An international study of the response of corporate payout policy

Edward Hoang, Indrit Hoxha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study the payout policy for public firms in different countries. The authors are interested to understand the similarities and differences in the behavior of firms across different countries. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use firm-level data collected from Compustat Global for public firms across the world. The sample consists of more than 23,000 firms for the period 1990–2015 in 94 countries. The authors estimate the corporate payout in an empirical model that incorporates other corporate financing decisions, such as investment and debt policies. Findings: The findings support recent corporate governance theory, which asserts that payout policy is influenced by investment and debt policies, and cannot be determined independently. Furthermore, the authors find that geographic/cultural/institutional variation influence the response of payout policy to other corporate financing decisions. Additional tests are presented to demonstrate the robustness of the main findings. Research limitations/implications: The interpretation of the results for certain regions could be limited due to data availability. The authors believe the authors have a good coverage especially for countries in Asia, relative to the other regions. Originality/value: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to look at payout policy and its relationship with investment and debt policy in such a large scale of firms across the world with coverage of 94 countries and 16 years. The authors document differences in public firms’ attitudes toward payout policy according to geographic/cultural/institutional reasons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-349
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Managerial Finance
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 3 2019

Fingerprint

Payout policy
International studies
Investment policy
Debt policy
Public firm
Financing decisions
Firm-level data
Corporate governance
Robustness
Design methodology
Governance theory
Empirical model
Asia
Payout

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Finance

Cite this

@article{dff2f744af67427fbc6ea1a8e17411e4,
title = "An international study of the response of corporate payout policy",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study the payout policy for public firms in different countries. The authors are interested to understand the similarities and differences in the behavior of firms across different countries. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use firm-level data collected from Compustat Global for public firms across the world. The sample consists of more than 23,000 firms for the period 1990–2015 in 94 countries. The authors estimate the corporate payout in an empirical model that incorporates other corporate financing decisions, such as investment and debt policies. Findings: The findings support recent corporate governance theory, which asserts that payout policy is influenced by investment and debt policies, and cannot be determined independently. Furthermore, the authors find that geographic/cultural/institutional variation influence the response of payout policy to other corporate financing decisions. Additional tests are presented to demonstrate the robustness of the main findings. Research limitations/implications: The interpretation of the results for certain regions could be limited due to data availability. The authors believe the authors have a good coverage especially for countries in Asia, relative to the other regions. Originality/value: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to look at payout policy and its relationship with investment and debt policy in such a large scale of firms across the world with coverage of 94 countries and 16 years. The authors document differences in public firms’ attitudes toward payout policy according to geographic/cultural/institutional reasons.",
author = "Edward Hoang and Indrit Hoxha",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1108/IJMF-04-2018-0116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "335--349",
journal = "International Journal of Managerial Finance",
issn = "1743-9132",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

An international study of the response of corporate payout policy. / Hoang, Edward; Hoxha, Indrit.

In: International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 15, No. 3, 03.06.2019, p. 335-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An international study of the response of corporate payout policy

AU - Hoang, Edward

AU - Hoxha, Indrit

PY - 2019/6/3

Y1 - 2019/6/3

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study the payout policy for public firms in different countries. The authors are interested to understand the similarities and differences in the behavior of firms across different countries. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use firm-level data collected from Compustat Global for public firms across the world. The sample consists of more than 23,000 firms for the period 1990–2015 in 94 countries. The authors estimate the corporate payout in an empirical model that incorporates other corporate financing decisions, such as investment and debt policies. Findings: The findings support recent corporate governance theory, which asserts that payout policy is influenced by investment and debt policies, and cannot be determined independently. Furthermore, the authors find that geographic/cultural/institutional variation influence the response of payout policy to other corporate financing decisions. Additional tests are presented to demonstrate the robustness of the main findings. Research limitations/implications: The interpretation of the results for certain regions could be limited due to data availability. The authors believe the authors have a good coverage especially for countries in Asia, relative to the other regions. Originality/value: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to look at payout policy and its relationship with investment and debt policy in such a large scale of firms across the world with coverage of 94 countries and 16 years. The authors document differences in public firms’ attitudes toward payout policy according to geographic/cultural/institutional reasons.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study the payout policy for public firms in different countries. The authors are interested to understand the similarities and differences in the behavior of firms across different countries. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use firm-level data collected from Compustat Global for public firms across the world. The sample consists of more than 23,000 firms for the period 1990–2015 in 94 countries. The authors estimate the corporate payout in an empirical model that incorporates other corporate financing decisions, such as investment and debt policies. Findings: The findings support recent corporate governance theory, which asserts that payout policy is influenced by investment and debt policies, and cannot be determined independently. Furthermore, the authors find that geographic/cultural/institutional variation influence the response of payout policy to other corporate financing decisions. Additional tests are presented to demonstrate the robustness of the main findings. Research limitations/implications: The interpretation of the results for certain regions could be limited due to data availability. The authors believe the authors have a good coverage especially for countries in Asia, relative to the other regions. Originality/value: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to look at payout policy and its relationship with investment and debt policy in such a large scale of firms across the world with coverage of 94 countries and 16 years. The authors document differences in public firms’ attitudes toward payout policy according to geographic/cultural/institutional reasons.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065232763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065232763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJMF-04-2018-0116

DO - 10.1108/IJMF-04-2018-0116

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065232763

VL - 15

SP - 335

EP - 349

JO - International Journal of Managerial Finance

JF - International Journal of Managerial Finance

SN - 1743-9132

IS - 3

ER -