An empirical assessment of employee theft lawsuits involving allegations of employer misconduct

Shaun L. Gabbidon, Patricia A. Patrick, Steven Ames Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explored state-level cases where employees sued their employers because of allegations of misconduct. Using the Lexis-Nexis legal database, employee theft cases from 1960-2004 were located and analyzed (n = 217). The descriptive analyses revealed that most of the cases originated from private corporations. While there were a variety of reasons why employees pursued lawsuits against their employers, the most frequent were to appeal a conviction, to allege slander or defamation, wrongful termination, malicious prosecution, Constitutional violations, and other unemployment-related issues. The employees were victorious in 60 percent of the cases. The research also revealed several patterns in case outcomes based on employee position and gender. Multivariate analyses revealed some of the most significant predictors of employee success in legal suits against their employers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-183
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Fingerprint

Theft
lawsuit
larceny
employer
employee
Unemployment
Multivariate Analysis
Databases
Research
prosecution
Defamation
unemployment
corporation
appeal
gender

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Gabbidon, Shaun L. ; Patrick, Patricia A. ; Peterson, Steven Ames. / An empirical assessment of employee theft lawsuits involving allegations of employer misconduct. In: Journal of Criminal Justice. 2006 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 175-183.
@article{6b1f276591ab472ba051edcce3447215,
title = "An empirical assessment of employee theft lawsuits involving allegations of employer misconduct",
abstract = "This study explored state-level cases where employees sued their employers because of allegations of misconduct. Using the Lexis-Nexis legal database, employee theft cases from 1960-2004 were located and analyzed (n = 217). The descriptive analyses revealed that most of the cases originated from private corporations. While there were a variety of reasons why employees pursued lawsuits against their employers, the most frequent were to appeal a conviction, to allege slander or defamation, wrongful termination, malicious prosecution, Constitutional violations, and other unemployment-related issues. The employees were victorious in 60 percent of the cases. The research also revealed several patterns in case outcomes based on employee position and gender. Multivariate analyses revealed some of the most significant predictors of employee success in legal suits against their employers.",
author = "Gabbidon, {Shaun L.} and Patrick, {Patricia A.} and Peterson, {Steven Ames}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "175--183",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

An empirical assessment of employee theft lawsuits involving allegations of employer misconduct. / Gabbidon, Shaun L.; Patrick, Patricia A.; Peterson, Steven Ames.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 34, No. 2, 01.03.2006, p. 175-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical assessment of employee theft lawsuits involving allegations of employer misconduct

AU - Gabbidon, Shaun L.

AU - Patrick, Patricia A.

AU - Peterson, Steven Ames

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - This study explored state-level cases where employees sued their employers because of allegations of misconduct. Using the Lexis-Nexis legal database, employee theft cases from 1960-2004 were located and analyzed (n = 217). The descriptive analyses revealed that most of the cases originated from private corporations. While there were a variety of reasons why employees pursued lawsuits against their employers, the most frequent were to appeal a conviction, to allege slander or defamation, wrongful termination, malicious prosecution, Constitutional violations, and other unemployment-related issues. The employees were victorious in 60 percent of the cases. The research also revealed several patterns in case outcomes based on employee position and gender. Multivariate analyses revealed some of the most significant predictors of employee success in legal suits against their employers.

AB - This study explored state-level cases where employees sued their employers because of allegations of misconduct. Using the Lexis-Nexis legal database, employee theft cases from 1960-2004 were located and analyzed (n = 217). The descriptive analyses revealed that most of the cases originated from private corporations. While there were a variety of reasons why employees pursued lawsuits against their employers, the most frequent were to appeal a conviction, to allege slander or defamation, wrongful termination, malicious prosecution, Constitutional violations, and other unemployment-related issues. The employees were victorious in 60 percent of the cases. The research also revealed several patterns in case outcomes based on employee position and gender. Multivariate analyses revealed some of the most significant predictors of employee success in legal suits against their employers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645890299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645890299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 175

EP - 183

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 2

ER -