Analytical and numerical calculations of the magnetic force microscopy response: A comparison

R. Engel-Herbert, D. M. Schaadt, T. Hesjedal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate the domain structure of submicrometer sized ferromagnetic stripes exhibiting in-plane and out-of-plane magnetized areas with magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Two simulation approaches are used to calculate the observed MFM response. The first relies on an analytical solution for the stray field of a bar magnet and the subsequent modeling of the sample as an arrangement of bar magnets. The MFM response is calculated for a realistic tip shape incorporating a distribution of magnetic dipoles. The second, numerical approach is based on a discretization scheme, breaking the tip-sample problem up into cells and then calculating the energy of the magnetic tip-sample interaction. The MFM responses obtained for the ferromagnetic stripe structure are compared. A discussion of the advantages and limitations of the two methods is given in terms of precision, computing time, and flexibility. The numerical method offers shorter computing times and greater flexibility, opening the door for realistic three-dimensional MFM response simulations. The advantage of the analytical method is the investigation of small structures, as its precision is higher for the comparable computational effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number113905
JournalJournal of Applied Physics
Volume99
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

magnetic force microscopy
flexibility
magnets
magnetic dipoles
simulation
cells
interactions
energy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

@article{83aa47b565244ac18e48930847f9dcc4,
title = "Analytical and numerical calculations of the magnetic force microscopy response: A comparison",
abstract = "We investigate the domain structure of submicrometer sized ferromagnetic stripes exhibiting in-plane and out-of-plane magnetized areas with magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Two simulation approaches are used to calculate the observed MFM response. The first relies on an analytical solution for the stray field of a bar magnet and the subsequent modeling of the sample as an arrangement of bar magnets. The MFM response is calculated for a realistic tip shape incorporating a distribution of magnetic dipoles. The second, numerical approach is based on a discretization scheme, breaking the tip-sample problem up into cells and then calculating the energy of the magnetic tip-sample interaction. The MFM responses obtained for the ferromagnetic stripe structure are compared. A discussion of the advantages and limitations of the two methods is given in terms of precision, computing time, and flexibility. The numerical method offers shorter computing times and greater flexibility, opening the door for realistic three-dimensional MFM response simulations. The advantage of the analytical method is the investigation of small structures, as its precision is higher for the comparable computational effort.",
author = "R. Engel-Herbert and Schaadt, {D. M.} and T. Hesjedal",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1063/1.2202242",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physics",
issn = "0021-8979",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "11",

}

Analytical and numerical calculations of the magnetic force microscopy response : A comparison. / Engel-Herbert, R.; Schaadt, D. M.; Hesjedal, T.

In: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 99, No. 11, 113905, 01.06.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytical and numerical calculations of the magnetic force microscopy response

T2 - A comparison

AU - Engel-Herbert, R.

AU - Schaadt, D. M.

AU - Hesjedal, T.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - We investigate the domain structure of submicrometer sized ferromagnetic stripes exhibiting in-plane and out-of-plane magnetized areas with magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Two simulation approaches are used to calculate the observed MFM response. The first relies on an analytical solution for the stray field of a bar magnet and the subsequent modeling of the sample as an arrangement of bar magnets. The MFM response is calculated for a realistic tip shape incorporating a distribution of magnetic dipoles. The second, numerical approach is based on a discretization scheme, breaking the tip-sample problem up into cells and then calculating the energy of the magnetic tip-sample interaction. The MFM responses obtained for the ferromagnetic stripe structure are compared. A discussion of the advantages and limitations of the two methods is given in terms of precision, computing time, and flexibility. The numerical method offers shorter computing times and greater flexibility, opening the door for realistic three-dimensional MFM response simulations. The advantage of the analytical method is the investigation of small structures, as its precision is higher for the comparable computational effort.

AB - We investigate the domain structure of submicrometer sized ferromagnetic stripes exhibiting in-plane and out-of-plane magnetized areas with magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Two simulation approaches are used to calculate the observed MFM response. The first relies on an analytical solution for the stray field of a bar magnet and the subsequent modeling of the sample as an arrangement of bar magnets. The MFM response is calculated for a realistic tip shape incorporating a distribution of magnetic dipoles. The second, numerical approach is based on a discretization scheme, breaking the tip-sample problem up into cells and then calculating the energy of the magnetic tip-sample interaction. The MFM responses obtained for the ferromagnetic stripe structure are compared. A discussion of the advantages and limitations of the two methods is given in terms of precision, computing time, and flexibility. The numerical method offers shorter computing times and greater flexibility, opening the door for realistic three-dimensional MFM response simulations. The advantage of the analytical method is the investigation of small structures, as its precision is higher for the comparable computational effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745228055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745228055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.2202242

DO - 10.1063/1.2202242

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33745228055

VL - 99

JO - Journal of Applied Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Physics

SN - 0021-8979

IS - 11

M1 - 113905

ER -