Analysis of streamflow trends and the effects of climate in Pennsylvania, 1971 to 2001

Y. Zhu, R. L. Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An understanding of temporal trends in total streamflow (TSF), base flow (BF), and storm runoff (RO) can help in the development of water management plans for watersheds and local communities. In this study, 47 streams across Pennsylvania that were unregulated and unaffected by karst environments or coal mining were studied for flow trends and their relationships to selected climate parameters for the period 1971 to 2001. LOWESS curves for annual flow showed that almost all of the selected streams in Pennsylvania had downward trends in total TSF, BF, and RO. Using a seasonal Mann-Kendall analysis, downward trends were significant at an α = 0.05 level for 68, percent 70 percent, and 62 percent of the streams and at an α = 0.10 level for another 19, 17, and 13 percent of the streams for TSF, BF, and RO, respectively. The ratio of BF to TSF (RBS) had significant upward trends for 34 percent of the streams at an α = 0.05 level and for another 9 percent of the streams at an α = 0.10 level, indicating that TSF decreased relative to BF for more than 40 percent of the streams during the previous 30 years. Downward trends in TSF, BF, and RO were most common for the months of June, July, and December. Trend analyses using monthly and annual total precipitation and mean temperature showed some association between climate and the streamflow trends, but Spearman's correlation and partial Mann-Kendall analyses revealed that the trends in TSF, BF, and RO could not be explained by trends in precipitation and temperature alone, and thus urbanization and development may have played a role. (JAWRA) (

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number03209
Pages (from-to)1393-1405
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the American Water Resources Association
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

streamflow
baseflow
climate
runoff
trend
analysis
effect
trend analysis
coal mining
karst
water management
urbanization
temperature
watershed

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

@article{2dd74e01f7f84818843cd69b825bff94,
title = "Analysis of streamflow trends and the effects of climate in Pennsylvania, 1971 to 2001",
abstract = "An understanding of temporal trends in total streamflow (TSF), base flow (BF), and storm runoff (RO) can help in the development of water management plans for watersheds and local communities. In this study, 47 streams across Pennsylvania that were unregulated and unaffected by karst environments or coal mining were studied for flow trends and their relationships to selected climate parameters for the period 1971 to 2001. LOWESS curves for annual flow showed that almost all of the selected streams in Pennsylvania had downward trends in total TSF, BF, and RO. Using a seasonal Mann-Kendall analysis, downward trends were significant at an α = 0.05 level for 68, percent 70 percent, and 62 percent of the streams and at an α = 0.10 level for another 19, 17, and 13 percent of the streams for TSF, BF, and RO, respectively. The ratio of BF to TSF (RBS) had significant upward trends for 34 percent of the streams at an α = 0.05 level and for another 9 percent of the streams at an α = 0.10 level, indicating that TSF decreased relative to BF for more than 40 percent of the streams during the previous 30 years. Downward trends in TSF, BF, and RO were most common for the months of June, July, and December. Trend analyses using monthly and annual total precipitation and mean temperature showed some association between climate and the streamflow trends, but Spearman's correlation and partial Mann-Kendall analyses revealed that the trends in TSF, BF, and RO could not be explained by trends in precipitation and temperature alone, and thus urbanization and development may have played a role. (JAWRA) (",
author = "Y. Zhu and Day, {R. L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03807.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1393--1405",
journal = "Journal of the American Water Resources Association",
issn = "1093-474X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Analysis of streamflow trends and the effects of climate in Pennsylvania, 1971 to 2001. / Zhu, Y.; Day, R. L.

In: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 41, No. 6, 03209, 01.12.2005, p. 1393-1405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of streamflow trends and the effects of climate in Pennsylvania, 1971 to 2001

AU - Zhu, Y.

AU - Day, R. L.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - An understanding of temporal trends in total streamflow (TSF), base flow (BF), and storm runoff (RO) can help in the development of water management plans for watersheds and local communities. In this study, 47 streams across Pennsylvania that were unregulated and unaffected by karst environments or coal mining were studied for flow trends and their relationships to selected climate parameters for the period 1971 to 2001. LOWESS curves for annual flow showed that almost all of the selected streams in Pennsylvania had downward trends in total TSF, BF, and RO. Using a seasonal Mann-Kendall analysis, downward trends were significant at an α = 0.05 level for 68, percent 70 percent, and 62 percent of the streams and at an α = 0.10 level for another 19, 17, and 13 percent of the streams for TSF, BF, and RO, respectively. The ratio of BF to TSF (RBS) had significant upward trends for 34 percent of the streams at an α = 0.05 level and for another 9 percent of the streams at an α = 0.10 level, indicating that TSF decreased relative to BF for more than 40 percent of the streams during the previous 30 years. Downward trends in TSF, BF, and RO were most common for the months of June, July, and December. Trend analyses using monthly and annual total precipitation and mean temperature showed some association between climate and the streamflow trends, but Spearman's correlation and partial Mann-Kendall analyses revealed that the trends in TSF, BF, and RO could not be explained by trends in precipitation and temperature alone, and thus urbanization and development may have played a role. (JAWRA) (

AB - An understanding of temporal trends in total streamflow (TSF), base flow (BF), and storm runoff (RO) can help in the development of water management plans for watersheds and local communities. In this study, 47 streams across Pennsylvania that were unregulated and unaffected by karst environments or coal mining were studied for flow trends and their relationships to selected climate parameters for the period 1971 to 2001. LOWESS curves for annual flow showed that almost all of the selected streams in Pennsylvania had downward trends in total TSF, BF, and RO. Using a seasonal Mann-Kendall analysis, downward trends were significant at an α = 0.05 level for 68, percent 70 percent, and 62 percent of the streams and at an α = 0.10 level for another 19, 17, and 13 percent of the streams for TSF, BF, and RO, respectively. The ratio of BF to TSF (RBS) had significant upward trends for 34 percent of the streams at an α = 0.05 level and for another 9 percent of the streams at an α = 0.10 level, indicating that TSF decreased relative to BF for more than 40 percent of the streams during the previous 30 years. Downward trends in TSF, BF, and RO were most common for the months of June, July, and December. Trend analyses using monthly and annual total precipitation and mean temperature showed some association between climate and the streamflow trends, but Spearman's correlation and partial Mann-Kendall analyses revealed that the trends in TSF, BF, and RO could not be explained by trends in precipitation and temperature alone, and thus urbanization and development may have played a role. (JAWRA) (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31344444930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31344444930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03807.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03807.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:31344444930

VL - 41

SP - 1393

EP - 1405

JO - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JF - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

SN - 1093-474X

IS - 6

M1 - 03209

ER -