-occurring correlates of reproductive skew, but their mutual influence remains unclear. Here we examined the interplay between these factors by constructing a simulation model, based on the biology of Bombus terrestris, to test whether aggression levels are determined by the level of ovarian development or vice versa. We approached this question using virtual groups composed of either equally or unequally matched workers, as well as supplementing the simulation data by experimental data using actual bee groups. The simulation revealed that previous encounter experience (win/lose) rather than mutual assessment of reproductive status determines and maintains hierarchy in B. terrestris. Furthermore, although bumblebee workers largely vary in their aggression tendencies, pre-existing differences between nest-mates were not obligatory for establishment of the hierarchy. The initially formed linear hierarchy became polynomial after 10 days, clearly separating between egg-laying workers and helpers. This was consistent with the results obtained for actual bee groups. We propose that aggressive behaviour and the outcome of previous encounters are major determinants of ovarian development and not vice versa. Workers may gain a head start in the competition due to variation in their innate aggressive tendencies, or by fortuitously winning their first encounters. Small differences in aggressiveness between workers are amplified to initially form a short-term linear hierarchy that subsequently turns to polynomial hierarchy, creating the most basic phenomenon of social groups, reproductive division of labor.",
author = "E. Amsalem and D. Shamia and A. Hefetz",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s00040-013-0285-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "213--222",
journal = "Insectes Sociaux",
issn = "0020-1812",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",
number = "2",

}

Aggression or ovarian development as determinants of reproductive dominance in Bombus terrestris : Interpretation using a simulation model. / Amsalem, E.; Shamia, D.; Hefetz, A.

In: Insectes Sociaux, Vol. 60, No. 2, 18.02.2013, p. 213-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aggression or ovarian development as determinants of reproductive dominance in Bombus terrestris

T2 - Interpretation using a simulation model

AU - Amsalem, E.

AU - Shamia, D.

AU - Hefetz, A.

PY - 2013/2/18

Y1 - 2013/2/18

N2 - Insect societies generally manifest reproductive division of labor with one or a few fecund females (queens) and sterile helpers (workers). This is generally mediated by behavioural hierarchy that reduces the cost of within-group aggression. Aggressive behaviour and ovarian development are thus two co-occurring correlates of reproductive skew, but their mutual influence remains unclear. Here we examined the interplay between these factors by constructing a simulation model, based on the biology of Bombus terrestris, to test whether aggression levels are determined by the level of ovarian development or vice versa. We approached this question using virtual groups composed of either equally or unequally matched workers, as well as supplementing the simulation data by experimental data using actual bee groups. The simulation revealed that previous encounter experience (win/lose) rather than mutual assessment of reproductive status determines and maintains hierarchy in B. terrestris. Furthermore, although bumblebee workers largely vary in their aggression tendencies, pre-existing differences between nest-mates were not obligatory for establishment of the hierarchy. The initially formed linear hierarchy became polynomial after 10 days, clearly separating between egg-laying workers and helpers. This was consistent with the results obtained for actual bee groups. We propose that aggressive behaviour and the outcome of previous encounters are major determinants of ovarian development and not vice versa. Workers may gain a head start in the competition due to variation in their innate aggressive tendencies, or by fortuitously winning their first encounters. Small differences in aggressiveness between workers are amplified to initially form a short-term linear hierarchy that subsequently turns to polynomial hierarchy, creating the most basic phenomenon of social groups, reproductive division of labor.

AB - Insect societies generally manifest reproductive division of labor with one or a few fecund females (queens) and sterile helpers (workers). This is generally mediated by behavioural hierarchy that reduces the cost of within-group aggression. Aggressive behaviour and ovarian development are thus two co-occurring correlates of reproductive skew, but their mutual influence remains unclear. Here we examined the interplay between these factors by constructing a simulation model, based on the biology of Bombus terrestris, to test whether aggression levels are determined by the level of ovarian development or vice versa. We approached this question using virtual groups composed of either equally or unequally matched workers, as well as supplementing the simulation data by experimental data using actual bee groups. The simulation revealed that previous encounter experience (win/lose) rather than mutual assessment of reproductive status determines and maintains hierarchy in B. terrestris. Furthermore, although bumblebee workers largely vary in their aggression tendencies, pre-existing differences between nest-mates were not obligatory for establishment of the hierarchy. The initially formed linear hierarchy became polynomial after 10 days, clearly separating between egg-laying workers and helpers. This was consistent with the results obtained for actual bee groups. We propose that aggressive behaviour and the outcome of previous encounters are major determinants of ovarian development and not vice versa. Workers may gain a head start in the competition due to variation in their innate aggressive tendencies, or by fortuitously winning their first encounters. Small differences in aggressiveness between workers are amplified to initially form a short-term linear hierarchy that subsequently turns to polynomial hierarchy, creating the most basic phenomenon of social groups, reproductive division of labor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876076938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876076938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00040-013-0285-7

DO - 10.1007/s00040-013-0285-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876076938

VL - 60

SP - 213

EP - 222

JO - Insectes Sociaux

JF - Insectes Sociaux

SN - 0020-1812

IS - 2

ER -