An Introduction to Mixed Methods Design in Program Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCounseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Program Evaluation
Organized Financing
Veterans
Counseling
Research Personnel
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{5d5ce58a8fff4880831dbdb9b2c14c3a,
title = "An Introduction to Mixed Methods Design in Program Evaluation",
abstract = "Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.",
author = "Elizabeth Prosek",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation",
issn = "2150-1378",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Introduction to Mixed Methods Design in Program Evaluation

AU - Prosek, Elizabeth

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.

AB - Counseling researchers possess a distinct skill set that lends itself to program evaluation of community-based treatment programs. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach to program evaluation could be beneficial to meet the outcome reporting requirements to satisfy grant sponsors, as well as provide stakeholders with information needed for program improvement. The purpose of this article is to provide an overall framework of program evaluation and application of mixed method design in evaluation. Additionally, the ethical and cultural considerations of program evaluation are presented. Finally, a case example of an evaluation with a veterans’ treatment court is used throughout, concluding with challenges that might be faced by program evaluators working in community partnerships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066990680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066990680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688

DO - 10.1080/21501378.2019.1590688

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066990680

JO - Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation

JF - Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation

SN - 2150-1378

ER -