An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass

Anne Henderson-Arzapalo, Paul Rago, Jorgen Skjeveland, Mike Mangold, Priscilla Washington, Jack Howe, Timothy Lee King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Six types of internal anchor tags were compared for retention, legibility, and durability in tagging juvenile (age-0) striped bass Morone saxatilis. Tank-reared striped bass (120–200 mm total length) were tagged with coded wire tags and one of six types of internal anchor tags (500 fish each tag type and two groups of controls). The types of internal anchor tags used were as follows: Floy streamer FM-84 (currently in use by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Floy streamer with protective sheath (modified FM-84), Floy streamer with a monofilament leader and sheath (FM-89SL), modified Hallprint T687, Hallprint monofilament IEX WAD, and Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR. The Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR and the Floy FM-84 tags caused significantly higher 2-week and 6-month mortality. Final fish total length was different among tag types and tagger groups; however, final fish size was not correlated with either variable after adjusting for initial fish size. Tags were also mounted on polyvinyl chloride pipes and exposed to freshwater, brackish-water, and saltwater environments for 1 year. The brackish-water environment was harsher than either freshwater or salt water and had a greater density of fouling organisms. Legibility was poor for the Floy streamer, and Floy tag sheaths sometimes moved and obscured the printing. Failure rates (printing loss or tag loss) for the Floy tags (36%) were about six times higher than the Hallprint tags (6%). An analysis of 369 anchor tags returned by striped bass fishers indicated that the tag was illegible when more than 43 printed characters were lost and that illegibility increased over time. None of the tags tested was considered appropriate for tagging juvenile striped bass, but changes in tag design, material, and insertion could improve tag retention and survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)482-493
Number of pages12
JournalNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Morone saxatilis
tagging
anchor
fish
brackish water
saline water
fouling organism
poly(vinyl chloride)
fouling
salt water
durability
pipes
wire
wildlife
pipe
evaluation
mortality
organisms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Henderson-Arzapalo, A., Rago, P., Skjeveland, J., Mangold, M., Washington, P., Howe, J., & King, T. L. (1999). An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 19(2), 482-493. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0482:AEOSIA>2.0.CO;2
Henderson-Arzapalo, Anne ; Rago, Paul ; Skjeveland, Jorgen ; Mangold, Mike ; Washington, Priscilla ; Howe, Jack ; King, Timothy Lee. / An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass. In: North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 1999 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 482-493.
@article{6c6c67df3f894d6ca96bfedd67a0dc45,
title = "An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass",
abstract = "Six types of internal anchor tags were compared for retention, legibility, and durability in tagging juvenile (age-0) striped bass Morone saxatilis. Tank-reared striped bass (120–200 mm total length) were tagged with coded wire tags and one of six types of internal anchor tags (500 fish each tag type and two groups of controls). The types of internal anchor tags used were as follows: Floy streamer FM-84 (currently in use by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Floy streamer with protective sheath (modified FM-84), Floy streamer with a monofilament leader and sheath (FM-89SL), modified Hallprint T687, Hallprint monofilament IEX WAD, and Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR. The Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR and the Floy FM-84 tags caused significantly higher 2-week and 6-month mortality. Final fish total length was different among tag types and tagger groups; however, final fish size was not correlated with either variable after adjusting for initial fish size. Tags were also mounted on polyvinyl chloride pipes and exposed to freshwater, brackish-water, and saltwater environments for 1 year. The brackish-water environment was harsher than either freshwater or salt water and had a greater density of fouling organisms. Legibility was poor for the Floy streamer, and Floy tag sheaths sometimes moved and obscured the printing. Failure rates (printing loss or tag loss) for the Floy tags (36{\%}) were about six times higher than the Hallprint tags (6{\%}). An analysis of 369 anchor tags returned by striped bass fishers indicated that the tag was illegible when more than 43 printed characters were lost and that illegibility increased over time. None of the tags tested was considered appropriate for tagging juvenile striped bass, but changes in tag design, material, and insertion could improve tag retention and survival.",
author = "Anne Henderson-Arzapalo and Paul Rago and Jorgen Skjeveland and Mike Mangold and Priscilla Washington and Jack Howe and King, {Timothy Lee}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0482:AEOSIA>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "482--493",
journal = "North American Journal of Fisheries Management",
issn = "0275-5947",
publisher = "American Fisheries Society",
number = "2",

}

Henderson-Arzapalo, A, Rago, P, Skjeveland, J, Mangold, M, Washington, P, Howe, J & King, TL 1999, 'An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass', North American Journal of Fisheries Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 482-493. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0482:AEOSIA>2.0.CO;2

An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass. / Henderson-Arzapalo, Anne; Rago, Paul; Skjeveland, Jorgen; Mangold, Mike; Washington, Priscilla; Howe, Jack; King, Timothy Lee.

