TY - GEN
T1 - Ambiguous accountability
T2 - 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2017
AU - Murphy, Alison R.
AU - Reddy, Madhu C.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the hospital staff for their willingness to participate in this study. This research was supported in part by a grant from the NSF (IIS 0844947).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 ACM.
PY - 2017/2/25
Y1 - 2017/2/25
N2 - Collaborative patient-care teams rely on accurate and complete information in order to make informed decisions about their patients. However, patient-related information problems (PIPs) are a common occurrence in hospital work. These PIPs are any issues related to patient information that impact the patient-care team's ability to perform their work (e.g., wrong, missing, outdated information). To better understand the challenges that patient-care teams face in identifying and collaboratively managing PIPs related to the use of the electronic health record (EHR), we conducted a qualitative study of patient-care teams during morning rounds. In this paper, we describe the types of PIPs that the team members encountered and how they identified who was accountable for fixing the PIP. Through our analysis, we highlight the challenges that arise when team members have an unclear or conflicting assumption about who is responsible for fixing the PIP. We conclude with a discussion on improving organizational policies and EHR design in order to help reduce ambiguous accountability for the management of PIPs within collaborative teams.
AB - Collaborative patient-care teams rely on accurate and complete information in order to make informed decisions about their patients. However, patient-related information problems (PIPs) are a common occurrence in hospital work. These PIPs are any issues related to patient information that impact the patient-care team's ability to perform their work (e.g., wrong, missing, outdated information). To better understand the challenges that patient-care teams face in identifying and collaboratively managing PIPs related to the use of the electronic health record (EHR), we conducted a qualitative study of patient-care teams during morning rounds. In this paper, we describe the types of PIPs that the team members encountered and how they identified who was accountable for fixing the PIP. Through our analysis, we highlight the challenges that arise when team members have an unclear or conflicting assumption about who is responsible for fixing the PIP. We conclude with a discussion on improving organizational policies and EHR design in order to help reduce ambiguous accountability for the management of PIPs within collaborative teams.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014740921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014740921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2998181.2998315
DO - 10.1145/2998181.2998315
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85014740921
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW
SP - 1646
EP - 1660
BT - CSCW 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
Y2 - 25 February 2017 through 1 March 2017
ER -