Alternative feeding strategies and genetics for providing adequate methionine in organic poultry diets with limited use of synthetic amino acids

H. K. Burley, Paul H. Patterson, K. E. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Currently, synthetic methionine (Met) use in organic poultry diets in the United States is limited to 1, 1, and 1.5 kg per metric tonne of feed for laying hens, broilers, and turkeys and other poultry, respectively. This limitation, and the push to ban the use of synthetic Met entirely, makes it challenging to formulate diets to meet the requirements of these birds. Methionine levels can be maintained in organic poultry diets without synthetics by dramatic increases in dietary crude protein; however, the ramifications of such high crude protein intake are major increases in feed cost and environmental concerns due to increased nitrogen excretion, rises in ammonia emissions, and subsequent welfare issues. This review examines alternative bird genetics and feeding strategies that have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for synthetic Met in organic poultry diets. Alterative 'heritage' breeds may have lower Met needs as a percentage of the total diet; however, these birds have substantially slower growth and are less productive compared to typical commercial breeds. Feeding strategies that have been examined to reduce Met inclusion in the diet, such as allowing birds to forage, providing low Met density diets to encourage increased feed intake and subsequently make up for the Met deficiency, allowing birds to self select between energy-rich ingredients and protein concentrates to meet their Met needs by instinct, or supplementing methyl donors (betaine or choline) or inorganic sulphate, have been shown to make up for marginal Met deficiencies in some instances. However, there is no one solution to this issue that has been found thus far. A combination of genetics, feeding strategies, and alternative ingredients may provide the most favourable solution in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-177
Number of pages10
JournalWorld's Poultry Science Journal
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

feeding methods
methionine
poultry
amino acids
diet
birds
ingredients
crude protein
breeds
protein concentrates
betaine
choline
artificial diets
protein intake
laying hens
sulfates
ammonia
feed intake
excretion
broiler chickens

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

@article{025f6ccdf21c401eb96181bd4acfb8b2,
title = "Alternative feeding strategies and genetics for providing adequate methionine in organic poultry diets with limited use of synthetic amino acids",
abstract = "Currently, synthetic methionine (Met) use in organic poultry diets in the United States is limited to 1, 1, and 1.5 kg per metric tonne of feed for laying hens, broilers, and turkeys and other poultry, respectively. This limitation, and the push to ban the use of synthetic Met entirely, makes it challenging to formulate diets to meet the requirements of these birds. Methionine levels can be maintained in organic poultry diets without synthetics by dramatic increases in dietary crude protein; however, the ramifications of such high crude protein intake are major increases in feed cost and environmental concerns due to increased nitrogen excretion, rises in ammonia emissions, and subsequent welfare issues. This review examines alternative bird genetics and feeding strategies that have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for synthetic Met in organic poultry diets. Alterative 'heritage' breeds may have lower Met needs as a percentage of the total diet; however, these birds have substantially slower growth and are less productive compared to typical commercial breeds. Feeding strategies that have been examined to reduce Met inclusion in the diet, such as allowing birds to forage, providing low Met density diets to encourage increased feed intake and subsequently make up for the Met deficiency, allowing birds to self select between energy-rich ingredients and protein concentrates to meet their Met needs by instinct, or supplementing methyl donors (betaine or choline) or inorganic sulphate, have been shown to make up for marginal Met deficiencies in some instances. However, there is no one solution to this issue that has been found thus far. A combination of genetics, feeding strategies, and alternative ingredients may provide the most favourable solution in the future.",
author = "Burley, {H. K.} and Patterson, {Paul H.} and Anderson, {K. E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0043933915002688",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "168--177",
journal = "World's Poultry Science Journal",
issn = "0043-9339",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Alternative feeding strategies and genetics for providing adequate methionine in organic poultry diets with limited use of synthetic amino acids. / Burley, H. K.; Patterson, Paul H.; Anderson, K. E.

In: World's Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 168-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative feeding strategies and genetics for providing adequate methionine in organic poultry diets with limited use of synthetic amino acids

AU - Burley, H. K.

AU - Patterson, Paul H.

AU - Anderson, K. E.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Currently, synthetic methionine (Met) use in organic poultry diets in the United States is limited to 1, 1, and 1.5 kg per metric tonne of feed for laying hens, broilers, and turkeys and other poultry, respectively. This limitation, and the push to ban the use of synthetic Met entirely, makes it challenging to formulate diets to meet the requirements of these birds. Methionine levels can be maintained in organic poultry diets without synthetics by dramatic increases in dietary crude protein; however, the ramifications of such high crude protein intake are major increases in feed cost and environmental concerns due to increased nitrogen excretion, rises in ammonia emissions, and subsequent welfare issues. This review examines alternative bird genetics and feeding strategies that have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for synthetic Met in organic poultry diets. Alterative 'heritage' breeds may have lower Met needs as a percentage of the total diet; however, these birds have substantially slower growth and are less productive compared to typical commercial breeds. Feeding strategies that have been examined to reduce Met inclusion in the diet, such as allowing birds to forage, providing low Met density diets to encourage increased feed intake and subsequently make up for the Met deficiency, allowing birds to self select between energy-rich ingredients and protein concentrates to meet their Met needs by instinct, or supplementing methyl donors (betaine or choline) or inorganic sulphate, have been shown to make up for marginal Met deficiencies in some instances. However, there is no one solution to this issue that has been found thus far. A combination of genetics, feeding strategies, and alternative ingredients may provide the most favourable solution in the future.

AB - Currently, synthetic methionine (Met) use in organic poultry diets in the United States is limited to 1, 1, and 1.5 kg per metric tonne of feed for laying hens, broilers, and turkeys and other poultry, respectively. This limitation, and the push to ban the use of synthetic Met entirely, makes it challenging to formulate diets to meet the requirements of these birds. Methionine levels can be maintained in organic poultry diets without synthetics by dramatic increases in dietary crude protein; however, the ramifications of such high crude protein intake are major increases in feed cost and environmental concerns due to increased nitrogen excretion, rises in ammonia emissions, and subsequent welfare issues. This review examines alternative bird genetics and feeding strategies that have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for synthetic Met in organic poultry diets. Alterative 'heritage' breeds may have lower Met needs as a percentage of the total diet; however, these birds have substantially slower growth and are less productive compared to typical commercial breeds. Feeding strategies that have been examined to reduce Met inclusion in the diet, such as allowing birds to forage, providing low Met density diets to encourage increased feed intake and subsequently make up for the Met deficiency, allowing birds to self select between energy-rich ingredients and protein concentrates to meet their Met needs by instinct, or supplementing methyl donors (betaine or choline) or inorganic sulphate, have been shown to make up for marginal Met deficiencies in some instances. However, there is no one solution to this issue that has been found thus far. A combination of genetics, feeding strategies, and alternative ingredients may provide the most favourable solution in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955308385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955308385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0043933915002688

DO - 10.1017/S0043933915002688

M3 - Review article

VL - 72

SP - 168

EP - 177

JO - World's Poultry Science Journal

JF - World's Poultry Science Journal

SN - 0043-9339

IS - 1

ER -