An Alternate Method of Range of Motion Measurement

Semyon M. Slobounov, Robert F. Simon, Jill A. Bush, William J. Kraemer, Wayne Sebastianelli, E. Slobounova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The goniometer is certainly the most popular instrument to use for measuring joint range of motion in a clinical setting. However, this method of measurement does have its limitations, namely, problems with intertester reliability and with the fact that the device does not provide an accurate measure of inherent movement variability. Modern motion tracking devices such as the Flock of Birds can eliminate such problems. A simple experiment comparing the 2 measurement devices was performed, in which subjects, with their eyes closed, executed knee extensions (trying to match a passive measurement) of 45° and 60°. A statistically significant difference between the Flock and the goniometer was observed in the passive measurements of the 45° movement, possibly indicating the superiority of the modern device for quantifying movement variability. This finding may have practical clinical implications for determining recovery from a joint injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-393
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1999

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Equipment and Supplies
Birds
Knee
Joints
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Slobounov, Semyon M. ; Simon, Robert F. ; Bush, Jill A. ; Kraemer, William J. ; Sebastianelli, Wayne ; Slobounova, E. / An Alternate Method of Range of Motion Measurement. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 1999 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 389-393.
@article{d267eef7a27a4cefbbece7508bf6dbbc,
title = "An Alternate Method of Range of Motion Measurement",
abstract = "The goniometer is certainly the most popular instrument to use for measuring joint range of motion in a clinical setting. However, this method of measurement does have its limitations, namely, problems with intertester reliability and with the fact that the device does not provide an accurate measure of inherent movement variability. Modern motion tracking devices such as the Flock of Birds can eliminate such problems. A simple experiment comparing the 2 measurement devices was performed, in which subjects, with their eyes closed, executed knee extensions (trying to match a passive measurement) of 45° and 60°. A statistically significant difference between the Flock and the goniometer was observed in the passive measurements of the 45° movement, possibly indicating the superiority of the modern device for quantifying movement variability. This finding may have practical clinical implications for determining recovery from a joint injury.",
author = "Slobounov, {Semyon M.} and Simon, {Robert F.} and Bush, {Jill A.} and Kraemer, {William J.} and Wayne Sebastianelli and E. Slobounova",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/1533-4287(1999)013<0389:AAMORO>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "389--393",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "4",

}

An Alternate Method of Range of Motion Measurement. / Slobounov, Semyon M.; Simon, Robert F.; Bush, Jill A.; Kraemer, William J.; Sebastianelli, Wayne; Slobounova, E.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.11.1999, p. 389-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Alternate Method of Range of Motion Measurement

AU - Slobounov, Semyon M.

AU - Simon, Robert F.

AU - Bush, Jill A.

AU - Kraemer, William J.

AU - Sebastianelli, Wayne

AU - Slobounova, E.

PY - 1999/11/1

Y1 - 1999/11/1

N2 - The goniometer is certainly the most popular instrument to use for measuring joint range of motion in a clinical setting. However, this method of measurement does have its limitations, namely, problems with intertester reliability and with the fact that the device does not provide an accurate measure of inherent movement variability. Modern motion tracking devices such as the Flock of Birds can eliminate such problems. A simple experiment comparing the 2 measurement devices was performed, in which subjects, with their eyes closed, executed knee extensions (trying to match a passive measurement) of 45° and 60°. A statistically significant difference between the Flock and the goniometer was observed in the passive measurements of the 45° movement, possibly indicating the superiority of the modern device for quantifying movement variability. This finding may have practical clinical implications for determining recovery from a joint injury.

AB - The goniometer is certainly the most popular instrument to use for measuring joint range of motion in a clinical setting. However, this method of measurement does have its limitations, namely, problems with intertester reliability and with the fact that the device does not provide an accurate measure of inherent movement variability. Modern motion tracking devices such as the Flock of Birds can eliminate such problems. A simple experiment comparing the 2 measurement devices was performed, in which subjects, with their eyes closed, executed knee extensions (trying to match a passive measurement) of 45° and 60°. A statistically significant difference between the Flock and the goniometer was observed in the passive measurements of the 45° movement, possibly indicating the superiority of the modern device for quantifying movement variability. This finding may have practical clinical implications for determining recovery from a joint injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347651026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347651026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/1533-4287(1999)013<0389:AAMORO>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1519/1533-4287(1999)013<0389:AAMORO>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347651026

VL - 13

SP - 389

EP - 393

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 4

ER -