In: North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.01.1999, p. 482-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of six internal anchor tags for tagging juvenile striped bass

AU - Henderson-Arzapalo, Anne

AU - Rago, Paul

AU - Skjeveland, Jorgen

AU - Mangold, Mike

AU - Washington, Priscilla

AU - Howe, Jack

AU - King, Timothy Lee

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Six types of internal anchor tags were compared for retention, legibility, and durability in tagging juvenile (age-0) striped bass Morone saxatilis. Tank-reared striped bass (120–200 mm total length) were tagged with coded wire tags and one of six types of internal anchor tags (500 fish each tag type and two groups of controls). The types of internal anchor tags used were as follows: Floy streamer FM-84 (currently in use by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Floy streamer with protective sheath (modified FM-84), Floy streamer with a monofilament leader and sheath (FM-89SL), modified Hallprint T687, Hallprint monofilament IEX WAD, and Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR. The Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR and the Floy FM-84 tags caused significantly higher 2-week and 6-month mortality. Final fish total length was different among tag types and tagger groups; however, final fish size was not correlated with either variable after adjusting for initial fish size. Tags were also mounted on polyvinyl chloride pipes and exposed to freshwater, brackish-water, and saltwater environments for 1 year. The brackish-water environment was harsher than either freshwater or salt water and had a greater density of fouling organisms. Legibility was poor for the Floy streamer, and Floy tag sheaths sometimes moved and obscured the printing. Failure rates (printing loss or tag loss) for the Floy tags (36%) were about six times higher than the Hallprint tags (6%). An analysis of 369 anchor tags returned by striped bass fishers indicated that the tag was illegible when more than 43 printed characters were lost and that illegibility increased over time. None of the tags tested was considered appropriate for tagging juvenile striped bass, but changes in tag design, material, and insertion could improve tag retention and survival.

AB - Six types of internal anchor tags were compared for retention, legibility, and durability in tagging juvenile (age-0) striped bass Morone saxatilis. Tank-reared striped bass (120–200 mm total length) were tagged with coded wire tags and one of six types of internal anchor tags (500 fish each tag type and two groups of controls). The types of internal anchor tags used were as follows: Floy streamer FM-84 (currently in use by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service); Floy streamer with protective sheath (modified FM-84), Floy streamer with a monofilament leader and sheath (FM-89SL), modified Hallprint T687, Hallprint monofilament IEX WAD, and Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR. The Hallprint T-bar IEX NOR and the Floy FM-84 tags caused significantly higher 2-week and 6-month mortality. Final fish total length was different among tag types and tagger groups; however, final fish size was not correlated with either variable after adjusting for initial fish size. Tags were also mounted on polyvinyl chloride pipes and exposed to freshwater, brackish-water, and saltwater environments for 1 year. The brackish-water environment was harsher than either freshwater or salt water and had a greater density of fouling organisms. Legibility was poor for the Floy streamer, and Floy tag sheaths sometimes moved and obscured the printing. Failure rates (printing loss or tag loss) for the Floy tags (36%) were about six times higher than the Hallprint tags (6%). An analysis of 369 anchor tags returned by striped bass fishers indicated that the tag was illegible when more than 43 printed characters were lost and that illegibility increased over time. None of the tags tested was considered appropriate for tagging juvenile striped bass, but changes in tag design, material, and insertion could improve tag retention and survival.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032816334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032816334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0482:AEOSIA>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0482:AEOSIA>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032816334

VL - 19

SP - 482

EP - 493

JO - North American Journal of Fisheries Management

JF - North American Journal of Fisheries Management

SN - 0275-5947

IS - 2

ER -