An empirical analysis of the financial impact of quick response

Terence Brown, Thomas Edward Buttross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This research aims to measure the financial and operating impact for US retailers that adopted quick response (QR). It specifically looks at the impact of QR on profitability, cost efficiency, and inventory management. Design/methodology/approach - The research analyzed data from the CRSP/Compustat data base of US publicly held corporations to compare adopters of QR with non-adopters before and after adoption. Findings - The results indicated that adopters of QR did not benefit as expected. Adopters, on average, did not improve their performance to a statistically significant degree with respect to profitability, cost efficiency, or inventory levels. Research limitations/implications - The main limitations of the research include the fairly small number of firms studied (11 adopters and 16 non-adopters) and the lack of evidence identifying the reasons for the adopters poor performance. Another limitation is the fact that only the manufacturers perceptions have been considered. It would be beneficial in future research to consider the opinion of retailers about their own management of these brands. Originality/value - The research uses objective actual financial results before and after adoption of QR and avoids the practice of using subjective management opinions of success. The research design includes before and after analysis with a control group - the strongest design possible given the inability to randomly assign firms to the adopter and non-adopter categories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-626
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 14 2008

Fingerprint

Quick response
Empirical analysis
Retailers
Profitability
Inventory management
Research design
Financial result
Design methodology
Data base

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{b6b4845b4ed3426a84953c7f15e26cb3,
title = "An empirical analysis of the financial impact of quick response",
abstract = "Purpose - This research aims to measure the financial and operating impact for US retailers that adopted quick response (QR). It specifically looks at the impact of QR on profitability, cost efficiency, and inventory management. Design/methodology/approach - The research analyzed data from the CRSP/Compustat data base of US publicly held corporations to compare adopters of QR with non-adopters before and after adoption. Findings - The results indicated that adopters of QR did not benefit as expected. Adopters, on average, did not improve their performance to a statistically significant degree with respect to profitability, cost efficiency, or inventory levels. Research limitations/implications - The main limitations of the research include the fairly small number of firms studied (11 adopters and 16 non-adopters) and the lack of evidence identifying the reasons for the adopters poor performance. Another limitation is the fact that only the manufacturers perceptions have been considered. It would be beneficial in future research to consider the opinion of retailers about their own management of these brands. Originality/value - The research uses objective actual financial results before and after adoption of QR and avoids the practice of using subjective management opinions of success. The research design includes before and after analysis with a control group - the strongest design possible given the inability to randomly assign firms to the adopter and non-adopter categories.",
author = "Terence Brown and Buttross, {Thomas Edward}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1108/09590550810883469",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "607--626",
journal = "International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management",
issn = "0959-0552",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

An empirical analysis of the financial impact of quick response. / Brown, Terence; Buttross, Thomas Edward.

In: International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 36, No. 8, 14.07.2008, p. 607-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical analysis of the financial impact of quick response

AU - Brown, Terence

AU - Buttross, Thomas Edward

PY - 2008/7/14

Y1 - 2008/7/14

N2 - Purpose - This research aims to measure the financial and operating impact for US retailers that adopted quick response (QR). It specifically looks at the impact of QR on profitability, cost efficiency, and inventory management. Design/methodology/approach - The research analyzed data from the CRSP/Compustat data base of US publicly held corporations to compare adopters of QR with non-adopters before and after adoption. Findings - The results indicated that adopters of QR did not benefit as expected. Adopters, on average, did not improve their performance to a statistically significant degree with respect to profitability, cost efficiency, or inventory levels. Research limitations/implications - The main limitations of the research include the fairly small number of firms studied (11 adopters and 16 non-adopters) and the lack of evidence identifying the reasons for the adopters poor performance. Another limitation is the fact that only the manufacturers perceptions have been considered. It would be beneficial in future research to consider the opinion of retailers about their own management of these brands. Originality/value - The research uses objective actual financial results before and after adoption of QR and avoids the practice of using subjective management opinions of success. The research design includes before and after analysis with a control group - the strongest design possible given the inability to randomly assign firms to the adopter and non-adopter categories.

AB - Purpose - This research aims to measure the financial and operating impact for US retailers that adopted quick response (QR). It specifically looks at the impact of QR on profitability, cost efficiency, and inventory management. Design/methodology/approach - The research analyzed data from the CRSP/Compustat data base of US publicly held corporations to compare adopters of QR with non-adopters before and after adoption. Findings - The results indicated that adopters of QR did not benefit as expected. Adopters, on average, did not improve their performance to a statistically significant degree with respect to profitability, cost efficiency, or inventory levels. Research limitations/implications - The main limitations of the research include the fairly small number of firms studied (11 adopters and 16 non-adopters) and the lack of evidence identifying the reasons for the adopters poor performance. Another limitation is the fact that only the manufacturers perceptions have been considered. It would be beneficial in future research to consider the opinion of retailers about their own management of these brands. Originality/value - The research uses objective actual financial results before and after adoption of QR and avoids the practice of using subjective management opinions of success. The research design includes before and after analysis with a control group - the strongest design possible given the inability to randomly assign firms to the adopter and non-adopter categories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46749089253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46749089253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09590550810883469

DO - 10.1108/09590550810883469

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 607

EP - 626

JO - International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management

JF - International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management

SN - 0959-0552

IS - 8

ER -