All That Glitters Is Not Gold

The Penalty Effect of Conspicuous Consumption in Services and How It Changes With Customers and Contexts

Martin Mende, Maura L. Scott, Lisa Elizabeth Bolton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A service provider’s conspicuous consumption can undermine customer attitudes and behavioral intentions toward the provider—a so-called penalty effect of conspicuous consumption. Four studies investigate customer and contextual factors that moderate this penalty effect. The results show that customers low in materialism penalize service providers who consume conspicuously (e.g., decreased patronage intentions). In addition, as another facet of the penalty effect, a service provider’s conspicuous consumption undermines customer cost-benefit assessments (decreased perceived value and price fairness), which function as mediating variables. However, service providers can use “service warmth” as a protective strategy to attenuate the penalty effect. Notably, materialistic customers do not react more favorably to service providers who engage in conspicuous consumption (in contrast with their established tendency to favor conspicuous goods). Taken together, the results provide a deeper and theoretically nuanced understanding of when and how customers respond negatively to conspicuous service providers, with meaningful implications for the management of services. For example, when service firms design their aesthetic labor strategy, they should consider their customers’ levels of materialism accordingly. In addition, service firms need to educate their frontline employees about the potential downsides of displaying conspicuous consumption cues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-420
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Service Research
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

gold
penalty
customer
service provider
Gold
Personnel
materialism
Costs
firm
clientelism
Penalty
Service provider
Conspicuous consumption
fairness
aesthetics
employee
labor
costs
management
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{c811eaf4e9514839a1712a1a2c10ee48,
title = "All That Glitters Is Not Gold: The Penalty Effect of Conspicuous Consumption in Services and How It Changes With Customers and Contexts",
abstract = "A service provider’s conspicuous consumption can undermine customer attitudes and behavioral intentions toward the provider—a so-called penalty effect of conspicuous consumption. Four studies investigate customer and contextual factors that moderate this penalty effect. The results show that customers low in materialism penalize service providers who consume conspicuously (e.g., decreased patronage intentions). In addition, as another facet of the penalty effect, a service provider’s conspicuous consumption undermines customer cost-benefit assessments (decreased perceived value and price fairness), which function as mediating variables. However, service providers can use “service warmth” as a protective strategy to attenuate the penalty effect. Notably, materialistic customers do not react more favorably to service providers who engage in conspicuous consumption (in contrast with their established tendency to favor conspicuous goods). Taken together, the results provide a deeper and theoretically nuanced understanding of when and how customers respond negatively to conspicuous service providers, with meaningful implications for the management of services. For example, when service firms design their aesthetic labor strategy, they should consider their customers’ levels of materialism accordingly. In addition, service firms need to educate their frontline employees about the potential downsides of displaying conspicuous consumption cues.",
author = "Martin Mende and Scott, {Maura L.} and Bolton, {Lisa Elizabeth}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1094670518770038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "405--420",
journal = "Journal of Service Research",
issn = "1094-6705",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

All That Glitters Is Not Gold : The Penalty Effect of Conspicuous Consumption in Services and How It Changes With Customers and Contexts. / Mende, Martin; Scott, Maura L.; Bolton, Lisa Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.11.2018, p. 405-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - All That Glitters Is Not Gold

T2 - The Penalty Effect of Conspicuous Consumption in Services and How It Changes With Customers and Contexts

AU - Mende, Martin

AU - Scott, Maura L.

AU - Bolton, Lisa Elizabeth

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - A service provider’s conspicuous consumption can undermine customer attitudes and behavioral intentions toward the provider—a so-called penalty effect of conspicuous consumption. Four studies investigate customer and contextual factors that moderate this penalty effect. The results show that customers low in materialism penalize service providers who consume conspicuously (e.g., decreased patronage intentions). In addition, as another facet of the penalty effect, a service provider’s conspicuous consumption undermines customer cost-benefit assessments (decreased perceived value and price fairness), which function as mediating variables. However, service providers can use “service warmth” as a protective strategy to attenuate the penalty effect. Notably, materialistic customers do not react more favorably to service providers who engage in conspicuous consumption (in contrast with their established tendency to favor conspicuous goods). Taken together, the results provide a deeper and theoretically nuanced understanding of when and how customers respond negatively to conspicuous service providers, with meaningful implications for the management of services. For example, when service firms design their aesthetic labor strategy, they should consider their customers’ levels of materialism accordingly. In addition, service firms need to educate their frontline employees about the potential downsides of displaying conspicuous consumption cues.

AB - A service provider’s conspicuous consumption can undermine customer attitudes and behavioral intentions toward the provider—a so-called penalty effect of conspicuous consumption. Four studies investigate customer and contextual factors that moderate this penalty effect. The results show that customers low in materialism penalize service providers who consume conspicuously (e.g., decreased patronage intentions). In addition, as another facet of the penalty effect, a service provider’s conspicuous consumption undermines customer cost-benefit assessments (decreased perceived value and price fairness), which function as mediating variables. However, service providers can use “service warmth” as a protective strategy to attenuate the penalty effect. Notably, materialistic customers do not react more favorably to service providers who engage in conspicuous consumption (in contrast with their established tendency to favor conspicuous goods). Taken together, the results provide a deeper and theoretically nuanced understanding of when and how customers respond negatively to conspicuous service providers, with meaningful implications for the management of services. For example, when service firms design their aesthetic labor strategy, they should consider their customers’ levels of materialism accordingly. In addition, service firms need to educate their frontline employees about the potential downsides of displaying conspicuous consumption cues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045844068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045844068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1094670518770038

DO - 10.1177/1094670518770038

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 405

EP - 420

JO - Journal of Service Research

JF - Journal of Service Research

SN - 1094-6705

IS - 4

ER -