Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables

Aleksandra B. Slavkovic, Stephen E. Fienberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contingency tables represent the joint distribution of categorical variables. In this chapter we use modern algebraic geometry to update the geometric representation of 2 × 2 contingency tables first explored in (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970). Then we use this geometry for a series of new ends including various characterizations of the joint distribution in terms of combinations of margins, conditionals, and odds ratios. We also consider incomplete characterisations of the joint distribution and the link to latent class models and to the phenomenon known as Simpson’s paradox. Many of the ideas explored here generalise rather naturally to I × J and higher-way tables. We end with a brief discussion of generalisations and open problems.Introduction (Pearson 1956) in his presidential address to the Royal Statistical Society was one of the earliest statistical authors towrite explicitly about the role of geometric thinking for the theory of statistics, although many authors previously, such as (Edgeworth 1914) and (Fisher 1921), had relied heuristically upon geometric characterisations. For contingency tables, beginning with (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970), several authors have exploited the geometric representation of contingency table models, in terms of quantities such as margins and odds ratios, both for the proof of statistical results and to gain deeper understanding of models used for contingency table representation. For example, see (Fienberg 1970) for the convergence of iterative proportional fitting procedure, (Diaconis 1977) for the geometric representation of exchangeability, and (Kenett 1983) for uses in exploratory data analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAlgebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages63-82
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780511642401
ISBN (Print)9780521896191
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Algebraic Geometry
Contingency Table
Geometric Representation
Joint Distribution
Odds Ratio
Margin
Simpson's Paradox
Exchangeability
Latent Class Model
Exploratory Data Analysis
Categorical variable
Tables
Open Problems
Update
Directly proportional
Statistics
Generalise
Series
Model

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

Slavkovic, A. B., & Fienberg, S. E. (2009). Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables. In Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics (pp. 63-82). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004
Slavkovic, Aleksandra B. ; Fienberg, Stephen E. / Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables. Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 63-82
@inbook{84c707b29948434a887fcec4553003ed,
title = "Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables",
abstract = "Contingency tables represent the joint distribution of categorical variables. In this chapter we use modern algebraic geometry to update the geometric representation of 2 × 2 contingency tables first explored in (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970). Then we use this geometry for a series of new ends including various characterizations of the joint distribution in terms of combinations of margins, conditionals, and odds ratios. We also consider incomplete characterisations of the joint distribution and the link to latent class models and to the phenomenon known as Simpson’s paradox. Many of the ideas explored here generalise rather naturally to I × J and higher-way tables. We end with a brief discussion of generalisations and open problems.Introduction (Pearson 1956) in his presidential address to the Royal Statistical Society was one of the earliest statistical authors towrite explicitly about the role of geometric thinking for the theory of statistics, although many authors previously, such as (Edgeworth 1914) and (Fisher 1921), had relied heuristically upon geometric characterisations. For contingency tables, beginning with (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970), several authors have exploited the geometric representation of contingency table models, in terms of quantities such as margins and odds ratios, both for the proof of statistical results and to gain deeper understanding of models used for contingency table representation. For example, see (Fienberg 1970) for the convergence of iterative proportional fitting procedure, (Diaconis 1977) for the geometric representation of exchangeability, and (Kenett 1983) for uses in exploratory data analysis.",
author = "Slavkovic, {Aleksandra B.} and Fienberg, {Stephen E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521896191",
pages = "63--82",
booktitle = "Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Slavkovic, AB & Fienberg, SE 2009, Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables. in Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004

Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables. / Slavkovic, Aleksandra B.; Fienberg, Stephen E.

Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 63-82.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables

AU - Slavkovic, Aleksandra B.

AU - Fienberg, Stephen E.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Contingency tables represent the joint distribution of categorical variables. In this chapter we use modern algebraic geometry to update the geometric representation of 2 × 2 contingency tables first explored in (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970). Then we use this geometry for a series of new ends including various characterizations of the joint distribution in terms of combinations of margins, conditionals, and odds ratios. We also consider incomplete characterisations of the joint distribution and the link to latent class models and to the phenomenon known as Simpson’s paradox. Many of the ideas explored here generalise rather naturally to I × J and higher-way tables. We end with a brief discussion of generalisations and open problems.Introduction (Pearson 1956) in his presidential address to the Royal Statistical Society was one of the earliest statistical authors towrite explicitly about the role of geometric thinking for the theory of statistics, although many authors previously, such as (Edgeworth 1914) and (Fisher 1921), had relied heuristically upon geometric characterisations. For contingency tables, beginning with (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970), several authors have exploited the geometric representation of contingency table models, in terms of quantities such as margins and odds ratios, both for the proof of statistical results and to gain deeper understanding of models used for contingency table representation. For example, see (Fienberg 1970) for the convergence of iterative proportional fitting procedure, (Diaconis 1977) for the geometric representation of exchangeability, and (Kenett 1983) for uses in exploratory data analysis.

AB - Contingency tables represent the joint distribution of categorical variables. In this chapter we use modern algebraic geometry to update the geometric representation of 2 × 2 contingency tables first explored in (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970). Then we use this geometry for a series of new ends including various characterizations of the joint distribution in terms of combinations of margins, conditionals, and odds ratios. We also consider incomplete characterisations of the joint distribution and the link to latent class models and to the phenomenon known as Simpson’s paradox. Many of the ideas explored here generalise rather naturally to I × J and higher-way tables. We end with a brief discussion of generalisations and open problems.Introduction (Pearson 1956) in his presidential address to the Royal Statistical Society was one of the earliest statistical authors towrite explicitly about the role of geometric thinking for the theory of statistics, although many authors previously, such as (Edgeworth 1914) and (Fisher 1921), had relied heuristically upon geometric characterisations. For contingency tables, beginning with (Fienberg 1968) and (Fienberg and Gilbert 1970), several authors have exploited the geometric representation of contingency table models, in terms of quantities such as margins and odds ratios, both for the proof of statistical results and to gain deeper understanding of models used for contingency table representation. For example, see (Fienberg 1970) for the convergence of iterative proportional fitting procedure, (Diaconis 1977) for the geometric representation of exchangeability, and (Kenett 1983) for uses in exploratory data analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870216018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870216018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84870216018

SN - 9780521896191

SP - 63

EP - 82

BT - Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Slavkovic AB, Fienberg SE. Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables. In Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 63-82 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004