Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains

Andrés F. Gonzalez Barrios, Moshe Herzberg, Jintae Lee, Thomas Keith Wood

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

To relate differences in motility to their effect on biofilm architecture, five Escherichia coli strains, K12 M1655, K12 ATCC 25404, K12 BW25113, JM109, and DH5□, were studied in a M9 minimal medium containing 0.4 wt % glucose and casamino acids with a continuous flow system by using confocal microscopy and the green fluorescence protein (GFP). The biofilm structures of each strain were quantified using image analysis software COMSTAT. Wild-type strains K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed scattered, branched macro colonies, and the COMSTAT parameters thickness, substratum coverage, and roughness coefficient corroborate the similarities between them (42 ± 14 □m vs. 44 ± 6 □m, 21 ± 8 % vs. 34 ± 13 %, and 0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09, respectively). E. coli JM109 displayed also scattered macrolonies but unlike K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, the macrocolony was smoother which was corroborated by the higher roughness coefficient (1.22 ± 0.13 for E. coli JM109). BW25113 was not able to develop a robust biofilm in this medium, and DH5□ appeared similar to JM109. These differences appear to be related to cell motility. Between the four strains, K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed the highest motility (K12 MG1655 is slightly more motile than K12 ATCC25404) as E. coli K12 MG1655 displayed a 6- and 8-fold increase in motility compared to E. coli JM109 and E. coli BW251123, respectively. The genetic basis of the differences in motility were investigated and found to be due to differences in expression of the motility loci qseB, flhD, fliA, fliC, and motA. For example, K12 MG1655 has significantly higher expression of the motility quorum sensing locus qseB compared with K12 BW25113 (139-fold) and compared to JM109 (209-fold) that led to higher expression of flhD, fliA, and motA (which are controlled by QseB). These differences in the motility phenotype serve to explain the differences in biomass and architecture between each strain. Considering biomass, the fact that BW25113 was basically non-motile and displayed low expression of the motility-related genes indicates it is unable to form a mature biofilm in a continous system since it cannot move well and establish new colonies. Additionally, the effect of motility on architecture could be elucidated based n the differences on motility between both E. coli MG1655, E. coli K12 ATCC25404, and E. coli JM109 as JM109, which is the least motile of these three, displayed flatter macrocolonies compared with K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, which had more dramatic vertical structures as a result of its enhanced motility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings
Pages9131
Number of pages1
StatePublished - 2005
Event05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase - Cincinnati, OH, United States
Duration: Oct 30 2005Nov 4 2005

Other

Other05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase
CountryUnited States
CityCincinnati, OH
Period10/30/0511/4/05

Fingerprint

Biofilms
Escherichia coli
Biomass
Surface roughness
Confocal microscopy
Image analysis
Glucose
Macros
Genes
Fluorescence
Proteins
Acids

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Gonzalez Barrios, A. F., Herzberg, M., Lee, J., & Wood, T. K. (2005). Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains. In 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings (pp. 9131)
Gonzalez Barrios, Andrés F. ; Herzberg, Moshe ; Lee, Jintae ; Wood, Thomas Keith. / Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains. 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings. 2005. pp. 9131
@inproceedings{a1d574ee80fb4f1cbcbc37914b26e32f,
title = "Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains",
abstract = "To relate differences in motility to their effect on biofilm architecture, five Escherichia coli strains, K12 M1655, K12 ATCC 25404, K12 BW25113, JM109, and DH5□, were studied in a M9 minimal medium containing 0.4 wt {\%} glucose and casamino acids with a continuous flow system by using confocal microscopy and the green fluorescence protein (GFP). The biofilm structures of each strain were quantified using image analysis software COMSTAT. Wild-type strains K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed scattered, branched macro colonies, and the COMSTAT parameters thickness, substratum coverage, and roughness coefficient corroborate the similarities between them (42 ± 14 □m vs. 44 ± 6 □m, 21 ± 8 {\%} vs. 34 ± 13 {\%}, and 0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09, respectively). E. coli JM109 displayed also scattered macrolonies but unlike K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, the macrocolony was smoother which was corroborated by the higher roughness coefficient (1.22 ± 0.13 for E. coli JM109). BW25113 was not able to develop a robust biofilm in this medium, and DH5□ appeared similar to JM109. These differences appear to be related to cell motility. Between the four strains, K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed the highest motility (K12 MG1655 is slightly more motile than K12 ATCC25404) as E. coli K12 MG1655 displayed a 6- and 8-fold increase in motility compared to E. coli JM109 and E. coli BW251123, respectively. The genetic basis of the differences in motility were investigated and found to be due to differences in expression of the motility loci qseB, flhD, fliA, fliC, and motA. For example, K12 MG1655 has significantly higher expression of the motility quorum sensing locus qseB compared with K12 BW25113 (139-fold) and compared to JM109 (209-fold) that led to higher expression of flhD, fliA, and motA (which are controlled by QseB). These differences in the motility phenotype serve to explain the differences in biomass and architecture between each strain. Considering biomass, the fact that BW25113 was basically non-motile and displayed low expression of the motility-related genes indicates it is unable to form a mature biofilm in a continous system since it cannot move well and establish new colonies. Additionally, the effect of motility on architecture could be elucidated based n the differences on motility between both E. coli MG1655, E. coli K12 ATCC25404, and E. coli JM109 as JM109, which is the least motile of these three, displayed flatter macrocolonies compared with K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, which had more dramatic vertical structures as a result of its enhanced motility.",
author = "{Gonzalez Barrios}, {Andr{\'e}s F.} and Moshe Herzberg and Jintae Lee and Wood, {Thomas Keith}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "9131",
booktitle = "05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings",

}

Gonzalez Barrios, AF, Herzberg, M, Lee, J & Wood, TK 2005, Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains. in 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings. pp. 9131, 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 10/30/05.

Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains. / Gonzalez Barrios, Andrés F.; Herzberg, Moshe; Lee, Jintae; Wood, Thomas Keith.

05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings. 2005. p. 9131.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains

AU - Gonzalez Barrios, Andrés F.

AU - Herzberg, Moshe

AU - Lee, Jintae

AU - Wood, Thomas Keith

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - To relate differences in motility to their effect on biofilm architecture, five Escherichia coli strains, K12 M1655, K12 ATCC 25404, K12 BW25113, JM109, and DH5□, were studied in a M9 minimal medium containing 0.4 wt % glucose and casamino acids with a continuous flow system by using confocal microscopy and the green fluorescence protein (GFP). The biofilm structures of each strain were quantified using image analysis software COMSTAT. Wild-type strains K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed scattered, branched macro colonies, and the COMSTAT parameters thickness, substratum coverage, and roughness coefficient corroborate the similarities between them (42 ± 14 □m vs. 44 ± 6 □m, 21 ± 8 % vs. 34 ± 13 %, and 0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09, respectively). E. coli JM109 displayed also scattered macrolonies but unlike K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, the macrocolony was smoother which was corroborated by the higher roughness coefficient (1.22 ± 0.13 for E. coli JM109). BW25113 was not able to develop a robust biofilm in this medium, and DH5□ appeared similar to JM109. These differences appear to be related to cell motility. Between the four strains, K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed the highest motility (K12 MG1655 is slightly more motile than K12 ATCC25404) as E. coli K12 MG1655 displayed a 6- and 8-fold increase in motility compared to E. coli JM109 and E. coli BW251123, respectively. The genetic basis of the differences in motility were investigated and found to be due to differences in expression of the motility loci qseB, flhD, fliA, fliC, and motA. For example, K12 MG1655 has significantly higher expression of the motility quorum sensing locus qseB compared with K12 BW25113 (139-fold) and compared to JM109 (209-fold) that led to higher expression of flhD, fliA, and motA (which are controlled by QseB). These differences in the motility phenotype serve to explain the differences in biomass and architecture between each strain. Considering biomass, the fact that BW25113 was basically non-motile and displayed low expression of the motility-related genes indicates it is unable to form a mature biofilm in a continous system since it cannot move well and establish new colonies. Additionally, the effect of motility on architecture could be elucidated based n the differences on motility between both E. coli MG1655, E. coli K12 ATCC25404, and E. coli JM109 as JM109, which is the least motile of these three, displayed flatter macrocolonies compared with K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, which had more dramatic vertical structures as a result of its enhanced motility.

AB - To relate differences in motility to their effect on biofilm architecture, five Escherichia coli strains, K12 M1655, K12 ATCC 25404, K12 BW25113, JM109, and DH5□, were studied in a M9 minimal medium containing 0.4 wt % glucose and casamino acids with a continuous flow system by using confocal microscopy and the green fluorescence protein (GFP). The biofilm structures of each strain were quantified using image analysis software COMSTAT. Wild-type strains K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed scattered, branched macro colonies, and the COMSTAT parameters thickness, substratum coverage, and roughness coefficient corroborate the similarities between them (42 ± 14 □m vs. 44 ± 6 □m, 21 ± 8 % vs. 34 ± 13 %, and 0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09, respectively). E. coli JM109 displayed also scattered macrolonies but unlike K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, the macrocolony was smoother which was corroborated by the higher roughness coefficient (1.22 ± 0.13 for E. coli JM109). BW25113 was not able to develop a robust biofilm in this medium, and DH5□ appeared similar to JM109. These differences appear to be related to cell motility. Between the four strains, K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404 displayed the highest motility (K12 MG1655 is slightly more motile than K12 ATCC25404) as E. coli K12 MG1655 displayed a 6- and 8-fold increase in motility compared to E. coli JM109 and E. coli BW251123, respectively. The genetic basis of the differences in motility were investigated and found to be due to differences in expression of the motility loci qseB, flhD, fliA, fliC, and motA. For example, K12 MG1655 has significantly higher expression of the motility quorum sensing locus qseB compared with K12 BW25113 (139-fold) and compared to JM109 (209-fold) that led to higher expression of flhD, fliA, and motA (which are controlled by QseB). These differences in the motility phenotype serve to explain the differences in biomass and architecture between each strain. Considering biomass, the fact that BW25113 was basically non-motile and displayed low expression of the motility-related genes indicates it is unable to form a mature biofilm in a continous system since it cannot move well and establish new colonies. Additionally, the effect of motility on architecture could be elucidated based n the differences on motility between both E. coli MG1655, E. coli K12 ATCC25404, and E. coli JM109 as JM109, which is the least motile of these three, displayed flatter macrocolonies compared with K12 MG1655 and K12 ATCC25404, which had more dramatic vertical structures as a result of its enhanced motility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645641807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645641807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 9131

BT - 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings

ER -

Gonzalez Barrios AF, Herzberg M, Lee J, Wood TK. Analysis of biofilm architecture in escherichia coli strains. In 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Conference Proceedings. 2005. p. 9131