An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills

Catherine T. Goffreda, James Clyde Diperna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) are brief measures of early literacy skills for students in Grades K-6 (University of Oregon, 2009; see Kaminski Good, 1996). School psychologists and other educational professionals use DIBELS to identify students who are in need of early intervention. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the current psychometric evidence for each DIBELS indicator. Strong reliability and validity evidence was observed for DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency; however, evidence for the remaining DIBELS indicators demonstrated greater variability. Although the majority of evidence focused on individual score reliability and validity for single-point decisions, further studies are needed to determine effective practices for progress monitoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-483
Number of pages21
JournalSchool Psychology Review
Volume39
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
psychometrics
literacy
evidence
Reproducibility of Results
Students
school psychologist
Literacy
Reading
Psychology
student
monitoring

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{4ceedf2eaaca4e9da1ebb4adc3f254e9,
title = "An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills",
abstract = "The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) are brief measures of early literacy skills for students in Grades K-6 (University of Oregon, 2009; see Kaminski Good, 1996). School psychologists and other educational professionals use DIBELS to identify students who are in need of early intervention. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the current psychometric evidence for each DIBELS indicator. Strong reliability and validity evidence was observed for DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency; however, evidence for the remaining DIBELS indicators demonstrated greater variability. Although the majority of evidence focused on individual score reliability and validity for single-point decisions, further studies are needed to determine effective practices for progress monitoring.",
author = "Goffreda, {Catherine T.} and Diperna, {James Clyde}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "463--483",
journal = "School Psychology Review",
issn = "0279-6015",
publisher = "National Association of School Psychologists",
number = "3",

}

An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. / Goffreda, Catherine T.; Diperna, James Clyde.

In: School Psychology Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 463-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills

AU - Goffreda, Catherine T.

AU - Diperna, James Clyde

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) are brief measures of early literacy skills for students in Grades K-6 (University of Oregon, 2009; see Kaminski Good, 1996). School psychologists and other educational professionals use DIBELS to identify students who are in need of early intervention. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the current psychometric evidence for each DIBELS indicator. Strong reliability and validity evidence was observed for DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency; however, evidence for the remaining DIBELS indicators demonstrated greater variability. Although the majority of evidence focused on individual score reliability and validity for single-point decisions, further studies are needed to determine effective practices for progress monitoring.

AB - The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) are brief measures of early literacy skills for students in Grades K-6 (University of Oregon, 2009; see Kaminski Good, 1996). School psychologists and other educational professionals use DIBELS to identify students who are in need of early intervention. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the current psychometric evidence for each DIBELS indicator. Strong reliability and validity evidence was observed for DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency; however, evidence for the remaining DIBELS indicators demonstrated greater variability. Although the majority of evidence focused on individual score reliability and validity for single-point decisions, further studies are needed to determine effective practices for progress monitoring.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649276568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649276568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 463

EP - 483

JO - School Psychology Review

JF - School Psychology Review

SN - 0279-6015

IS - 3

ER -