An experimental investigation of turbulent thermal convection in water-based alumina nanofluid

Rui Ni, Sheng Qi Zhou, Ke Qing Xia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report heat transfer and flow dynamics measurements of alumina nanofluid in turbulent convective flow. Under the condition of fixed temperature at the top plate and fixed input heat flux at the bottom plate, it has been found that the convective heat transfer coefficient, h, Nusselt number, Nu, and Rayleigh number, Ra, all decrease with the increasing volume fraction φ of the nanoparticle. In contrast, the velocity of the convective flow showed no significant change within experimental uncertainty and over the range of nanoparticle concentration of the measurement (from 0% to 1.08%). Under the condition of constant nanoparticle concentration (φ =1.08%), a second set of measurements of the heat transport and flow properties have been made over a broad range of Ra (from 2.6×108 to 7.7×109). For heat transport, a transition near Rac≠2.5×109 has been found. For Ra>Rac, the measured Nu of the nanofluid is roughly the same as that of water in terms of both its magnitude and its scaling relation with Ra, which suggests that the nanofluid can be treated as a single phase fluid in this parameter range. For Ra<Rac, Nu becomes smaller than that of the water and the deviation becomes larger with decreasing Ra. In the parameter range of Ra<Rac, the measured instantaneous Nu(t) shows strong and quasiperiodic fluctuations, which is absent when Ra>Rac. This suggests that the significant decrease of the nanofluid Nu comparing to that of water may be caused by the mass diffusion of nanoparticles. Furthermore, measurements of the flow velocity of the bulk nanofluid showed no significant difference from that of water for Ra either above or below Rac. From estimated thermal boundary layer thickness, we found that the deviations of the nanofluid Nu from that of water for Ra<Rac corresponds to the thickening of the thermal boundary layer at both the top and bottom plates. This thickening of the boundary layer at low input heat flux (or low driving strength of the convective flow) cannot be attributed to possible sedimentation of the nanoparticles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number022005
JournalPhysics of Fluids
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 18 2011

Fingerprint

free convection
aluminum oxides
convective flow
nanoparticles
thermal boundary layer
water
heat flux
heat
boundary layer thickness
convective heat transfer
Rayleigh number
Nusselt number
heat transfer coefficients
heat transmission
boundary layers
flow velocity
transport properties
heat transfer
deviation
scaling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

@article{f2fafcbd9c5543768b5f1aefa62a4169,
title = "An experimental investigation of turbulent thermal convection in water-based alumina nanofluid",
abstract = "We report heat transfer and flow dynamics measurements of alumina nanofluid in turbulent convective flow. Under the condition of fixed temperature at the top plate and fixed input heat flux at the bottom plate, it has been found that the convective heat transfer coefficient, h, Nusselt number, Nu, and Rayleigh number, Ra, all decrease with the increasing volume fraction φ of the nanoparticle. In contrast, the velocity of the convective flow showed no significant change within experimental uncertainty and over the range of nanoparticle concentration of the measurement (from 0{\%} to 1.08{\%}). Under the condition of constant nanoparticle concentration (φ =1.08{\%}), a second set of measurements of the heat transport and flow properties have been made over a broad range of Ra (from 2.6×108 to 7.7×109). For heat transport, a transition near Rac≠2.5×109 has been found. For Ra>Rac, the measured Nu of the nanofluid is roughly the same as that of water in terms of both its magnitude and its scaling relation with Ra, which suggests that the nanofluid can be treated as a single phase fluid in this parameter range. For Ra<Rac, Nu becomes smaller than that of the water and the deviation becomes larger with decreasing Ra. In the parameter range of Ra<Rac, the measured instantaneous Nu(t) shows strong and quasiperiodic fluctuations, which is absent when Ra>Rac. This suggests that the significant decrease of the nanofluid Nu comparing to that of water may be caused by the mass diffusion of nanoparticles. Furthermore, measurements of the flow velocity of the bulk nanofluid showed no significant difference from that of water for Ra either above or below Rac. From estimated thermal boundary layer thickness, we found that the deviations of the nanofluid Nu from that of water for Ra<Rac corresponds to the thickening of the thermal boundary layer at both the top and bottom plates. This thickening of the boundary layer at low input heat flux (or low driving strength of the convective flow) cannot be attributed to possible sedimentation of the nanoparticles.",
author = "Rui Ni and Zhou, {Sheng Qi} and Xia, {Ke Qing}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1063/1.3553281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
journal = "Physics of Fluids",
issn = "1070-6631",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "2",

}

An experimental investigation of turbulent thermal convection in water-based alumina nanofluid. / Ni, Rui; Zhou, Sheng Qi; Xia, Ke Qing.

