Allowing repeat winners

Marco D. Huesch, Richard Brady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. As in design questions surrounding single-shot lotteries, considerations of self-interest and distributive social preferences may interact. We investigate preferences for allowing participation of earlier winners in sequential lotteries. We found a strong preference for exclusion, both in settings where subjects were involved, and those where they were not. Subjects who answered questions about both settings did not differ in their tendency to prefer exclusion. Stated rationales significantly predicted choice but did not predict switching of choices between the two settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)374-379
Number of pages6
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume5
Issue number5
StatePublished - Aug 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Allowing repeat winners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Huesch, M. D., & Brady, R. (2010). Allowing repeat winners. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 374-379.