An Examination of Support (In)Adequacy: Types, Sources, and Consequences of Social Support among Infertile Women

Andrew C. High, Keli Ryan Steuber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigated gaps between the supportive communication people desire and receive in the context of infertility. Our findings advance the notion of support adequacy by positioning social support as a dynamic resource that is contributed to from a variety of sources in numerous ways. A community sample of 301 infertile women indicated that they experience discrepancies in the support they desire compared to what they receive from their spouses, friends and family, medical professionals, and online sources. Participants experienced the most discrepancies from medical professionals, and in almost all of these discrepancies people desired more support than they received. The magnitude of the gap between people's desires and what they receive corresponds with evaluations of support quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-178
Number of pages22
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An Examination of Support (In)Adequacy: Types, Sources, and Consequences of Social Support among Infertile Women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this