In: Physics of Fluids, Vol. 23, No. 2, 022005, 18.02.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An experimental investigation of turbulent thermal convection in water-based alumina nanofluid

AU - Ni, Rui

AU - Zhou, Sheng Qi

AU - Xia, Ke Qing

PY - 2011/2/18

Y1 - 2011/2/18

N2 - We report heat transfer and flow dynamics measurements of alumina nanofluid in turbulent convective flow. Under the condition of fixed temperature at the top plate and fixed input heat flux at the bottom plate, it has been found that the convective heat transfer coefficient, h, Nusselt number, Nu, and Rayleigh number, Ra, all decrease with the increasing volume fraction φ of the nanoparticle. In contrast, the velocity of the convective flow showed no significant change within experimental uncertainty and over the range of nanoparticle concentration of the measurement (from 0% to 1.08%). Under the condition of constant nanoparticle concentration (φ =1.08%), a second set of measurements of the heat transport and flow properties have been made over a broad range of Ra (from 2.6×108 to 7.7×109). For heat transport, a transition near Rac≠2.5×109 has been found. For Ra>Rac, the measured Nu of the nanofluid is roughly the same as that of water in terms of both its magnitude and its scaling relation with Ra, which suggests that the nanofluid can be treated as a single phase fluid in this parameter range. For Ra<Rac, Nu becomes smaller than that of the water and the deviation becomes larger with decreasing Ra. In the parameter range of Ra<Rac, the measured instantaneous Nu(t) shows strong and quasiperiodic fluctuations, which is absent when Ra>Rac. This suggests that the significant decrease of the nanofluid Nu comparing to that of water may be caused by the mass diffusion of nanoparticles. Furthermore, measurements of the flow velocity of the bulk nanofluid showed no significant difference from that of water for Ra either above or below Rac. From estimated thermal boundary layer thickness, we found that the deviations of the nanofluid Nu from that of water for Ra<Rac corresponds to the thickening of the thermal boundary layer at both the top and bottom plates. This thickening of the boundary layer at low input heat flux (or low driving strength of the convective flow) cannot be attributed to possible sedimentation of the nanoparticles.

AB - We report heat transfer and flow dynamics measurements of alumina nanofluid in turbulent convective flow. Under the condition of fixed temperature at the top plate and fixed input heat flux at the bottom plate, it has been found that the convective heat transfer coefficient, h, Nusselt number, Nu, and Rayleigh number, Ra, all decrease with the increasing volume fraction φ of the nanoparticle. In contrast, the velocity of the convective flow showed no significant change within experimental uncertainty and over the range of nanoparticle concentration of the measurement (from 0% to 1.08%). Under the condition of constant nanoparticle concentration (φ =1.08%), a second set of measurements of the heat transport and flow properties have been made over a broad range of Ra (from 2.6×108 to 7.7×109). For heat transport, a transition near Rac≠2.5×109 has been found. For Ra>Rac, the measured Nu of the nanofluid is roughly the same as that of water in terms of both its magnitude and its scaling relation with Ra, which suggests that the nanofluid can be treated as a single phase fluid in this parameter range. For Ra<Rac, Nu becomes smaller than that of the water and the deviation becomes larger with decreasing Ra. In the parameter range of Ra<Rac, the measured instantaneous Nu(t) shows strong and quasiperiodic fluctuations, which is absent when Ra>Rac. This suggests that the significant decrease of the nanofluid Nu comparing to that of water may be caused by the mass diffusion of nanoparticles. Furthermore, measurements of the flow velocity of the bulk nanofluid showed no significant difference from that of water for Ra either above or below Rac. From estimated thermal boundary layer thickness, we found that the deviations of the nanofluid Nu from that of water for Ra<Rac corresponds to the thickening of the thermal boundary layer at both the top and bottom plates. This thickening of the boundary layer at low input heat flux (or low driving strength of the convective flow) cannot be attributed to possible sedimentation of the nanoparticles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952088299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952088299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.3553281

DO - 10.1063/1.3553281

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952088299

VL - 23

JO - Physics of Fluids

JF - Physics of Fluids

SN - 1070-6631

IS - 2

M1 - 022005

ER -