TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternatives to Agrilogistics
T2 - Designing for Ecological Thinking
AU - Biggs, Heidi
AU - Joshi, Tejaswini
AU - Murphy, Ries
AU - Bardzell, Jeffrey
AU - Bardzell, Shaowen
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the associate chairs and anonymous reviewers for their insightful feedback suggestions. We are grateful for the support of our interlocutors. This work is supported by National Science Foundation, under grants #1908135 and #1900722.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 ACM.
PY - 2021/10/18
Y1 - 2021/10/18
N2 - Sustainable HCI (SHCI) researchers have historically looked to small and urban farmers to help situate and extend notions of sustainability within economic, social, and political frameworks. In the face of climate change and the Anthropocene, however, we ask how designing like the alternative farming practices of small and urban farmers might open up new, ecological approaches to agricultural technology. We conducted ethnographic field work with small farmers and their community in Indiana and show how they are challenging "agrilogistics,"defined by philosopher Timothy Morton as a strict separation of nature and culture in food production, a separation, he argues, which underlies the substantial agricultural contributions to climate change. Our ethnography led us to suggest new possibilities for design of agricultural technology that support ecological thinking and caring for more-than-human actors through visceral imaginaries, posthuman storytelling, and engaging curiosity, possibilities which may offer ways to disentangle agricultural technology from agrilogistic paradigms.?
AB - Sustainable HCI (SHCI) researchers have historically looked to small and urban farmers to help situate and extend notions of sustainability within economic, social, and political frameworks. In the face of climate change and the Anthropocene, however, we ask how designing like the alternative farming practices of small and urban farmers might open up new, ecological approaches to agricultural technology. We conducted ethnographic field work with small farmers and their community in Indiana and show how they are challenging "agrilogistics,"defined by philosopher Timothy Morton as a strict separation of nature and culture in food production, a separation, he argues, which underlies the substantial agricultural contributions to climate change. Our ethnography led us to suggest new possibilities for design of agricultural technology that support ecological thinking and caring for more-than-human actors through visceral imaginaries, posthuman storytelling, and engaging curiosity, possibilities which may offer ways to disentangle agricultural technology from agrilogistic paradigms.?
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117909147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117909147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3479557
DO - 10.1145/3479557
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117909147
SN - 2573-0142
VL - 5
JO - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
JF - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
IS - CSCW2
M1 - 413
ER -