AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here?

Mayur Jayarao, Shelly D. Timmons

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The development of reliable, rapid, and easy-to-use scoring systems for determination severity of injury has been a major focus of trauma care and resuscitation for the past few decades. Such scales, most especially the Glasgow Coma Score in traumatic brain injury, have dramatically enhanced the ability of emergency personnel, physicians, and nurses to communicate the status and severity of injury in shorthand form, both verbally and in records, so that the broader medical community can immediately understand the clinical scenario when interpreting them. Furthermore, utilization of scoring systems to prognosticate has also been attempted with some modicum of success, but the scoring systems when used in isolation or even in combination with one another do have limitations and should be used with this in mind. Commonly employed systems aimed at classifying the totality of injury burden either by organ system or the body as a whole include the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). This chapter discusses these scales/scores, their origins, utility and limitations, and their correlation with outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNeurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages47-50
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9783319402086
ISBN (Print)9783319402062
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Injury Severity Score
Wounds and Injuries
Shorthand
Coma
Resuscitation
Emergencies
Nurses
Physicians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Jayarao, M., & Timmons, S. D. (2017). AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here? In Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient (pp. 47-50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40208-6_6
Jayarao, Mayur ; Timmons, Shelly D. / AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here?. Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient. Springer International Publishing, 2017. pp. 47-50
@inbook{e5bd604b5304403bb3f5d006bb606d91,
title = "AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here?",
abstract = "The development of reliable, rapid, and easy-to-use scoring systems for determination severity of injury has been a major focus of trauma care and resuscitation for the past few decades. Such scales, most especially the Glasgow Coma Score in traumatic brain injury, have dramatically enhanced the ability of emergency personnel, physicians, and nurses to communicate the status and severity of injury in shorthand form, both verbally and in records, so that the broader medical community can immediately understand the clinical scenario when interpreting them. Furthermore, utilization of scoring systems to prognosticate has also been attempted with some modicum of success, but the scoring systems when used in isolation or even in combination with one another do have limitations and should be used with this in mind. Commonly employed systems aimed at classifying the totality of injury burden either by organ system or the body as a whole include the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). This chapter discusses these scales/scores, their origins, utility and limitations, and their correlation with outcome.",
author = "Mayur Jayarao and Timmons, {Shelly D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-40208-6_6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319402062",
pages = "47--50",
booktitle = "Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

Jayarao, M & Timmons, SD 2017, AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here? in Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient. Springer International Publishing, pp. 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40208-6_6

AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here? / Jayarao, Mayur; Timmons, Shelly D.

Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 47-50.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here?

AU - Jayarao, Mayur

AU - Timmons, Shelly D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The development of reliable, rapid, and easy-to-use scoring systems for determination severity of injury has been a major focus of trauma care and resuscitation for the past few decades. Such scales, most especially the Glasgow Coma Score in traumatic brain injury, have dramatically enhanced the ability of emergency personnel, physicians, and nurses to communicate the status and severity of injury in shorthand form, both verbally and in records, so that the broader medical community can immediately understand the clinical scenario when interpreting them. Furthermore, utilization of scoring systems to prognosticate has also been attempted with some modicum of success, but the scoring systems when used in isolation or even in combination with one another do have limitations and should be used with this in mind. Commonly employed systems aimed at classifying the totality of injury burden either by organ system or the body as a whole include the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). This chapter discusses these scales/scores, their origins, utility and limitations, and their correlation with outcome.

AB - The development of reliable, rapid, and easy-to-use scoring systems for determination severity of injury has been a major focus of trauma care and resuscitation for the past few decades. Such scales, most especially the Glasgow Coma Score in traumatic brain injury, have dramatically enhanced the ability of emergency personnel, physicians, and nurses to communicate the status and severity of injury in shorthand form, both verbally and in records, so that the broader medical community can immediately understand the clinical scenario when interpreting them. Furthermore, utilization of scoring systems to prognosticate has also been attempted with some modicum of success, but the scoring systems when used in isolation or even in combination with one another do have limitations and should be used with this in mind. Commonly employed systems aimed at classifying the totality of injury burden either by organ system or the body as a whole include the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). This chapter discusses these scales/scores, their origins, utility and limitations, and their correlation with outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028831915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028831915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-40208-6_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-40208-6_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85028831915

SN - 9783319402062

SP - 47

EP - 50

BT - Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Jayarao M, Timmons SD. AIS versus ISS versus GCS-what’s going on here? In Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient. Springer International Publishing. 2017. p. 47-50 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40208-6_6