Aging and the Rising Costs of Healthcare in the United States: Can There be a Solution?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

As a result of the aging of American society and the fact that older persons require a great deal more healthcare and much more expensive treatments, the costs are on the rise and  spiraling out of control. As a solution, ethicists Daniel Callahan and others have proposed healthcare rationing on the basis of age. On the basis of utilitarian ethicist, these writers have argued that age-based rationing will lead to the provision of healthcare to the greatest number of people. Of course, utilizing other ethical theories other writers have opposed the rationing of healthcare on the basis of age. The paper presents the arguments made, and the ethical theories employed, by both sides, which suggest an ethical dilemma, thus most probably a debate about age-based rationing in the future. The author found it interesting to seek the views of professors teaching healthcare –related courses about this type of rationing. Utilizing grounded theory/ quantitative research methodology, designing a questionnaire that included some 14 questions, the author interviewed some 18 professors of healthcare courses in Pennsylvania. Utilizing grounded theory in the analysis of the results of the interviews led to some eight interesting themes, which are presented and analyzed in the paper. After presenting the results of that study, and not finding the application of age-based rationing feasible, the paper also discusses other alternative solutions for reducing healthcare costs, including the notion of fair innings suggested by Allan Williams. All these alternatives are discussed in the paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-247
Number of pages19
JournalAgeing International
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2015

Fingerprint

rationing
Health Care Costs
Health Care Rationing
Ethical Theory
Ethicists
Delivery of Health Care
costs
grounded theory
university teacher
writer
Teaching
Research Design
quantitative research
Interviews
questionnaire
methodology
interview
Grounded Theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)

Cite this

@article{cad5af17ffdf4b828a3ac3a6d5d1e2bf,
title = "Aging and the Rising Costs of Healthcare in the United States: Can There be a Solution?",
abstract = "As a result of the aging of American society and the fact that older persons require a great deal more healthcare and much more expensive treatments, the costs are on the rise and  spiraling out of control. As a solution, ethicists Daniel Callahan and others have proposed healthcare rationing on the basis of age. On the basis of utilitarian ethicist, these writers have argued that age-based rationing will lead to the provision of healthcare to the greatest number of people. Of course, utilizing other ethical theories other writers have opposed the rationing of healthcare on the basis of age. The paper presents the arguments made, and the ethical theories employed, by both sides, which suggest an ethical dilemma, thus most probably a debate about age-based rationing in the future. The author found it interesting to seek the views of professors teaching healthcare –related courses about this type of rationing. Utilizing grounded theory/ quantitative research methodology, designing a questionnaire that included some 14 questions, the author interviewed some 18 professors of healthcare courses in Pennsylvania. Utilizing grounded theory in the analysis of the results of the interviews led to some eight interesting themes, which are presented and analyzed in the paper. After presenting the results of that study, and not finding the application of age-based rationing feasible, the paper also discusses other alternative solutions for reducing healthcare costs, including the notion of fair innings suggested by Allan Williams. All these alternatives are discussed in the paper.",
author = "Hengameh Hosseini",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s12126-014-9209-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "229--247",
journal = "Ageing International",
issn = "0163-5158",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Aging and the Rising Costs of Healthcare in the United States : Can There be a Solution? / Hosseini, Hengameh.

In: Ageing International, Vol. 40, No. 3, 18.09.2015, p. 229-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aging and the Rising Costs of Healthcare in the United States

T2 - Can There be a Solution?

AU - Hosseini, Hengameh

PY - 2015/9/18

Y1 - 2015/9/18

N2 - As a result of the aging of American society and the fact that older persons require a great deal more healthcare and much more expensive treatments, the costs are on the rise and  spiraling out of control. As a solution, ethicists Daniel Callahan and others have proposed healthcare rationing on the basis of age. On the basis of utilitarian ethicist, these writers have argued that age-based rationing will lead to the provision of healthcare to the greatest number of people. Of course, utilizing other ethical theories other writers have opposed the rationing of healthcare on the basis of age. The paper presents the arguments made, and the ethical theories employed, by both sides, which suggest an ethical dilemma, thus most probably a debate about age-based rationing in the future. The author found it interesting to seek the views of professors teaching healthcare –related courses about this type of rationing. Utilizing grounded theory/ quantitative research methodology, designing a questionnaire that included some 14 questions, the author interviewed some 18 professors of healthcare courses in Pennsylvania. Utilizing grounded theory in the analysis of the results of the interviews led to some eight interesting themes, which are presented and analyzed in the paper. After presenting the results of that study, and not finding the application of age-based rationing feasible, the paper also discusses other alternative solutions for reducing healthcare costs, including the notion of fair innings suggested by Allan Williams. All these alternatives are discussed in the paper.

AB - As a result of the aging of American society and the fact that older persons require a great deal more healthcare and much more expensive treatments, the costs are on the rise and  spiraling out of control. As a solution, ethicists Daniel Callahan and others have proposed healthcare rationing on the basis of age. On the basis of utilitarian ethicist, these writers have argued that age-based rationing will lead to the provision of healthcare to the greatest number of people. Of course, utilizing other ethical theories other writers have opposed the rationing of healthcare on the basis of age. The paper presents the arguments made, and the ethical theories employed, by both sides, which suggest an ethical dilemma, thus most probably a debate about age-based rationing in the future. The author found it interesting to seek the views of professors teaching healthcare –related courses about this type of rationing. Utilizing grounded theory/ quantitative research methodology, designing a questionnaire that included some 14 questions, the author interviewed some 18 professors of healthcare courses in Pennsylvania. Utilizing grounded theory in the analysis of the results of the interviews led to some eight interesting themes, which are presented and analyzed in the paper. After presenting the results of that study, and not finding the application of age-based rationing feasible, the paper also discusses other alternative solutions for reducing healthcare costs, including the notion of fair innings suggested by Allan Williams. All these alternatives are discussed in the paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939254842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939254842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12126-014-9209-8

DO - 10.1007/s12126-014-9209-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939254842

VL - 40

SP - 229

EP - 247

JO - Ageing International

JF - Ageing International

SN - 0163-5158

IS - 3

ER -